Cargando…
Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840 |
_version_ | 1783598923393269760 |
---|---|
author | Song, Gao Cheng, Meng Qun Wei, Xian Wen |
author_facet | Song, Gao Cheng, Meng Qun Wei, Xian Wen |
author_sort | Song, Gao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). A comprehensive search of COVID-19 clinical trials since the establishment of the ICTRP to June 11, 2020, was conducted to record and analyze relevant characteristics. Chi-Squared test was used to compare the statistical differences between different research types, interventions, and sources. A total of 3282 COVID-19 clinical trials in 17 clinical trial registration centers were registered with the WHO ICTRP. The main research sources for the present study were ClinicalTrials.gov and ChiCTR. There were significant differences in the parameters of study location (P = .000), number of participants (P = .000), study duration (P = .001), research stage (P = .000), randomization procedure (P = .000), and blinding method (P = .000) between the 2 registration sources. There were significant differences in all the parameters between different kinds of intervention methods. Hydroxychloroquine, plasma therapy, and Xiyanping injection were the high-frequency research drugs used. Ten different vaccine studies were registered under phases I-II. Amongst the studies researched, heterogeneity existed for various parameters. Differences in the type of study, interventions, and registration sources of the studies led to significant differences in certain parameters of the COVID-19 clinical trials. The statistics of high-frequency drugs and the progress of vaccine trials may provide an informative reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75811592020-10-30 Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations Song, Gao Cheng, Meng Qun Wei, Xian Wen Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). A comprehensive search of COVID-19 clinical trials since the establishment of the ICTRP to June 11, 2020, was conducted to record and analyze relevant characteristics. Chi-Squared test was used to compare the statistical differences between different research types, interventions, and sources. A total of 3282 COVID-19 clinical trials in 17 clinical trial registration centers were registered with the WHO ICTRP. The main research sources for the present study were ClinicalTrials.gov and ChiCTR. There were significant differences in the parameters of study location (P = .000), number of participants (P = .000), study duration (P = .001), research stage (P = .000), randomization procedure (P = .000), and blinding method (P = .000) between the 2 registration sources. There were significant differences in all the parameters between different kinds of intervention methods. Hydroxychloroquine, plasma therapy, and Xiyanping injection were the high-frequency research drugs used. Ten different vaccine studies were registered under phases I-II. Amongst the studies researched, heterogeneity existed for various parameters. Differences in the type of study, interventions, and registration sources of the studies led to significant differences in certain parameters of the COVID-19 clinical trials. The statistics of high-frequency drugs and the progress of vaccine trials may provide an informative reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7581159/ /pubmed/33120812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | 4900 Song, Gao Cheng, Meng Qun Wei, Xian Wen Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title | Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title_full | Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title_short | Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
title_sort | analysis of the who ictrp for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songgao analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations AT chengmengqun analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations AT weixianwen analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations |