Cargando…
Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors
Quantitative assessments of patient movement quality in osteoarthritis (OA), specifically spatiotemporal gait parameters (STGPs), can provide in-depth insight into gait patterns, activity types, and changes in mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A study was conducted to benchmark the abili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20195553 |
_version_ | 1783599146575331328 |
---|---|
author | Sharifi Renani, Mohsen Myers, Casey A. Zandie, Rohola Mahoor, Mohammad H. Davidson, Bradley S. Clary, Chadd W. |
author_facet | Sharifi Renani, Mohsen Myers, Casey A. Zandie, Rohola Mahoor, Mohammad H. Davidson, Bradley S. Clary, Chadd W. |
author_sort | Sharifi Renani, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative assessments of patient movement quality in osteoarthritis (OA), specifically spatiotemporal gait parameters (STGPs), can provide in-depth insight into gait patterns, activity types, and changes in mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A study was conducted to benchmark the ability of multiple deep neural network (DNN) architectures to predict 12 STGPs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) data and to identify an optimal sensor combination, which has yet to be studied for OA and TKA subjects. DNNs were trained using movement data from 29 subjects, walking at slow, normal, and fast paces and evaluated with cross-fold validation over the subjects. Optimal sensor locations were determined by comparing prediction accuracy with 15 IMU configurations (pelvis, thigh, shank, and feet). Percent error across the 12 STGPs ranged from 2.1% (stride time) to 73.7% (toe-out angle) and overall was more accurate in temporal parameters than spatial parameters. The most and least accurate sensor combinations were feet-thighs and singular pelvis, respectively. DNNs showed promising results in predicting STGPs for OA and TKA subjects based on signals from IMU sensors and overcomes the dependency on sensor locations that can hinder the design of patient monitoring systems for clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7582246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75822462020-10-28 Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors Sharifi Renani, Mohsen Myers, Casey A. Zandie, Rohola Mahoor, Mohammad H. Davidson, Bradley S. Clary, Chadd W. Sensors (Basel) Article Quantitative assessments of patient movement quality in osteoarthritis (OA), specifically spatiotemporal gait parameters (STGPs), can provide in-depth insight into gait patterns, activity types, and changes in mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A study was conducted to benchmark the ability of multiple deep neural network (DNN) architectures to predict 12 STGPs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) data and to identify an optimal sensor combination, which has yet to be studied for OA and TKA subjects. DNNs were trained using movement data from 29 subjects, walking at slow, normal, and fast paces and evaluated with cross-fold validation over the subjects. Optimal sensor locations were determined by comparing prediction accuracy with 15 IMU configurations (pelvis, thigh, shank, and feet). Percent error across the 12 STGPs ranged from 2.1% (stride time) to 73.7% (toe-out angle) and overall was more accurate in temporal parameters than spatial parameters. The most and least accurate sensor combinations were feet-thighs and singular pelvis, respectively. DNNs showed promising results in predicting STGPs for OA and TKA subjects based on signals from IMU sensors and overcomes the dependency on sensor locations that can hinder the design of patient monitoring systems for clinical application. MDPI 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7582246/ /pubmed/32998329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20195553 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sharifi Renani, Mohsen Myers, Casey A. Zandie, Rohola Mahoor, Mohammad H. Davidson, Bradley S. Clary, Chadd W. Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title | Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title_full | Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title_short | Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors |
title_sort | deep learning in gait parameter prediction for oa and tka patients wearing imu sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20195553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharifirenanimohsen deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors AT myerscaseya deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors AT zandierohola deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors AT mahoormohammadh deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors AT davidsonbradleys deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors AT clarychaddw deeplearningingaitparameterpredictionforoaandtkapatientswearingimusensors |