Cargando…

Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention

Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraemer, P.M., Görner, M., Ramezanpour, H., Dicke, P.W., Thier, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020
_version_ 1783598930527780864
author Kraemer, P.M.
Görner, M.
Ramezanpour, H.
Dicke, P.W.
Thier, P.
author_facet Kraemer, P.M.
Görner, M.
Ramezanpour, H.
Dicke, P.W.
Thier, P.
author_sort Kraemer, P.M.
collection PubMed
description Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting shifts of attention, mediated by human lateral intraparietal area (hLIP). However, it is not clear how the brain copes with situations in which information on gaze direction alone is insufficient to identify the target object because more than one may lie along the gaze vector. In this fMRI study, we tested human subjects on a paradigm that allowed the identification of a target object based on the integration of the other’s gaze direction and information provided by an auditory cue on the relevant object category. Whereas the GFP activity turned out to be fully determined by the use of gaze direction, activity in hLIP reflected the total information needed to pinpoint the target. Moreover, in an exploratory analysis, we found that a region in the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) was sensitive to the total information on the target. An examination of the BOLD time courses in the three identified areas suggests functionally complementary roles. Although the GFP seems to primarily process directional information stemming from the other’s gaze, the IFJ may help to analyze the scene when gaze direction and auditory information are not sufficient to pinpoint the target. Finally, hLIP integrates both streams of information to shift attention to distinct spatial locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75811892020-10-23 Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention Kraemer, P.M. Görner, M. Ramezanpour, H. Dicke, P.W. Thier, P. eNeuro Research Article: New Research Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting shifts of attention, mediated by human lateral intraparietal area (hLIP). However, it is not clear how the brain copes with situations in which information on gaze direction alone is insufficient to identify the target object because more than one may lie along the gaze vector. In this fMRI study, we tested human subjects on a paradigm that allowed the identification of a target object based on the integration of the other’s gaze direction and information provided by an auditory cue on the relevant object category. Whereas the GFP activity turned out to be fully determined by the use of gaze direction, activity in hLIP reflected the total information needed to pinpoint the target. Moreover, in an exploratory analysis, we found that a region in the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) was sensitive to the total information on the target. An examination of the BOLD time courses in the three identified areas suggests functionally complementary roles. Although the GFP seems to primarily process directional information stemming from the other’s gaze, the IFJ may help to analyze the scene when gaze direction and auditory information are not sufficient to pinpoint the target. Finally, hLIP integrates both streams of information to shift attention to distinct spatial locations. Society for Neuroscience 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7581189/ /pubmed/32907832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kraemer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: New Research
Kraemer, P.M.
Görner, M.
Ramezanpour, H.
Dicke, P.W.
Thier, P.
Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title_full Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title_fullStr Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title_full_unstemmed Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title_short Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
title_sort frontal, parietal, and temporal brain areas are differentially activated when disambiguating potential objects of joint attention
topic Research Article: New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020
work_keys_str_mv AT kraemerpm frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention
AT gornerm frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention
AT ramezanpourh frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention
AT dickepw frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention
AT thierp frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention