Cargando…
Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: For improved outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correct implant fitting and positioning are crucial. In order to facilitate a best possible implant fitting and positioning patient-specific systems have been developed. However, whether or not these systems allow for better implant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03707-2 |
_version_ | 1783599349722251264 |
---|---|
author | Arnholdt, Jörg Kamawal, Yama Horas, Konstantin Holzapfel, Boris M. Gilbert, Fabian Ripp, Axel Rudert, Maximilian Steinert, Andre F. |
author_facet | Arnholdt, Jörg Kamawal, Yama Horas, Konstantin Holzapfel, Boris M. Gilbert, Fabian Ripp, Axel Rudert, Maximilian Steinert, Andre F. |
author_sort | Arnholdt, Jörg |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For improved outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correct implant fitting and positioning are crucial. In order to facilitate a best possible implant fitting and positioning patient-specific systems have been developed. However, whether or not these systems allow for better implant fitting and positioning has yet to be elucidated. For this reason, the aim was to analyse the novel patient-specific cruciate retaining knee replacement system iTotal™ CR G2 that utilizes custom-made implants and instruments for its ability to facilitate accurate implant fitting and positioning including correction of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). METHODS: We assessed radiographic results of 106 patients who were treated with the second generation of a patient-specific cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty using iTotal™ CR G2 (ConforMIS Inc.) for tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) using custom-made implants and instruments. The implant fit and positioning as well as the correction of the mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) and restoration of the joint line were determined using pre- and postoperative radiographic analyses. RESULTS: On average, HKA was corrected from 174.4° ± 4.6° preoperatively to 178.8° ± 2.2° postoperatively and the coronal femoro-tibial angle was adjusted on average 4.4°. The measured preoperative tibial slope was 5.3° ± 2.2° (mean +/− SD) and the average postoperative tibial slope was 4.7° ± 1.1° on lateral views. The joint line was well preserved with an average modified Insall-Salvati index of 1.66 ± 0.16 pre- and 1.67 ± 0.16 postoperatively. The overall accuracy of fit of implant components was decent with a measured medial overhang of more than 1 mm (1.33 mm ± 0.32 mm) in 4 cases only. Further, a lateral overhang of more than 1 mm (1.8 mm ± 0.63) (measured in the anterior-posterior radiographs) was observed in 11 cases, with none of the 106 patients showing femoral notching. CONCLUSION: The patient-specific iTotal™ CR G2 total knee replacement system facilitated a proper fitting and positioning of the implant components. Moreover, a good restoration of the leg axis towards neutral alignment was achieved as planned. Nonetheless, further clinical follow-up studies are necessary to validate our findings and to determine the long-term impact of using this patient- specific system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7583183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75831832020-10-26 Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty Arnholdt, Jörg Kamawal, Yama Horas, Konstantin Holzapfel, Boris M. Gilbert, Fabian Ripp, Axel Rudert, Maximilian Steinert, Andre F. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: For improved outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correct implant fitting and positioning are crucial. In order to facilitate a best possible implant fitting and positioning patient-specific systems have been developed. However, whether or not these systems allow for better implant fitting and positioning has yet to be elucidated. For this reason, the aim was to analyse the novel patient-specific cruciate retaining knee replacement system iTotal™ CR G2 that utilizes custom-made implants and instruments for its ability to facilitate accurate implant fitting and positioning including correction of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). METHODS: We assessed radiographic results of 106 patients who were treated with the second generation of a patient-specific cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty using iTotal™ CR G2 (ConforMIS Inc.) for tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) using custom-made implants and instruments. The implant fit and positioning as well as the correction of the mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) and restoration of the joint line were determined using pre- and postoperative radiographic analyses. RESULTS: On average, HKA was corrected from 174.4° ± 4.6° preoperatively to 178.8° ± 2.2° postoperatively and the coronal femoro-tibial angle was adjusted on average 4.4°. The measured preoperative tibial slope was 5.3° ± 2.2° (mean +/− SD) and the average postoperative tibial slope was 4.7° ± 1.1° on lateral views. The joint line was well preserved with an average modified Insall-Salvati index of 1.66 ± 0.16 pre- and 1.67 ± 0.16 postoperatively. The overall accuracy of fit of implant components was decent with a measured medial overhang of more than 1 mm (1.33 mm ± 0.32 mm) in 4 cases only. Further, a lateral overhang of more than 1 mm (1.8 mm ± 0.63) (measured in the anterior-posterior radiographs) was observed in 11 cases, with none of the 106 patients showing femoral notching. CONCLUSION: The patient-specific iTotal™ CR G2 total knee replacement system facilitated a proper fitting and positioning of the implant components. Moreover, a good restoration of the leg axis towards neutral alignment was achieved as planned. Nonetheless, further clinical follow-up studies are necessary to validate our findings and to determine the long-term impact of using this patient- specific system. BioMed Central 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7583183/ /pubmed/33092567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03707-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Arnholdt, Jörg Kamawal, Yama Horas, Konstantin Holzapfel, Boris M. Gilbert, Fabian Ripp, Axel Rudert, Maximilian Steinert, Andre F. Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title | Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title_full | Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title_short | Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
title_sort | accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03707-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arnholdtjorg accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT kamawalyama accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT horaskonstantin accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT holzapfelborism accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT gilbertfabian accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT rippaxel accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT rudertmaximilian accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty AT steinertandref accurateimplantfitandlegalignmentaftercruciateretainingpatientspecifictotalkneearthroplasty |