Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a minimal-invasive therapeutic option to surgery and in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The aim of this review was to quantitatively appraise the clinical outcomes of EUS-P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1236-3350 |
_version_ | 1783598986176757760 |
---|---|
author | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Ofosu, Andrew Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Adler, Douglas G. |
author_facet | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Ofosu, Andrew Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Adler, Douglas G. |
author_sort | Chandan, Saurabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a minimal-invasive therapeutic option to surgery and in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The aim of this review was to quantitatively appraise the clinical outcomes of EUS-PDD by meta-analysis methods. Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through March 2020 to identify studies that reported on EUS-PDD. Pooled rates of technical success, successful drainage of pancreatic duct, clinical success, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I (2) % and 95 % prediction interval. Results A total of 22 studies (714 patients) were included. The pooled rate of technical success in EUS-PDD was 84.8 % (95 % CI 79.1–89.2). The pooled rate of successful PD drained by EUS-PDD was 77.5 % (95 % CI 63.1–87.4). The pooled rate of clinical success of EUS-PDD was 89.2 % (95 % CI 82.1–93.7). The pooled rate of all adverse events was 18.1 % (95 % CI 14.2–22.9). On sub-group analysis, the pooled technical success and clinical success of EUS-PDD from Japanese data were considerably superior (91.2 %, 83–95.6 & 92.5 %, 83.9–96.7, respectively). The pooled rate of post EUS-PDD acute pancreatitis was 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.5–9.4), bleeding was 4.1 % (95 % CI 2.7–6.2), perforation and/or pneumoperitoneum was 3.1 % (95 % CI 1.9–5), pancreatic leak and/or pancreatic fluid collection was 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.4–4), and infection was 2.8 % (95 % CI 1.7–4.6). Conclusion EUS-PDD demonstrates high technical success and clinical success rates with acceptable adverse events. Technical success was especially high for anastomotic strictures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7581476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75814762020-11-01 Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Ofosu, Andrew Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a minimal-invasive therapeutic option to surgery and in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The aim of this review was to quantitatively appraise the clinical outcomes of EUS-PDD by meta-analysis methods. Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through March 2020 to identify studies that reported on EUS-PDD. Pooled rates of technical success, successful drainage of pancreatic duct, clinical success, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I (2) % and 95 % prediction interval. Results A total of 22 studies (714 patients) were included. The pooled rate of technical success in EUS-PDD was 84.8 % (95 % CI 79.1–89.2). The pooled rate of successful PD drained by EUS-PDD was 77.5 % (95 % CI 63.1–87.4). The pooled rate of clinical success of EUS-PDD was 89.2 % (95 % CI 82.1–93.7). The pooled rate of all adverse events was 18.1 % (95 % CI 14.2–22.9). On sub-group analysis, the pooled technical success and clinical success of EUS-PDD from Japanese data were considerably superior (91.2 %, 83–95.6 & 92.5 %, 83.9–96.7, respectively). The pooled rate of post EUS-PDD acute pancreatitis was 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.5–9.4), bleeding was 4.1 % (95 % CI 2.7–6.2), perforation and/or pneumoperitoneum was 3.1 % (95 % CI 1.9–5), pancreatic leak and/or pancreatic fluid collection was 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.4–4), and infection was 2.8 % (95 % CI 1.7–4.6). Conclusion EUS-PDD demonstrates high technical success and clinical success rates with acceptable adverse events. Technical success was especially high for anastomotic strictures. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-11 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7581476/ /pubmed/33140022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1236-3350 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab R. Kassab, Lena L. Ponnada, Suresh Ofosu, Andrew Bhat, Ishfaq Singh, Shailender Adler, Douglas G. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (eus-pdd): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1236-3350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandansaurabh efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT mohanbabup efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT khanshahabr efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT kassablenal efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT ponnadasuresh efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT ofosuandrew efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT bhatishfaq efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT singhshailender efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients AT adlerdouglasg efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicultrasoundguidedpancreaticductdrainageeuspddasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof714patients |