Cargando…

Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandan, Saurabh, Mohan, Babu P., Khan, Shahab R., Ofosu, Andrew, Dhaliwal, Amaninder S., Shah, Aun R., Bhogal, Neil, Mashiana, Harmeet S., Mashiana, Simran S., Kassab, Lena L., Ponnada, Suresh, Facciorusso, Antonio, Bhat, Ishfaq, Singh, Shailender, Witt, Benjamin L., Adler, Douglas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027
_version_ 1783598985455337472
author Chandan, Saurabh
Mohan, Babu P.
Khan, Shahab R.
Ofosu, Andrew
Dhaliwal, Amaninder S.
Shah, Aun R.
Bhogal, Neil
Mashiana, Harmeet S.
Mashiana, Simran S.
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Facciorusso, Antonio
Bhat, Ishfaq
Singh, Shailender
Witt, Benjamin L.
Adler, Douglas G.
author_facet Chandan, Saurabh
Mohan, Babu P.
Khan, Shahab R.
Ofosu, Andrew
Dhaliwal, Amaninder S.
Shah, Aun R.
Bhogal, Neil
Mashiana, Harmeet S.
Mashiana, Simran S.
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Facciorusso, Antonio
Bhat, Ishfaq
Singh, Shailender
Witt, Benjamin L.
Adler, Douglas G.
author_sort Chandan, Saurabh
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. An alternative to ROSE is liquid-based cytology (LBC). Commonly used LBC techniques include precipitation-based (SurePath™) and filtration-based (ThinPrep (®) , CellPrep (®) ). Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of LBC compared with CS are limited. Methods  Multiple databases were searched through March 2020 to identify studies reporting diagnostic yield of EUS-guided CS and LBC in pancreatic lesions. Pooled diagnostic odds and rates of performance for the cytologic diagnoses of benign, suspicious, and malignant lesions were calculated. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by pooled rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results  Nine studies with a total of 1308 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled diagnostic odds of CS cytology were 1.69 (CI 1.02–2.79) and 0.39 (CI 0.19–0.8) for malignant lesions when compared to filtration-based and precipitation-based LBC techniques, respectively. For CS, precipitation-based and filtration-based LBC, pooled diagnostic accuracy was 79.7 %, 85.2 %, 77.3 %, sensitivity was 79.2 %, 83.6 %, 68.3 %, and specificity was 99.4 %, 99.5 %, 99.5 %, respectively. Conclusions  The precipitation-based LBC technique (SurePath™) had superior diagnostic odds for malignant pancreatic lesions compared with CS cytology in the absence of ROSE. It showed superior accuracy and sensitivity, but comparable specificity and PPV. Diagnostic odds of CS cytology in the absence of ROSE were superior to the filtration-based LBC technique (ThinPrep (®) , Cellprep (®) ) for diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75814732020-11-01 Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Ofosu, Andrew Dhaliwal, Amaninder S. Shah, Aun R. Bhogal, Neil Mashiana, Harmeet S. Mashiana, Simran S. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Facciorusso, Antonio Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Witt, Benjamin L. Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. An alternative to ROSE is liquid-based cytology (LBC). Commonly used LBC techniques include precipitation-based (SurePath™) and filtration-based (ThinPrep (®) , CellPrep (®) ). Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of LBC compared with CS are limited. Methods  Multiple databases were searched through March 2020 to identify studies reporting diagnostic yield of EUS-guided CS and LBC in pancreatic lesions. Pooled diagnostic odds and rates of performance for the cytologic diagnoses of benign, suspicious, and malignant lesions were calculated. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by pooled rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results  Nine studies with a total of 1308 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled diagnostic odds of CS cytology were 1.69 (CI 1.02–2.79) and 0.39 (CI 0.19–0.8) for malignant lesions when compared to filtration-based and precipitation-based LBC techniques, respectively. For CS, precipitation-based and filtration-based LBC, pooled diagnostic accuracy was 79.7 %, 85.2 %, 77.3 %, sensitivity was 79.2 %, 83.6 %, 68.3 %, and specificity was 99.4 %, 99.5 %, 99.5 %, respectively. Conclusions  The precipitation-based LBC technique (SurePath™) had superior diagnostic odds for malignant pancreatic lesions compared with CS cytology in the absence of ROSE. It showed superior accuracy and sensitivity, but comparable specificity and PPV. Diagnostic odds of CS cytology in the absence of ROSE were superior to the filtration-based LBC technique (ThinPrep (®) , Cellprep (®) ) for diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-11 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7581473/ /pubmed/33140017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Chandan, Saurabh
Mohan, Babu P.
Khan, Shahab R.
Ofosu, Andrew
Dhaliwal, Amaninder S.
Shah, Aun R.
Bhogal, Neil
Mashiana, Harmeet S.
Mashiana, Simran S.
Kassab, Lena L.
Ponnada, Suresh
Facciorusso, Antonio
Bhat, Ishfaq
Singh, Shailender
Witt, Benjamin L.
Adler, Douglas G.
Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of eus-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1240-0027
work_keys_str_mv AT chandansaurabh comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohanbabup comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khanshahabr comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ofosuandrew comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dhaliwalamaninders comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shahaunr comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhogalneil comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mashianaharmeets comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mashianasimrans comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kassablenal comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ponnadasuresh comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT facciorussoantonio comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhatishfaq comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhshailender comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wittbenjaminl comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adlerdouglasg comparisonofeusguidedconventionalsmearandliquidbasedcytologyinpancreaticlesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis