Cargando…
Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention
Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020 |
_version_ | 1783598930527780864 |
---|---|
author | Kraemer, P.M. Görner, M. Ramezanpour, H. Dicke, P.W. Thier, P. |
author_facet | Kraemer, P.M. Görner, M. Ramezanpour, H. Dicke, P.W. Thier, P. |
author_sort | Kraemer, P.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting shifts of attention, mediated by human lateral intraparietal area (hLIP). However, it is not clear how the brain copes with situations in which information on gaze direction alone is insufficient to identify the target object because more than one may lie along the gaze vector. In this fMRI study, we tested human subjects on a paradigm that allowed the identification of a target object based on the integration of the other’s gaze direction and information provided by an auditory cue on the relevant object category. Whereas the GFP activity turned out to be fully determined by the use of gaze direction, activity in hLIP reflected the total information needed to pinpoint the target. Moreover, in an exploratory analysis, we found that a region in the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) was sensitive to the total information on the target. An examination of the BOLD time courses in the three identified areas suggests functionally complementary roles. Although the GFP seems to primarily process directional information stemming from the other’s gaze, the IFJ may help to analyze the scene when gaze direction and auditory information are not sufficient to pinpoint the target. Finally, hLIP integrates both streams of information to shift attention to distinct spatial locations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75811892020-10-23 Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention Kraemer, P.M. Görner, M. Ramezanpour, H. Dicke, P.W. Thier, P. eNeuro Research Article: New Research Humans establish joint attention with others by following the other’s gaze. Previous work has suggested that a cortical patch (gaze-following patch, GFP) close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) may serve as a link between the extraction of the other’s gaze direction and the resulting shifts of attention, mediated by human lateral intraparietal area (hLIP). However, it is not clear how the brain copes with situations in which information on gaze direction alone is insufficient to identify the target object because more than one may lie along the gaze vector. In this fMRI study, we tested human subjects on a paradigm that allowed the identification of a target object based on the integration of the other’s gaze direction and information provided by an auditory cue on the relevant object category. Whereas the GFP activity turned out to be fully determined by the use of gaze direction, activity in hLIP reflected the total information needed to pinpoint the target. Moreover, in an exploratory analysis, we found that a region in the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) was sensitive to the total information on the target. An examination of the BOLD time courses in the three identified areas suggests functionally complementary roles. Although the GFP seems to primarily process directional information stemming from the other’s gaze, the IFJ may help to analyze the scene when gaze direction and auditory information are not sufficient to pinpoint the target. Finally, hLIP integrates both streams of information to shift attention to distinct spatial locations. Society for Neuroscience 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7581189/ /pubmed/32907832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kraemer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article: New Research Kraemer, P.M. Görner, M. Ramezanpour, H. Dicke, P.W. Thier, P. Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title | Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title_full | Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title_fullStr | Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title_short | Frontal, Parietal, and Temporal Brain Areas Are Differentially Activated When Disambiguating Potential Objects of Joint Attention |
title_sort | frontal, parietal, and temporal brain areas are differentially activated when disambiguating potential objects of joint attention |
topic | Research Article: New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0437-19.2020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kraemerpm frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention AT gornerm frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention AT ramezanpourh frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention AT dickepw frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention AT thierp frontalparietalandtemporalbrainareasaredifferentiallyactivatedwhendisambiguatingpotentialobjectsofjointattention |