Cargando…
A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts
The paper outlines one of the most important challenges that embodied and grounded theories need to face, i.e., that to explain how abstract concepts (abstractness) are acquired, represented, and used. I illustrate the view according to which abstract concepts are grounded not only in sensorimotor e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134816 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.134 |
_version_ | 1783599357211181056 |
---|---|
author | Borghi, Anna M. |
author_facet | Borghi, Anna M. |
author_sort | Borghi, Anna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The paper outlines one of the most important challenges that embodied and grounded theories need to face, i.e., that to explain how abstract concepts (abstractness) are acquired, represented, and used. I illustrate the view according to which abstract concepts are grounded not only in sensorimotor experiences, like concrete concepts, but also and to a greater extent in linguistic, social, and inner experiences. Specifically, I discuss the role played by metacognition, inner speech, social metacognition, and interoception. I also present evidence showing that the weight of linguistic, social, and inner experiences varies depending on the considered sub-kind of abstract concepts (e.g., mental states and spiritual concepts, numbers, emotions, social concepts). I argue that the challenge to explain abstract concepts representation implies the recognition of: a. the role of language, intended as inner and social tool, in shaping our mind; b. the importance of differences across languages; c. the existence of different kinds of abstract concepts; d. the necessity to adopt new paradigms, able to capture the use of abstract concepts in context and interactive situations. This challenge should be addressed with an integrated approach that bridges developmental, anthropological, and neuroscientific studies. This approach extends embodied and grounded views incorporating insights from distributional statistics views of meaning, from pragmatics and semiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7583217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75832172020-10-30 A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts Borghi, Anna M. J Cogn Review Article The paper outlines one of the most important challenges that embodied and grounded theories need to face, i.e., that to explain how abstract concepts (abstractness) are acquired, represented, and used. I illustrate the view according to which abstract concepts are grounded not only in sensorimotor experiences, like concrete concepts, but also and to a greater extent in linguistic, social, and inner experiences. Specifically, I discuss the role played by metacognition, inner speech, social metacognition, and interoception. I also present evidence showing that the weight of linguistic, social, and inner experiences varies depending on the considered sub-kind of abstract concepts (e.g., mental states and spiritual concepts, numbers, emotions, social concepts). I argue that the challenge to explain abstract concepts representation implies the recognition of: a. the role of language, intended as inner and social tool, in shaping our mind; b. the importance of differences across languages; c. the existence of different kinds of abstract concepts; d. the necessity to adopt new paradigms, able to capture the use of abstract concepts in context and interactive situations. This challenge should be addressed with an integrated approach that bridges developmental, anthropological, and neuroscientific studies. This approach extends embodied and grounded views incorporating insights from distributional statistics views of meaning, from pragmatics and semiotics. Ubiquity Press 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7583217/ /pubmed/33134816 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.134 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Borghi, Anna M. A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title | A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title_full | A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title_fullStr | A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title_full_unstemmed | A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title_short | A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts |
title_sort | future of words: language and the challenge of abstract concepts |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134816 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borghiannam afutureofwordslanguageandthechallengeofabstractconcepts AT borghiannam futureofwordslanguageandthechallengeofabstractconcepts |