Cargando…

Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen ([(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) PET for imaging of thyroid cancer: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in the microvasculature of thyroid cancer. This suggests the potential use of PSMA as a diagnostic agent in patients with aggressive forms of thyroid cancer. The purpose of the current study was to determine the feasibility and utili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lawhn-Heath, Courtney, Yom, Sue S., Liu, Chienying, Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E., Aslam, Maya, Smith, Raven, Narwal, Manpreet, Juarez, Roxanna, Behr, Spencer C., Pampaloni, Miguel Hernandez, Chan, Jason W., Glastonbury, Christine M., Hope, Thomas A., Flavell, Robert R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7581659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33090273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00720-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in the microvasculature of thyroid cancer. This suggests the potential use of PSMA as a diagnostic agent in patients with aggressive forms of thyroid cancer. The purpose of the current study was to determine the feasibility and utility of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in thyroid cancer patients. METHODS: Eligible patients for this prospective pilot study were adults with a history of pathology-proven thyroid cancer who had abnormal radiotracer uptake on an 2-[(18)F]FDG PET and/or (131)I scintigraphy performed in the 12 months prior to study enrollment. Patients underwent a [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI, and comparison was made to the prior qualifying 2-[(18)F]FDG PET CT/MRI for lesion location and relative intensity. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI, one of which was excluded from analysis due to debulking surgery prior to the PSMA PET. Of the remaining patients, 7/11 had differentiated disease (3 papillary, 2 follicular, 2 Hurthle cell) and 4/11 had dedifferentiated disease (2 poorly differentiated papillary, 2 anaplastic). Out of 43 lesions, 41 were visually 2-[(18)F]FDG positive (uptake greater than background, detection rate 95.3%) and 28 were PSMA positive (uptake greater than background, detection rate 65.1%). Uptake was heterogeneous between patients, and in some cases within patients. 3/11 patients (1 poorly differentiated papillary, 2 follicular) had PSMA uptake which was greater than FDG uptake. For the remaining 8 patients, 2-[(18)F]FDG uptake was greater than PSMA. Using one eligibility guideline in the prostate cancer literature for PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT), 8/11 could be considered eligible for possible future PSMA RLT. This was not predictable based on thyroid cancer subtype. CONCLUSIONS: [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated lower detection rate when compared to 2-[(18)F]FDG PET for thyroid cancer lesion visualization. Thyroid cancer subtype alone may not be sufficient to predict PSMA uptake, and radiotracer uptake may vary between patients and even within patients.