Cargando…

Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting

Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Genova, Tullio, Roato, Ilaria, Carossa, Massimo, Motta, Chiara, Cavagnetto, Davide, Mussano, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012
_version_ 1783599175931265024
author Genova, Tullio
Roato, Ilaria
Carossa, Massimo
Motta, Chiara
Cavagnetto, Davide
Mussano, Federico
author_facet Genova, Tullio
Roato, Ilaria
Carossa, Massimo
Motta, Chiara
Cavagnetto, Davide
Mussano, Federico
author_sort Genova, Tullio
collection PubMed
description Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue engineering is a branch of regenerative medicine that aims to find new solutions to treat bone defects, which can be repaired by 3D printed living tissues. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of conventional treatment options by improving osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques of bone bioprinting have been developed: inkjet, extrusion, and light-based 3D printers are nowadays available. Bioinks, i.e., the printing materials, also presented an evolution over the years. It seems that these new technologies might be extremely promising for bone regeneration. The purpose of the present review is to give a comprehensive summary of the past, the present, and future developments of bone bioprinting and bioinks, focusing the attention on crucial aspects of bone bioprinting such as selecting cell sources and attaining a viable vascularization within the newly printed bone. The main bioprinters currently available on the market and their characteristics have been taken into consideration, as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7582371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75823712020-10-28 Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting Genova, Tullio Roato, Ilaria Carossa, Massimo Motta, Chiara Cavagnetto, Davide Mussano, Federico Int J Mol Sci Review Reconstruction of bony defects is challenging when conventional grafting methods are used because of their intrinsic limitations (biological cost and/or biological properties). Bone regeneration techniques are rapidly evolving since the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Bone tissue engineering is a branch of regenerative medicine that aims to find new solutions to treat bone defects, which can be repaired by 3D printed living tissues. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of conventional treatment options by improving osteoinduction and osteoconduction. Several techniques of bone bioprinting have been developed: inkjet, extrusion, and light-based 3D printers are nowadays available. Bioinks, i.e., the printing materials, also presented an evolution over the years. It seems that these new technologies might be extremely promising for bone regeneration. The purpose of the present review is to give a comprehensive summary of the past, the present, and future developments of bone bioprinting and bioinks, focusing the attention on crucial aspects of bone bioprinting such as selecting cell sources and attaining a viable vascularization within the newly printed bone. The main bioprinters currently available on the market and their characteristics have been taken into consideration, as well. MDPI 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7582371/ /pubmed/32977633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Genova, Tullio
Roato, Ilaria
Carossa, Massimo
Motta, Chiara
Cavagnetto, Davide
Mussano, Federico
Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title_full Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title_fullStr Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title_full_unstemmed Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title_short Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting
title_sort advances on bone substitutes through 3d bioprinting
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32977633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012
work_keys_str_mv AT genovatullio advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting
AT roatoilaria advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting
AT carossamassimo advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting
AT mottachiara advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting
AT cavagnettodavide advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting
AT mussanofederico advancesonbonesubstitutesthrough3dbioprinting