Cargando…
Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report
Background and study aims The aim of thi systematic review and consensus report is to standardize the practice of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) for pancreatic cystic lesion (PCL) evaluation. Methods We performed an international, systematic, ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1229-4156 |
_version_ | 1783598983626620928 |
---|---|
author | Napoleon, Bertrand Krishna, Somashekar G. Marco, Bruno Carr-Locke, David Chang, Kenneth J. Ginès, Àngels Gress, Frank G. Larghi, Alberto Oppong, Kofi W. Palazzo, Laurent Kongkam, Pradermchai Robles-Medranda, Carlos Sejpal, Divyesh Tan, Damien Brugge, William R. |
author_facet | Napoleon, Bertrand Krishna, Somashekar G. Marco, Bruno Carr-Locke, David Chang, Kenneth J. Ginès, Àngels Gress, Frank G. Larghi, Alberto Oppong, Kofi W. Palazzo, Laurent Kongkam, Pradermchai Robles-Medranda, Carlos Sejpal, Divyesh Tan, Damien Brugge, William R. |
author_sort | Napoleon, Bertrand |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims The aim of thi systematic review and consensus report is to standardize the practice of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) for pancreatic cystic lesion (PCL) evaluation. Methods We performed an international, systematic, evidence-based review of the applications, outcomes, procedural processes, indications, training, and credentialing of EUS-nCLE in management of PCLs. Based on available clinical evidence, preliminary nCLE consensus statements (nCLE-CS) were developed by an international panel of 15 experts in pancreatic diseases. These statements were then voted and edited by using a modified Delphi approach. An a priori threshold of 80 % agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. Results Sixteen nCLE-CS were discussed. Thirteen (81 %) nCLE-CS reached consensus addressing indications (non-communication PCL meeting criteria for EUS-FNA or with prior non-diagnostic EUS-FNA), diagnostic outcomes (improved accuracy for mucinous PCLs and serous cystadenomas with substantial interobserver agreement of image patterns), low incidence of adverse events (fluorescein-associated and pancreatitis), procedural processes (nCLE duration, manipulation of needle with probe), and training (physician knowledge and competence). Conclusion Based on a high level of agreement pertaining to expert consensus statements, this report standardizes the practice of EUS-nCLE. EUS-nCLE should be systematically considered when EUS-FNA is indicated for PCL evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75814632020-11-01 Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report Napoleon, Bertrand Krishna, Somashekar G. Marco, Bruno Carr-Locke, David Chang, Kenneth J. Ginès, Àngels Gress, Frank G. Larghi, Alberto Oppong, Kofi W. Palazzo, Laurent Kongkam, Pradermchai Robles-Medranda, Carlos Sejpal, Divyesh Tan, Damien Brugge, William R. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims The aim of thi systematic review and consensus report is to standardize the practice of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) for pancreatic cystic lesion (PCL) evaluation. Methods We performed an international, systematic, evidence-based review of the applications, outcomes, procedural processes, indications, training, and credentialing of EUS-nCLE in management of PCLs. Based on available clinical evidence, preliminary nCLE consensus statements (nCLE-CS) were developed by an international panel of 15 experts in pancreatic diseases. These statements were then voted and edited by using a modified Delphi approach. An a priori threshold of 80 % agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. Results Sixteen nCLE-CS were discussed. Thirteen (81 %) nCLE-CS reached consensus addressing indications (non-communication PCL meeting criteria for EUS-FNA or with prior non-diagnostic EUS-FNA), diagnostic outcomes (improved accuracy for mucinous PCLs and serous cystadenomas with substantial interobserver agreement of image patterns), low incidence of adverse events (fluorescein-associated and pancreatitis), procedural processes (nCLE duration, manipulation of needle with probe), and training (physician knowledge and competence). Conclusion Based on a high level of agreement pertaining to expert consensus statements, this report standardizes the practice of EUS-nCLE. EUS-nCLE should be systematically considered when EUS-FNA is indicated for PCL evaluation. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-11 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7581463/ /pubmed/33140012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1229-4156 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Napoleon, Bertrand Krishna, Somashekar G. Marco, Bruno Carr-Locke, David Chang, Kenneth J. Ginès, Àngels Gress, Frank G. Larghi, Alberto Oppong, Kofi W. Palazzo, Laurent Kongkam, Pradermchai Robles-Medranda, Carlos Sejpal, Divyesh Tan, Damien Brugge, William R. Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title | Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title_full | Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title_fullStr | Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title_full_unstemmed | Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title_short | Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report |
title_sort | confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international delphi consensus report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1229-4156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT napoleonbertrand confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT krishnasomashekarg confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT marcobruno confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT carrlockedavid confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT changkennethj confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT ginesangels confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT gressfrankg confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT larghialberto confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT oppongkofiw confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT palazzolaurent confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT kongkampradermchai confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT roblesmedrandacarlos confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT sejpaldivyesh confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT tandamien confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport AT bruggewilliamr confocalendomicroscopyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionsasystematicreviewandinternationaldelphiconsensusreport |