Cargando…
Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012 |
_version_ | 1783599175931265024 |
---|---|
author | Genova, Tullio Roato, Ilaria Carossa, Massimo Motta, Chiara Cavagnetto, Davide Mussano, Federico |
author_facet | Genova, Tullio Roato, Ilaria Carossa, Massimo Motta, Chiara Cavagnetto, Davide Mussano, Federico |
author_sort | Genova, Tullio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue engineering is a branch of regenerative medicine that aims to find new solutions to treat bone defects, which can be repaired by 3D printed living tissues. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of conventional treatment options by improving osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques of bone bioprinting have been developed: inkjet, extrusion, and light-based 3D printers are nowadays available. Bioinks, i.e., the printing materials, also presented an evolution over the years. It seems that these new technologies might be extremely promising for bone regeneration. The purpose of the present review is to give a comprehensive summary of the past, the present, and future developments of bone bioprinting and bioinks, focusing the attention on crucial aspects of bone bioprinting such as selecting cell sources and attaining a viable vascularization within the newly printed bone. The main bioprinters currently available on the market and their characteristics have been taken into consideration, as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7582371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75823712020-10-28 Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting Genova, Tullio Roato, Ilaria Carossa, Massimo Motta, Chiara Cavagnetto, Davide Mussano, Federico Int J Mol Sci Review Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue engineering is a branch of regenerative medicine that aims to find new solutions to treat bone defects, which can be repaired by 3D printed living tissues. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of conventional treatment options by improving osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques of bone bioprinting have been developed: inkjet, extrusion, and light-based 3D printers are nowadays available. Bioinks, i.e., the printing materials, also presented an evolution over the years. It seems that these new technologies might be extremely promising for bone regeneration. The purpose of the present review is to give a comprehensive summary of the past, the present, and future developments of bone bioprinting and bioinks, focusing the attention on crucial aspects of bone bioprinting such as selecting cell sources and attaining a viable vascularization within the newly printed bone. The main bioprinters currently available on the market and their characteristics have been taken into consideration, as well. MDPI 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7582371/ /pubmed/32977633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Genova, Tullio Roato, Ilaria Carossa, Massimo Motta, Chiara Cavagnetto, Davide Mussano, Federico Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title | Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title_full | Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title_fullStr | Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title_full_unstemmed | Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title_short | Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting |
title_sort | advances on bone substitutes through 3d bioprinting |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genovatullio advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting AT roatoilaria advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting AT carossamassimo advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting AT mottachiara advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting AT cavagnettodavide advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting AT mussanofederico advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting |