Cargando…

Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious stroke subtype. The effective therapies for patients with sICH are still unclear, and the role of hemostatic agents in sICH is still unclear. Although some studies have shown that hemostatic agents could benefit patients with sICH,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yujian, Zheng, Jun, Zhou, Huiqing, Yang, Xiang, Li, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022876
_version_ 1783598909321379840
author Li, Yujian
Zheng, Jun
Zhou, Huiqing
Yang, Xiang
Li, Hao
author_facet Li, Yujian
Zheng, Jun
Zhou, Huiqing
Yang, Xiang
Li, Hao
author_sort Li, Yujian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious stroke subtype. The effective therapies for patients with sICH are still unclear, and the role of hemostatic agents in sICH is still unclear. Although some studies have shown that hemostatic agents could benefit patients with sICH, different hemostatic drugs have different effects on patients with sICH, and which hemostatic drug has the best effect on the prevention of hematoma expansion and neurological deterioration in sICH patients remains unclear. To better understand the effects of hemostatic agents in patients with sICH, it is necessary to carry out a network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the effects of different hemostatic agents. METHODS: This protocol has been designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. Related studies in the following databases will be searched until September 2020: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies comparing at least 2 different hemostatic agents in sICH patients will be included. A quality assessment will be conducted with the Cochrane Collaboration tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale based on the study design. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hematoma expansion, and the secondary outcome will be the functional outcome. Pairwise and network meta-analyses will be conducted using STATA V.14 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Mean ranks and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to evaluate every agent. Statistical inconsistency assessment, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment will be performed. RESULTS: According to disseminate through academic conferences, the results of this network meta-analysis are expected to publish in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: This study will provide high quality evidence about effects of different hemostatic agents in patients with sICH. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020196039.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75810982020-10-30 Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis Li, Yujian Zheng, Jun Zhou, Huiqing Yang, Xiang Li, Hao Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious stroke subtype. The effective therapies for patients with sICH are still unclear, and the role of hemostatic agents in sICH is still unclear. Although some studies have shown that hemostatic agents could benefit patients with sICH, different hemostatic drugs have different effects on patients with sICH, and which hemostatic drug has the best effect on the prevention of hematoma expansion and neurological deterioration in sICH patients remains unclear. To better understand the effects of hemostatic agents in patients with sICH, it is necessary to carry out a network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the effects of different hemostatic agents. METHODS: This protocol has been designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. Related studies in the following databases will be searched until September 2020: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies comparing at least 2 different hemostatic agents in sICH patients will be included. A quality assessment will be conducted with the Cochrane Collaboration tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale based on the study design. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hematoma expansion, and the secondary outcome will be the functional outcome. Pairwise and network meta-analyses will be conducted using STATA V.14 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Mean ranks and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to evaluate every agent. Statistical inconsistency assessment, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment will be performed. RESULTS: According to disseminate through academic conferences, the results of this network meta-analysis are expected to publish in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: This study will provide high quality evidence about effects of different hemostatic agents in patients with sICH. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020196039. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7581098/ /pubmed/33120829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022876 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Li, Yujian
Zheng, Jun
Zhou, Huiqing
Yang, Xiang
Li, Hao
Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol for a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of hemostatic agents in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a protocol for a network meta-analysis
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022876
work_keys_str_mv AT liyujian comparisonofhemostaticagentsinpatientswithspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageaprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhengjun comparisonofhemostaticagentsinpatientswithspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageaprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhouhuiqing comparisonofhemostaticagentsinpatientswithspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageaprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangxiang comparisonofhemostaticagentsinpatientswithspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageaprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis
AT lihao comparisonofhemostaticagentsinpatientswithspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageaprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis