Cargando…

Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is validated for measuring quality of colonoscopy, however there is lack of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in South Asia. The purpose of this study is to analyze and review the polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR and provide insight i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousaf, Mian Shah, Shafqat, Shameel, Gill, Roger Christopher, Khursheed, Asfia Arham, Parkash, Om
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1244-1646
_version_ 1783598988076777472
author Yousaf, Mian Shah
Shafqat, Shameel
Gill, Roger Christopher
Khursheed, Asfia Arham
Parkash, Om
author_facet Yousaf, Mian Shah
Shafqat, Shameel
Gill, Roger Christopher
Khursheed, Asfia Arham
Parkash, Om
author_sort Yousaf, Mian Shah
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is validated for measuring quality of colonoscopy, however there is lack of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in South Asia. The purpose of this study is to analyze and review the polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR and provide insight into the factors that influence them in Pakistan. Patients and methods  This retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, on patients ≥ 18 years, who underwent colonoscopy between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Results  Of 1985 patients, 59 % were male and 41 % female, with mean age of 47.8 ± 16.2 years. The most common indication for colonoscopy was bleeding-per-rectum (28.0 %) and overall PDR and ADR were 17.9 % and 9.9 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between genders for either PDR ( P  = 0.378) or ADR ( P  = 0.574). Significantly higher PDR and ADR were found for patients ≥ 50 years ( P  < 0.001), as well as for suboptimal bowel preparation [PDR (25.7 %; P  = 0.007) and ADR (18.6 %; P  = 0.014)]. Interestingly, endoscopists with < 500 colonoscopy-procedural-experience reported a higher PDR (21.6 %; P  = 0.020) and ADR (14.4 %; P = 0.049), corresponding to a significantly higher PDR (20.6 %; P  = 0.005) and ADR (11.7 %; P  = 0.02) for endoscopists in practice for ≤ 10 years. Conclusions  We have noticed low PDR and ADR, which require further investigation and research. In addition, we believe there should be a different baseline ADR and PDR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy in our region, where no internationally recommended colonoscopic screening programs have been implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7581484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75814842020-11-01 Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan Yousaf, Mian Shah Shafqat, Shameel Gill, Roger Christopher Khursheed, Asfia Arham Parkash, Om Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is validated for measuring quality of colonoscopy, however there is lack of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in South Asia. The purpose of this study is to analyze and review the polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR and provide insight into the factors that influence them in Pakistan. Patients and methods  This retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, on patients ≥ 18 years, who underwent colonoscopy between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Results  Of 1985 patients, 59 % were male and 41 % female, with mean age of 47.8 ± 16.2 years. The most common indication for colonoscopy was bleeding-per-rectum (28.0 %) and overall PDR and ADR were 17.9 % and 9.9 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between genders for either PDR ( P  = 0.378) or ADR ( P  = 0.574). Significantly higher PDR and ADR were found for patients ≥ 50 years ( P  < 0.001), as well as for suboptimal bowel preparation [PDR (25.7 %; P  = 0.007) and ADR (18.6 %; P  = 0.014)]. Interestingly, endoscopists with < 500 colonoscopy-procedural-experience reported a higher PDR (21.6 %; P  = 0.020) and ADR (14.4 %; P = 0.049), corresponding to a significantly higher PDR (20.6 %; P  = 0.005) and ADR (11.7 %; P  = 0.02) for endoscopists in practice for ≤ 10 years. Conclusions  We have noticed low PDR and ADR, which require further investigation and research. In addition, we believe there should be a different baseline ADR and PDR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy in our region, where no internationally recommended colonoscopic screening programs have been implemented. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-11 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7581484/ /pubmed/33140028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1244-1646 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Yousaf, Mian Shah
Shafqat, Shameel
Gill, Roger Christopher
Khursheed, Asfia Arham
Parkash, Om
Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title_full Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title_fullStr Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title_full_unstemmed Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title_short Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan
title_sort adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in pakistan
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1244-1646
work_keys_str_mv AT yousafmianshah adenomadetectionrateasaqualityindicatorforcolonoscopyadescriptivecrosssectionalstudyfromatertiarycarehospitalinpakistan
AT shafqatshameel adenomadetectionrateasaqualityindicatorforcolonoscopyadescriptivecrosssectionalstudyfromatertiarycarehospitalinpakistan
AT gillrogerchristopher adenomadetectionrateasaqualityindicatorforcolonoscopyadescriptivecrosssectionalstudyfromatertiarycarehospitalinpakistan
AT khursheedasfiaarham adenomadetectionrateasaqualityindicatorforcolonoscopyadescriptivecrosssectionalstudyfromatertiarycarehospitalinpakistan
AT parkashom adenomadetectionrateasaqualityindicatorforcolonoscopyadescriptivecrosssectionalstudyfromatertiarycarehospitalinpakistan