Cargando…

Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Particularly at transitions of care points information concerning current medication tends to be incomplete. A medication chart that contains all essential information on current therapy is likely to be a helpful tool for patients and healthcare providers. We aimed to investigate any typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietrich, Fine Michèle, Hersberger, Kurt E, Arnet, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037668
_version_ 1783599337373171712
author Dietrich, Fine Michèle
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
author_facet Dietrich, Fine Michèle
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
author_sort Dietrich, Fine Michèle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Particularly at transitions of care points information concerning current medication tends to be incomplete. A medication chart that contains all essential information on current therapy is likely to be a helpful tool for patients and healthcare providers. We aimed to investigate any type of benefits associated with medication charts provided at transition points. METHODS: A systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. Two databases, two online journals and two association websites dedicated to biomedicine and pharmacy issues were consulted to identify studies for the review using the search term ‘medication chart’ and synonyms. We run our search from database inception up to March 2019. Studies of any study design, intervention and population which examined the effect of paper-based medication charts were included. We extracted study results narratively and coded and classified them by themes and categories inductively by using the ‘framework method’ with content analysis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. RESULTS: From the 846 retrieved articles, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly from Germany (18 studies) and the USA (5 studies). Thirteen studies reported a statistically significant result. In the ‘patient theme’, the most obvious benefits were an increase in medication knowledge, a reduction of medication errors and higher medication adherence. In the ‘interdisciplinary theme’, a medication chart represented a helpful tool to increase communication and inter-sectoral cooperation between healthcare providers. In the ‘theme of terms and conditions’, accuracy and currency of data are prerequisites for any positive effect. The quality of the studies was classified predominantly weak mainly due to unmet good quality criteria (no randomised controlled trials study design, no reported dropouts). CONCLUSION: Overall, the reviewed studies suggested some benefits when using medication charts. Healthcare providers could consider using medication charts in their counselling practice. However, it is unknown whether the reported benefits lead to measurable improvement in clinical outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7583078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75830782020-10-28 Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review Dietrich, Fine Michèle Hersberger, Kurt E Arnet, Isabelle BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Particularly at transitions of care points information concerning current medication tends to be incomplete. A medication chart that contains all essential information on current therapy is likely to be a helpful tool for patients and healthcare providers. We aimed to investigate any type of benefits associated with medication charts provided at transition points. METHODS: A systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. Two databases, two online journals and two association websites dedicated to biomedicine and pharmacy issues were consulted to identify studies for the review using the search term ‘medication chart’ and synonyms. We run our search from database inception up to March 2019. Studies of any study design, intervention and population which examined the effect of paper-based medication charts were included. We extracted study results narratively and coded and classified them by themes and categories inductively by using the ‘framework method’ with content analysis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. RESULTS: From the 846 retrieved articles, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly from Germany (18 studies) and the USA (5 studies). Thirteen studies reported a statistically significant result. In the ‘patient theme’, the most obvious benefits were an increase in medication knowledge, a reduction of medication errors and higher medication adherence. In the ‘interdisciplinary theme’, a medication chart represented a helpful tool to increase communication and inter-sectoral cooperation between healthcare providers. In the ‘theme of terms and conditions’, accuracy and currency of data are prerequisites for any positive effect. The quality of the studies was classified predominantly weak mainly due to unmet good quality criteria (no randomised controlled trials study design, no reported dropouts). CONCLUSION: Overall, the reviewed studies suggested some benefits when using medication charts. Healthcare providers could consider using medication charts in their counselling practice. However, it is unknown whether the reported benefits lead to measurable improvement in clinical outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7583078/ /pubmed/33093031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037668 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Dietrich, Fine Michèle
Hersberger, Kurt E
Arnet, Isabelle
Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title_full Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title_fullStr Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title_short Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
title_sort benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037668
work_keys_str_mv AT dietrichfinemichele benefitsofmedicationchartsprovidedattransitionsofcareanarrativesystematicreview
AT hersbergerkurte benefitsofmedicationchartsprovidedattransitionsofcareanarrativesystematicreview
AT arnetisabelle benefitsofmedicationchartsprovidedattransitionsofcareanarrativesystematicreview