Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis

INTRODUCTION: Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, currently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis only compare 1 or 2 types of traditional Chinese medicine therapies, and the comprehensive ranking of efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Ting, Yan, ShiFan, Chi, ZhenHai, Cheng, Pan, Li, HaiYan, Qin, SiYu, Li, MingHui, Chen, RiXin, Jiao, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022521
_version_ 1783598910014488576
author Yu, Ting
Yan, ShiFan
Chi, ZhenHai
Cheng, Pan
Li, HaiYan
Qin, SiYu
Li, MingHui
Chen, RiXin
Jiao, Lin
author_facet Yu, Ting
Yan, ShiFan
Chi, ZhenHai
Cheng, Pan
Li, HaiYan
Qin, SiYu
Li, MingHui
Chen, RiXin
Jiao, Lin
author_sort Yu, Ting
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, currently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis only compare 1 or 2 types of traditional Chinese medicine therapies, and the comprehensive ranking of efficacy and safety of multiple traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis has not been completed. Therefore, the purpose of this network meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three English databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and 2 Chinese databases of CNKI and Wanfang were searched from their inceptions to September 1, 2020. At the same time, in order to prevent omissions, we also compared the previous meta-analysis to determine the final included trials. The main evaluation outcome was the total Clinical Score (total nasal symptom score [TNSS]), the secondary evaluation outcome was the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of articles, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Network meta-analysis was completed by using Stata Statistical Software (Version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). RESULTS: This study will compare and rank the different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSION: This study is the first time to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which will provide ideas and methods for the clinical treatment for allergic rhinitis. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: No. INPLASY202080119
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75811012020-10-30 Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis Yu, Ting Yan, ShiFan Chi, ZhenHai Cheng, Pan Li, HaiYan Qin, SiYu Li, MingHui Chen, RiXin Jiao, Lin Medicine (Baltimore) 6700 INTRODUCTION: Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, currently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis only compare 1 or 2 types of traditional Chinese medicine therapies, and the comprehensive ranking of efficacy and safety of multiple traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis has not been completed. Therefore, the purpose of this network meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three English databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and 2 Chinese databases of CNKI and Wanfang were searched from their inceptions to September 1, 2020. At the same time, in order to prevent omissions, we also compared the previous meta-analysis to determine the final included trials. The main evaluation outcome was the total Clinical Score (total nasal symptom score [TNSS]), the secondary evaluation outcome was the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of articles, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Network meta-analysis was completed by using Stata Statistical Software (Version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). RESULTS: This study will compare and rank the different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSION: This study is the first time to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which will provide ideas and methods for the clinical treatment for allergic rhinitis. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: No. INPLASY202080119 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7581101/ /pubmed/33120741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022521 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6700
Yu, Ting
Yan, ShiFan
Chi, ZhenHai
Cheng, Pan
Li, HaiYan
Qin, SiYu
Li, MingHui
Chen, RiXin
Jiao, Lin
Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of different traditional chinese medicine therapies for allergic rhinitis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta analysis
topic 6700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022521
work_keys_str_mv AT yuting effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yanshifan effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chizhenhai effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chengpan effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lihaiyan effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT qinsiyu effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liminghui effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenrixin effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jiaolin effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttraditionalchinesemedicinetherapiesforallergicrhinitisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis