Cargando…

Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a worldwide neglected disease, encompassing asymptomatic infections and different clinical forms, such as American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (ATL) which is part of the complex of diseases caused by protozoan parasites from Leishmania genus, transmitted by sand fly vectors. As a negl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga, Moreira, Otacilio Cruz, Cantanhêde, Lilian Motta, de Farias, Heloísa Martins Teixeira, Porrozzi, Renato, Britto, Constança, Boité, Mariana Côrtes, Cupolillo, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008750
_version_ 1783598888512389120
author Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga
Moreira, Otacilio Cruz
Cantanhêde, Lilian Motta
de Farias, Heloísa Martins Teixeira
Porrozzi, Renato
Britto, Constança
Boité, Mariana Côrtes
Cupolillo, Elisa
author_facet Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga
Moreira, Otacilio Cruz
Cantanhêde, Lilian Motta
de Farias, Heloísa Martins Teixeira
Porrozzi, Renato
Britto, Constança
Boité, Mariana Côrtes
Cupolillo, Elisa
author_sort Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga
collection PubMed
description Leishmaniasis is a worldwide neglected disease, encompassing asymptomatic infections and different clinical forms, such as American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (ATL) which is part of the complex of diseases caused by protozoan parasites from Leishmania genus, transmitted by sand fly vectors. As a neglected disease, much effort is still needed in treatment and diagnosis. Currently, ATL diagnosis is mainly made by parasite detection by microscopy. The sensitivity of the method varies, and factors such as collection procedures interfere. Molecular approaches, specially based on Real Time PCR (qPCR) technique, has been widely used to detect Leishmania infection and to quantify parasite load, once it is a simple, rapid and sensitive methodology, capable to detect low parasite concentrations and less prone to variability. Although many studies have been already published addressing the use of this technique, an improvement on these methodologies, including an analytical validation, standardization and data association is demanded. Moreover, a proper validation by the assay by the use of clinical samples is still required. In this sense, the purpose of the present work is to compare the performance of qPCR using two commonly used targets (18S rDNA and HSP70) with an internal control (RNAse P) in multiplex reactions. Additionally, we validated reactions by assaying 88 samples from patients presenting different clinical forms of leishmaniasis (cutaneous, mucosal, recent and old lesions), representing the diversity found in Brazil’s Amazon Region. Following the methodology proposed herein, the results indicate the use of both qPCR assays, 18S rDNA and HSP70, to achieve a very good net sensitivity (98.5%) and specificity (100%), performing simultaneous or sequential testing, respectively. With this approach, our main goal is to conclude the first step of a further multicenter study to propose the standardization of detection and quantification of Leishmania.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75810062020-10-27 Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga Moreira, Otacilio Cruz Cantanhêde, Lilian Motta de Farias, Heloísa Martins Teixeira Porrozzi, Renato Britto, Constança Boité, Mariana Côrtes Cupolillo, Elisa PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Leishmaniasis is a worldwide neglected disease, encompassing asymptomatic infections and different clinical forms, such as American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis (ATL) which is part of the complex of diseases caused by protozoan parasites from Leishmania genus, transmitted by sand fly vectors. As a neglected disease, much effort is still needed in treatment and diagnosis. Currently, ATL diagnosis is mainly made by parasite detection by microscopy. The sensitivity of the method varies, and factors such as collection procedures interfere. Molecular approaches, specially based on Real Time PCR (qPCR) technique, has been widely used to detect Leishmania infection and to quantify parasite load, once it is a simple, rapid and sensitive methodology, capable to detect low parasite concentrations and less prone to variability. Although many studies have been already published addressing the use of this technique, an improvement on these methodologies, including an analytical validation, standardization and data association is demanded. Moreover, a proper validation by the assay by the use of clinical samples is still required. In this sense, the purpose of the present work is to compare the performance of qPCR using two commonly used targets (18S rDNA and HSP70) with an internal control (RNAse P) in multiplex reactions. Additionally, we validated reactions by assaying 88 samples from patients presenting different clinical forms of leishmaniasis (cutaneous, mucosal, recent and old lesions), representing the diversity found in Brazil’s Amazon Region. Following the methodology proposed herein, the results indicate the use of both qPCR assays, 18S rDNA and HSP70, to achieve a very good net sensitivity (98.5%) and specificity (100%), performing simultaneous or sequential testing, respectively. With this approach, our main goal is to conclude the first step of a further multicenter study to propose the standardization of detection and quantification of Leishmania. Public Library of Science 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7581006/ /pubmed/33044986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008750 Text en © 2020 Filgueira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Filgueira, Camila Patricio Braga
Moreira, Otacilio Cruz
Cantanhêde, Lilian Motta
de Farias, Heloísa Martins Teixeira
Porrozzi, Renato
Britto, Constança
Boité, Mariana Côrtes
Cupolillo, Elisa
Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title_full Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title_fullStr Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title_short Comparison and clinical validation of qPCR assays targeting Leishmania 18S rDNA and HSP70 genes in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis
title_sort comparison and clinical validation of qpcr assays targeting leishmania 18s rdna and hsp70 genes in patients with american tegumentary leishmaniasis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008750
work_keys_str_mv AT filgueiracamilapatriciobraga comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT moreiraotaciliocruz comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT cantanhedelilianmotta comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT defariasheloisamartinsteixeira comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT porrozzirenato comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT brittoconstanca comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT boitemarianacortes comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis
AT cupolilloelisa comparisonandclinicalvalidationofqpcrassaystargetingleishmania18srdnaandhsp70genesinpatientswithamericantegumentaryleishmaniasis