Cargando…

Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy interventions are resource-intensive and should be targeted to those at risk of negative health outcomes. Our aim was to develop and internally validate prognostic models to predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the combined outcome of falls, hospitalisation, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Beate S, Uhlmann, Lorenz, Ihle, Peter, Stock, Christian, von Buedingen, Fiona, Beyer, Martin, Gerlach, Ferdinand M, Perera, Rafael, Valderas, Jose Maria, Glasziou, Paul, van den Akker, Marjan, Muth, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039747
_version_ 1783599336903409664
author Müller, Beate S
Uhlmann, Lorenz
Ihle, Peter
Stock, Christian
von Buedingen, Fiona
Beyer, Martin
Gerlach, Ferdinand M
Perera, Rafael
Valderas, Jose Maria
Glasziou, Paul
van den Akker, Marjan
Muth, Christiane
author_facet Müller, Beate S
Uhlmann, Lorenz
Ihle, Peter
Stock, Christian
von Buedingen, Fiona
Beyer, Martin
Gerlach, Ferdinand M
Perera, Rafael
Valderas, Jose Maria
Glasziou, Paul
van den Akker, Marjan
Muth, Christiane
author_sort Müller, Beate S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy interventions are resource-intensive and should be targeted to those at risk of negative health outcomes. Our aim was to develop and internally validate prognostic models to predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the combined outcome of falls, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and nursing care needs, in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practices. METHODS: Design: two independent data sets, one comprising health insurance claims data (n=592 456), the other data from the PRIoritising MUltimedication in Multimorbidity (PRIMUM) cluster randomised controlled trial (n=502). Population: ≥60 years, ≥5 drugs, ≥3 chronic diseases, excluding dementia. Outcomes: combined outcome of falls, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and nursing care needs (after 6, 9 and 24 months) (claims data); and HRQoL (after 6 and 9 months) (trial data). Predictor variables in both data sets: age, sex, morbidity-related variables (disease count), medication-related variables (European Union-Potentially Inappropriate Medication list (EU-PIM list)) and health service utilisation. Predictor variables exclusively in trial data: additional socio-demographics, morbidity-related variables (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, depression), Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), lifestyle, functional status and HRQoL (EuroQol EQ-5D-3L). Analysis: mixed regression models, combined with stepwise variable selection, 10-fold cross validation and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Most important predictors of EQ-5D-3L at 6 months in best model (Nagelkerke’s R² 0.507) were depressive symptoms (−2.73 (95% CI: −3.56 to −1.91)), MAI (−0.39 (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.08)), baseline EQ-5D-3L (0.55 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64)). Models based on claims data and those predicting long-term outcomes based on both data sets produced low R² values. In claims data-based model with highest explanatory power (R²=0.16), previous falls/fall-related injuries, previous hospitalisations, age, number of involved physicians and disease count were most important predictor variables. CONCLUSIONS: Best trial data-based model predicted HRQoL after 6 months well and included parameters of well-being not found in claims. Performance of claims data-based models and models predicting long-term outcomes was relatively weak. For generalisability, future studies should refit models by considering parameters representing well-being and functional status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7583076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75830762020-10-28 Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice Müller, Beate S Uhlmann, Lorenz Ihle, Peter Stock, Christian von Buedingen, Fiona Beyer, Martin Gerlach, Ferdinand M Perera, Rafael Valderas, Jose Maria Glasziou, Paul van den Akker, Marjan Muth, Christiane BMJ Open General practice / Family practice BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy interventions are resource-intensive and should be targeted to those at risk of negative health outcomes. Our aim was to develop and internally validate prognostic models to predict health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the combined outcome of falls, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and nursing care needs, in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practices. METHODS: Design: two independent data sets, one comprising health insurance claims data (n=592 456), the other data from the PRIoritising MUltimedication in Multimorbidity (PRIMUM) cluster randomised controlled trial (n=502). Population: ≥60 years, ≥5 drugs, ≥3 chronic diseases, excluding dementia. Outcomes: combined outcome of falls, hospitalisation, institutionalisation and nursing care needs (after 6, 9 and 24 months) (claims data); and HRQoL (after 6 and 9 months) (trial data). Predictor variables in both data sets: age, sex, morbidity-related variables (disease count), medication-related variables (European Union-Potentially Inappropriate Medication list (EU-PIM list)) and health service utilisation. Predictor variables exclusively in trial data: additional socio-demographics, morbidity-related variables (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, depression), Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), lifestyle, functional status and HRQoL (EuroQol EQ-5D-3L). Analysis: mixed regression models, combined with stepwise variable selection, 10-fold cross validation and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Most important predictors of EQ-5D-3L at 6 months in best model (Nagelkerke’s R² 0.507) were depressive symptoms (−2.73 (95% CI: −3.56 to −1.91)), MAI (−0.39 (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.08)), baseline EQ-5D-3L (0.55 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64)). Models based on claims data and those predicting long-term outcomes based on both data sets produced low R² values. In claims data-based model with highest explanatory power (R²=0.16), previous falls/fall-related injuries, previous hospitalisations, age, number of involved physicians and disease count were most important predictor variables. CONCLUSIONS: Best trial data-based model predicted HRQoL after 6 months well and included parameters of well-being not found in claims. Performance of claims data-based models and models predicting long-term outcomes was relatively weak. For generalisability, future studies should refit models by considering parameters representing well-being and functional status. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7583076/ /pubmed/33093036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039747 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Müller, Beate S
Uhlmann, Lorenz
Ihle, Peter
Stock, Christian
von Buedingen, Fiona
Beyer, Martin
Gerlach, Ferdinand M
Perera, Rafael
Valderas, Jose Maria
Glasziou, Paul
van den Akker, Marjan
Muth, Christiane
Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title_full Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title_fullStr Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title_short Development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
title_sort development and internal validation of prognostic models to predict negative health outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039747
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerbeates developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT uhlmannlorenz developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT ihlepeter developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT stockchristian developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT vonbuedingenfiona developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT beyermartin developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT gerlachferdinandm developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT pererarafael developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT valderasjosemaria developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT glaszioupaul developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT vandenakkermarjan developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice
AT muthchristiane developmentandinternalvalidationofprognosticmodelstopredictnegativehealthoutcomesinolderpatientswithmultimorbidityandpolypharmacyingeneralpractice