Cargando…

The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer

Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Chang Wook, Herlemann, Annika, Cowan, Janet E, Broering, Jeanette M, ten Ham, Renske M T, Wilson, Leslie S, Carroll, Peter R, Cooperberg, Matthew R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044
_version_ 1783599342444085248
author Jeong, Chang Wook
Herlemann, Annika
Cowan, Janet E
Broering, Jeanette M
ten Ham, Renske M T
Wilson, Leslie S
Carroll, Peter R
Cooperberg, Matthew R
author_facet Jeong, Chang Wook
Herlemann, Annika
Cowan, Janet E
Broering, Jeanette M
ten Ham, Renske M T
Wilson, Leslie S
Carroll, Peter R
Cooperberg, Matthew R
author_sort Jeong, Chang Wook
collection PubMed
description Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7583149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75831492020-10-29 The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer Jeong, Chang Wook Herlemann, Annika Cowan, Janet E Broering, Jeanette M ten Ham, Renske M T Wilson, Leslie S Carroll, Peter R Cooperberg, Matthew R JNCI Cancer Spectr Brief Communication Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility. Oxford University Press 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7583149/ /pubmed/33134826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Jeong, Chang Wook
Herlemann, Annika
Cowan, Janet E
Broering, Jeanette M
ten Ham, Renske M T
Wilson, Leslie S
Carroll, Peter R
Cooperberg, Matthew R
The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title_full The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title_short The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
title_sort relative impact of urinary and sexual function vs bother on health utility for men with prostate cancer
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa044
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongchangwook therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT herlemannannika therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT cowanjanete therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT broeringjeanettem therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT tenhamrenskemt therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT wilsonleslies therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT carrollpeterr therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT cooperbergmatthewr therelativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT jeongchangwook relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT herlemannannika relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT cowanjanete relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT broeringjeanettem relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT tenhamrenskemt relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT wilsonleslies relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT carrollpeterr relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer
AT cooperbergmatthewr relativeimpactofurinaryandsexualfunctionvsbotheronhealthutilityformenwithprostatecancer