Cargando…
Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations for practice, but the proliferation of CPGs issued by multiple organisations in recent years has raised concern about their quality. The aim of this study was to systematically appraise CPGs quality for low back pain (LBP) inter...
Autores principales: | Castellini, G., Iannicelli, V., Briguglio, M., Corbetta, D., Sconfienza, L. M., Banfi, G., Gianola, S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05827-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted?
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials for low back pain: proof of statistical significance often is not relevant
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Guidelines for uveal melanoma: a critical appraisal of systematically identified guidelines using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instrument
por: Steeb, Theresa, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Quality of Practice Guidelines for Melanoma: A Methodologic Appraisal with the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments
por: Steeb, Theresa, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluation of the Quality of Guidelines for Myasthenia Gravis with the AGREE II Instrument
por: Zhang, Zhenchang, et al.
Publicado: (2014)