Cargando…
Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis
Routine postoperative surveillance is recommended for the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to clarify the conditions indicate initial suspicion of CRC recurrence in different preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level groups, including positive physical signs/symp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022803 |
_version_ | 1783598900836302848 |
---|---|
author | Hung, Hsinyuan You, Jengfu Chiang, Jyming Hsieh, Paoshiu Chiang, Sumfu Lai, Chengchou Tasi, Wensy Yeh, Chienyuh |
author_facet | Hung, Hsinyuan You, Jengfu Chiang, Jyming Hsieh, Paoshiu Chiang, Sumfu Lai, Chengchou Tasi, Wensy Yeh, Chienyuh |
author_sort | Hung, Hsinyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Routine postoperative surveillance is recommended for the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to clarify the conditions indicate initial suspicion of CRC recurrence in different preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level groups, including positive physical signs/symptoms, elevated CEA level, positive radiologic studies results, and other elevated tumor markers. A total of 2268 patients with recurrence after curative surgery for CRC were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to preoperative serum CEA level (low, <2 ng/mL; intermediate, ≥2 and <5 ng/mL; and high, ≥5 ng/mL). Up to 63.6% of recurrence was suspected based on elevated CEA level in the high preoperative serum CEA level group. Patients in the low preoperative serum CEA level group had a higher rate of initial suspicion of recurrence based on positive physical signs or symptoms (36.7% vs 26.9% vs 20.4%, P < .001) and positive radiologic findings (51.4% vs 40.7% vs 29.5%, P < .001) than those in the intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. Conditions indicate initial suspicion of recurrence varied in the different preoperative serum CEA level groups. In patients with low preoperative serum CEA level, the detection of recurrence depend on abnormal CEA level is less sensitive than intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. We suggest that the strategy for CRC surveillance should not depend on serum CEA level alone. The signs or symptoms of patients, changes in postoperative serial CEA level, and ongoing radiologic or imaging findings must be cautiously monitored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75810612020-10-30 Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis Hung, Hsinyuan You, Jengfu Chiang, Jyming Hsieh, Paoshiu Chiang, Sumfu Lai, Chengchou Tasi, Wensy Yeh, Chienyuh Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Routine postoperative surveillance is recommended for the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to clarify the conditions indicate initial suspicion of CRC recurrence in different preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level groups, including positive physical signs/symptoms, elevated CEA level, positive radiologic studies results, and other elevated tumor markers. A total of 2268 patients with recurrence after curative surgery for CRC were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to preoperative serum CEA level (low, <2 ng/mL; intermediate, ≥2 and <5 ng/mL; and high, ≥5 ng/mL). Up to 63.6% of recurrence was suspected based on elevated CEA level in the high preoperative serum CEA level group. Patients in the low preoperative serum CEA level group had a higher rate of initial suspicion of recurrence based on positive physical signs or symptoms (36.7% vs 26.9% vs 20.4%, P < .001) and positive radiologic findings (51.4% vs 40.7% vs 29.5%, P < .001) than those in the intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. Conditions indicate initial suspicion of recurrence varied in the different preoperative serum CEA level groups. In patients with low preoperative serum CEA level, the detection of recurrence depend on abnormal CEA level is less sensitive than intermediate and high preoperative serum CEA groups. We suggest that the strategy for CRC surveillance should not depend on serum CEA level alone. The signs or symptoms of patients, changes in postoperative serial CEA level, and ongoing radiologic or imaging findings must be cautiously monitored. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7581061/ /pubmed/33120800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022803 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Hung, Hsinyuan You, Jengfu Chiang, Jyming Hsieh, Paoshiu Chiang, Sumfu Lai, Chengchou Tasi, Wensy Yeh, Chienyuh Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title | Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title_full | Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title_short | Why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: A retrospective analysis |
title_sort | why recurrence was initially suspected during colorectal cancer postoperative surveillance?: a retrospective analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunghsinyuan whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT youjengfu whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT chiangjyming whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT hsiehpaoshiu whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT chiangsumfu whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT laichengchou whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT tasiwensy whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis AT yehchienyuh whyrecurrencewasinitiallysuspectedduringcolorectalcancerpostoperativesurveillancearetrospectiveanalysis |