Cargando…
Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnosti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027 |
_version_ | 1783598985455337472 |
---|---|
author | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Ofosu, Andrew Dhaliwal, Amaninder S. Shah, Aun R. Bhogal, Neil Mashiana, Harmeet S. Mashiana, Simran S. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Facciorusso, Antonio Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Witt, Benjamin L. Adler, Douglas G. |
author_facet | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Ofosu, Andrew Dhaliwal, Amaninder S. Shah, Aun R. Bhogal, Neil Mashiana, Harmeet S. Mashiana, Simran S. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Facciorusso, Antonio Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Witt, Benjamin L. Adler, Douglas G. |
author_sort | Chandan, Saurabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. An alternative to ROSE is liquid-based cytology (LBC). Commonly used LBC techniques include precipitation-based (SurePath™) and filtration-based (ThinPrep (®) , CellPrep (®) ). Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of LBC compared with CS are limited. Methods Multiple databases were searched through March 2020 to identify studies reporting diagnostic yield of EUS-guided CS and LBC in pancreatic lesions. Pooled diagnostic odds and rates of performance for the cytologic diagnoses of benign, suspicious, and malignant lesions were calculated. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by pooled rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results Nine studies with a total of 1308 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled diagnostic odds of CS cytology were 1.69 (CI 1.02–2.79) and 0.39 (CI 0.19–0.8) for malignant lesions when compared to filtration-based and precipitation-based LBC techniques, respectively. For CS, precipitation-based and filtration-based LBC, pooled diagnostic accuracy was 79.7 %, 85.2 %, 77.3 %, sensitivity was 79.2 %, 83.6 %, 68.3 %, and specificity was 99.4 %, 99.5 %, 99.5 %, respectively. Conclusions The precipitation-based LBC technique (SurePath™) had superior diagnostic odds for malignant pancreatic lesions compared with CS cytology in the absence of ROSE. It showed superior accuracy and sensitivity, but comparable specificity and PPV. Diagnostic odds of CS cytology in the absence of ROSE were superior to the filtration-based LBC technique (ThinPrep (®) , Cellprep (®) ) for diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75814732020-11-01 Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Ofosu, Andrew Dhaliwal, Amaninder S. Shah, Aun R. Bhogal, Neil Mashiana, Harmeet S. Mashiana, Simran S. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Facciorusso, Antonio Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Witt, Benjamin L. Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. An alternative to ROSE is liquid-based cytology (LBC). Commonly used LBC techniques include precipitation-based (SurePath™) and filtration-based (ThinPrep (®) , CellPrep (®) ). Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of LBC compared with CS are limited. Methods Multiple databases were searched through March 2020 to identify studies reporting diagnostic yield of EUS-guided CS and LBC in pancreatic lesions. Pooled diagnostic odds and rates of performance for the cytologic diagnoses of benign, suspicious, and malignant lesions were calculated. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by pooled rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results Nine studies with a total of 1308 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled diagnostic odds of CS cytology were 1.69 (CI 1.02–2.79) and 0.39 (CI 0.19–0.8) for malignant lesions when compared to filtration-based and precipitation-based LBC techniques, respectively. For CS, precipitation-based and filtration-based LBC, pooled diagnostic accuracy was 79.7 %, 85.2 %, 77.3 %, sensitivity was 79.2 %, 83.6 %, 68.3 %, and specificity was 99.4 %, 99.5 %, 99.5 %, respectively. Conclusions The precipitation-based LBC technique (SurePath™) had superior diagnostic odds for malignant pancreatic lesions compared with CS cytology in the absence of ROSE. It showed superior accuracy and sensitivity, but comparable specificity and PPV. Diagnostic odds of CS cytology in the absence of ROSE were superior to the filtration-based LBC technique (ThinPrep (®) , Cellprep (®) ) for diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-11 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7581473/ /pubmed/33140017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Ofosu, Andrew Dhaliwal, Amaninder S. Shah, Aun R. Bhogal, Neil Mashiana, Harmeet S. Mashiana, Simran S. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Facciorusso, Antonio Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Witt, Benjamin L. Adler, Douglas G. Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of eus-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandansaurabh comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohanbabup comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khanshahabr comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ofosuandrew comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dhaliwalamaninders comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shahaunr comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bhogalneil comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mashianaharmeets comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mashianasimrans comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kassablenal comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ponnadasuresh comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT facciorussoantonio comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bhatishfaq comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singhshailender comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wittbenjaminl comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT adlerdouglasg comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |