Cargando…

Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects

BACKGROUND: There is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcotte, Erin L, Schraw, Jeremy M, Desrosiers, Tania A, Nembhard, Wendy N, Langlois, Peter H, Canfield, Mark A, Meyer, Robert E, Plon, Sharon E, Lupo, Philip J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa052
_version_ 1783599344099786752
author Marcotte, Erin L
Schraw, Jeremy M
Desrosiers, Tania A
Nembhard, Wendy N
Langlois, Peter H
Canfield, Mark A
Meyer, Robert E
Plon, Sharon E
Lupo, Philip J
author_facet Marcotte, Erin L
Schraw, Jeremy M
Desrosiers, Tania A
Nembhard, Wendy N
Langlois, Peter H
Canfield, Mark A
Meyer, Robert E
Plon, Sharon E
Lupo, Philip J
author_sort Marcotte, Erin L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation analysis to estimate whether the increased risk of cancer among males is partially explained by birth defect status. METHODS: We used a population-based birth cohort with linked data from birth certificates, birth defects registries, and cancer registries from Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. We conducted counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of sex on cancer risk, modeling birth defect status as mediator. State; birth year; plurality; and maternal race and ethnicity, age, and education were considered confounders. We conducted separate analyses limited to cancers diagnosed younger than 1 year of age. RESULTS: Our dataset included 10 181 074 children: 15 110 diagnosed with cancer, 539 567 diagnosed with birth defects, and 2124 co-occurring cases. Birth defect status mediated 38% of the association between sex and cancer overall. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type, including acute myeloid leukemia (93%), neuroblastoma (35%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). Among children younger than 1 year of age at cancer diagnosis, the proportion mediated was substantially higher (82%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that birth defects mediate a statistically significant proportion of the relationship between sex and childhood cancer. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type and diagnosis age. These findings improve our understanding of the causal pathway underlying male sex as a risk factor for childhood cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7583156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75831562020-10-29 Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects Marcotte, Erin L Schraw, Jeremy M Desrosiers, Tania A Nembhard, Wendy N Langlois, Peter H Canfield, Mark A Meyer, Robert E Plon, Sharon E Lupo, Philip J JNCI Cancer Spectr Article BACKGROUND: There is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation analysis to estimate whether the increased risk of cancer among males is partially explained by birth defect status. METHODS: We used a population-based birth cohort with linked data from birth certificates, birth defects registries, and cancer registries from Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. We conducted counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of sex on cancer risk, modeling birth defect status as mediator. State; birth year; plurality; and maternal race and ethnicity, age, and education were considered confounders. We conducted separate analyses limited to cancers diagnosed younger than 1 year of age. RESULTS: Our dataset included 10 181 074 children: 15 110 diagnosed with cancer, 539 567 diagnosed with birth defects, and 2124 co-occurring cases. Birth defect status mediated 38% of the association between sex and cancer overall. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type, including acute myeloid leukemia (93%), neuroblastoma (35%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). Among children younger than 1 year of age at cancer diagnosis, the proportion mediated was substantially higher (82%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that birth defects mediate a statistically significant proportion of the relationship between sex and childhood cancer. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type and diagnosis age. These findings improve our understanding of the causal pathway underlying male sex as a risk factor for childhood cancer. Oxford University Press 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7583156/ /pubmed/33134832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa052 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Marcotte, Erin L
Schraw, Jeremy M
Desrosiers, Tania A
Nembhard, Wendy N
Langlois, Peter H
Canfield, Mark A
Meyer, Robert E
Plon, Sharon E
Lupo, Philip J
Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title_full Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title_fullStr Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title_full_unstemmed Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title_short Male Sex and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: The Mediating Effect of Birth Defects
title_sort male sex and the risk of childhood cancer: the mediating effect of birth defects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa052
work_keys_str_mv AT marcotteerinl malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT schrawjeremym malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT desrosierstaniaa malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT nembhardwendyn malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT langloispeterh malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT canfieldmarka malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT meyerroberte malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT plonsharone malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects
AT lupophilipj malesexandtheriskofchildhoodcancerthemediatingeffectofbirthdefects