Cargando…

Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1

The Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors has a conserved ectodomain arrangement of five immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains plus three fibronectin type III (Fn) repeats. Based on the strong evolutionary conservation of this domain structure among Robo receptors, as well as in vitro struc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Haley E., Evans, Timothy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241150
_version_ 1783598886864027648
author Brown, Haley E.
Evans, Timothy A.
author_facet Brown, Haley E.
Evans, Timothy A.
author_sort Brown, Haley E.
collection PubMed
description The Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors has a conserved ectodomain arrangement of five immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains plus three fibronectin type III (Fn) repeats. Based on the strong evolutionary conservation of this domain structure among Robo receptors, as well as in vitro structural and domain-domain interaction studies of Robo family members, this ectodomain arrangement is predicted to be important for Robo receptor signaling in response to Slit ligands. Here, we define the minimal ectodomain structure required for Slit binding and midline repulsive signaling in vivo by Drosophila Robo1. We find that the majority of the Robo1 ectodomain is dispensable for both Slit binding and repulsive signaling. We show that a significant level of midline repulsive signaling activity is retained when all Robo1 ectodomain elements apart from Ig1 are deleted, and that the combination of Ig1 plus one additional ectodomain element (Ig2, Ig5, or Fn3) is sufficient to restore midline repulsion to wild type levels. Further, we find that deleting four out of five Robo1 Ig domains (ΔIg2-5) does not affect negative regulation of Robo1 by Commissureless (Comm) or Robo2, while variants lacking all three fibronectin repeats (ΔFn1-3 and ΔIg2-Fn3) are insensitive to regulation by both Comm and Robo2, signifying a novel regulatory role for Robo1’s Fn repeats. Our results provide an in vivo perspective on the importance of the conserved 5+3 ectodomain structure of Robo receptors, and suggest that specific biochemical properties and/or ectodomain structural conformations observed in vitro for domains other than Ig1 may have limited significance for in vivo signaling in the context of midline repulsion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7580999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75809992020-10-27 Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1 Brown, Haley E. Evans, Timothy A. PLoS One Research Article The Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors has a conserved ectodomain arrangement of five immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains plus three fibronectin type III (Fn) repeats. Based on the strong evolutionary conservation of this domain structure among Robo receptors, as well as in vitro structural and domain-domain interaction studies of Robo family members, this ectodomain arrangement is predicted to be important for Robo receptor signaling in response to Slit ligands. Here, we define the minimal ectodomain structure required for Slit binding and midline repulsive signaling in vivo by Drosophila Robo1. We find that the majority of the Robo1 ectodomain is dispensable for both Slit binding and repulsive signaling. We show that a significant level of midline repulsive signaling activity is retained when all Robo1 ectodomain elements apart from Ig1 are deleted, and that the combination of Ig1 plus one additional ectodomain element (Ig2, Ig5, or Fn3) is sufficient to restore midline repulsion to wild type levels. Further, we find that deleting four out of five Robo1 Ig domains (ΔIg2-5) does not affect negative regulation of Robo1 by Commissureless (Comm) or Robo2, while variants lacking all three fibronectin repeats (ΔFn1-3 and ΔIg2-Fn3) are insensitive to regulation by both Comm and Robo2, signifying a novel regulatory role for Robo1’s Fn repeats. Our results provide an in vivo perspective on the importance of the conserved 5+3 ectodomain structure of Robo receptors, and suggest that specific biochemical properties and/or ectodomain structural conformations observed in vitro for domains other than Ig1 may have limited significance for in vivo signaling in the context of midline repulsion. Public Library of Science 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7580999/ /pubmed/33091076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241150 Text en © 2020 Brown, Evans http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Haley E.
Evans, Timothy A.
Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title_full Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title_fullStr Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title_full_unstemmed Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title_short Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
title_sort minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of drosophila robo1
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241150
work_keys_str_mv AT brownhaleye minimalstructuralelementsrequiredformidlinerepulsivesignalingandregulationofdrosophilarobo1
AT evanstimothya minimalstructuralelementsrequiredformidlinerepulsivesignalingandregulationofdrosophilarobo1