Cargando…

Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations

Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Gao, Cheng, Meng Qun, Wei, Xian Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840
_version_ 1783598923393269760
author Song, Gao
Cheng, Meng Qun
Wei, Xian Wen
author_facet Song, Gao
Cheng, Meng Qun
Wei, Xian Wen
author_sort Song, Gao
collection PubMed
description Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). A comprehensive search of COVID-19 clinical trials since the establishment of the ICTRP to June 11, 2020, was conducted to record and analyze relevant characteristics. Chi-Squared test was used to compare the statistical differences between different research types, interventions, and sources. A total of 3282 COVID-19 clinical trials in 17 clinical trial registration centers were registered with the WHO ICTRP. The main research sources for the present study were ClinicalTrials.gov and ChiCTR. There were significant differences in the parameters of study location (P = .000), number of participants (P = .000), study duration (P = .001), research stage (P = .000), randomization procedure (P = .000), and blinding method (P = .000) between the 2 registration sources. There were significant differences in all the parameters between different kinds of intervention methods. Hydroxychloroquine, plasma therapy, and Xiyanping injection were the high-frequency research drugs used. Ten different vaccine studies were registered under phases I-II. Amongst the studies researched, heterogeneity existed for various parameters. Differences in the type of study, interventions, and registration sources of the studies led to significant differences in certain parameters of the COVID-19 clinical trials. The statistics of high-frequency drugs and the progress of vaccine trials may provide an informative reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75811592020-10-30 Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations Song, Gao Cheng, Meng Qun Wei, Xian Wen Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Up-to-date information on the current progress made in the research and development to control the global COVID-19 pandemic is important. The study aimed to analyze the clinical trial characteristics and vaccine development progress of the new Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) registered with the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). A comprehensive search of COVID-19 clinical trials since the establishment of the ICTRP to June 11, 2020, was conducted to record and analyze relevant characteristics. Chi-Squared test was used to compare the statistical differences between different research types, interventions, and sources. A total of 3282 COVID-19 clinical trials in 17 clinical trial registration centers were registered with the WHO ICTRP. The main research sources for the present study were ClinicalTrials.gov and ChiCTR. There were significant differences in the parameters of study location (P = .000), number of participants (P = .000), study duration (P = .001), research stage (P = .000), randomization procedure (P = .000), and blinding method (P = .000) between the 2 registration sources. There were significant differences in all the parameters between different kinds of intervention methods. Hydroxychloroquine, plasma therapy, and Xiyanping injection were the high-frequency research drugs used. Ten different vaccine studies were registered under phases I-II. Amongst the studies researched, heterogeneity existed for various parameters. Differences in the type of study, interventions, and registration sources of the studies led to significant differences in certain parameters of the COVID-19 clinical trials. The statistics of high-frequency drugs and the progress of vaccine trials may provide an informative reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7581159/ /pubmed/33120812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle 4900
Song, Gao
Cheng, Meng Qun
Wei, Xian Wen
Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title_full Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title_fullStr Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title_short Analysis of the WHO ICTRP for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
title_sort analysis of the who ictrp for novel coronavirus clinical trial registrations
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022840
work_keys_str_mv AT songgao analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations
AT chengmengqun analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations
AT weixianwen analysisofthewhoictrpfornovelcoronavirusclinicaltrialregistrations