Cargando…
The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044 |
_version_ | 1783599342444085248 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Chang Wook Herlemann, Annika Cowan, Janet E Broering, Jeanette M ten Ham, Renske M T Wilson, Leslie S Carroll, Peter R Cooperberg, Matthew R |
author_facet | Jeong, Chang Wook Herlemann, Annika Cowan, Janet E Broering, Jeanette M ten Ham, Renske M T Wilson, Leslie S Carroll, Peter R Cooperberg, Matthew R |
author_sort | Jeong, Chang Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7583149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75831492020-10-29 The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer Jeong, Chang Wook Herlemann, Annika Cowan, Janet E Broering, Jeanette M ten Ham, Renske M T Wilson, Leslie S Carroll, Peter R Cooperberg, Matthew R JNCI Cancer Spectr Brief Communication Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility. Oxford University Press 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7583149/ /pubmed/33134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Jeong, Chang Wook Herlemann, Annika Cowan, Janet E Broering, Jeanette M ten Ham, Renske M T Wilson, Leslie S Carroll, Peter R Cooperberg, Matthew R The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title | The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title_full | The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title_short | The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | relative impact of urinary and sexual function vs bother on health utility for men with prostate cancer |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongchangwook therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT herlemannannika therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT cowanjanete therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT broeringjeanettem therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT tenhamrenskemt therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT wilsonleslies therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT carrollpeterr therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT cooperbergmatthewr therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT jeongchangwook relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT herlemannannika relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT cowanjanete relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT broeringjeanettem relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT tenhamrenskemt relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT wilsonleslies relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT carrollpeterr relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer AT cooperbergmatthewr relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer |