Cargando…

Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis

Patient outcome in trans‐aortic valve implantation (TAVI) therapy partly relies on a patient's haemodynamic properties that cannot be determined from current diagnostic methods alone. In this study, we predict changes in haemodynamic parameters (as a part of patient outcome) after valve replace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meiburg, Roel, Huberts, Wouter, Rutten, Marcel C. M., van de Vosse, Frans N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32691507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3388
_version_ 1783599386368933888
author Meiburg, Roel
Huberts, Wouter
Rutten, Marcel C. M.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
author_facet Meiburg, Roel
Huberts, Wouter
Rutten, Marcel C. M.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
author_sort Meiburg, Roel
collection PubMed
description Patient outcome in trans‐aortic valve implantation (TAVI) therapy partly relies on a patient's haemodynamic properties that cannot be determined from current diagnostic methods alone. In this study, we predict changes in haemodynamic parameters (as a part of patient outcome) after valve replacement treatment in aortic stenosis patients. A framework to incorporate uncertainty in patient‐specific model predictions for decision support is presented. A 0D lumped parameter model including the left ventricle, a stenotic valve and systemic circulatory system has been developed, based on models published earlier. The unscented Kalman filter (UKF) is used to optimize model input parameters to fit measured data pre‐intervention. After optimization, the valve treatment is simulated by significantly reducing valve resistance. Uncertain model parameters are then propagated using a polynomial chaos expansion approach. To test the proposed framework, three in silico test cases are developed with clinically feasible measurements. Quality and availability of simulated measured patient data are decreased in each case. The UKF approach is compared to a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach, a well‐known approach in modelling predictions with uncertainty. Both methods show increased confidence intervals as measurement quality decreases. By considering three in silico test‐cases we were able to show that the proposed framework is able to incorporate optimization uncertainty in model predictions and is faster and the MCMC approach, although it is more sensitive to noise in flow measurements. To conclude, this work shows that the proposed framework is ready to be applied to real patient data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7583387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75833872020-10-29 Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis Meiburg, Roel Huberts, Wouter Rutten, Marcel C. M. van de Vosse, Frans N. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Research Article ‐ Applications Patient outcome in trans‐aortic valve implantation (TAVI) therapy partly relies on a patient's haemodynamic properties that cannot be determined from current diagnostic methods alone. In this study, we predict changes in haemodynamic parameters (as a part of patient outcome) after valve replacement treatment in aortic stenosis patients. A framework to incorporate uncertainty in patient‐specific model predictions for decision support is presented. A 0D lumped parameter model including the left ventricle, a stenotic valve and systemic circulatory system has been developed, based on models published earlier. The unscented Kalman filter (UKF) is used to optimize model input parameters to fit measured data pre‐intervention. After optimization, the valve treatment is simulated by significantly reducing valve resistance. Uncertain model parameters are then propagated using a polynomial chaos expansion approach. To test the proposed framework, three in silico test cases are developed with clinically feasible measurements. Quality and availability of simulated measured patient data are decreased in each case. The UKF approach is compared to a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach, a well‐known approach in modelling predictions with uncertainty. Both methods show increased confidence intervals as measurement quality decreases. By considering three in silico test‐cases we were able to show that the proposed framework is able to incorporate optimization uncertainty in model predictions and is faster and the MCMC approach, although it is more sensitive to noise in flow measurements. To conclude, this work shows that the proposed framework is ready to be applied to real patient data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-08-05 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7583387/ /pubmed/32691507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3388 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article ‐ Applications
Meiburg, Roel
Huberts, Wouter
Rutten, Marcel C. M.
van de Vosse, Frans N.
Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title_full Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title_fullStr Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title_short Uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis
title_sort uncertainty in model‐based treatment decision support: applied to aortic valve stenosis
topic Research Article ‐ Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32691507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3388
work_keys_str_mv AT meiburgroel uncertaintyinmodelbasedtreatmentdecisionsupportappliedtoaorticvalvestenosis
AT hubertswouter uncertaintyinmodelbasedtreatmentdecisionsupportappliedtoaorticvalvestenosis
AT ruttenmarcelcm uncertaintyinmodelbasedtreatmentdecisionsupportappliedtoaorticvalvestenosis
AT vandevossefransn uncertaintyinmodelbasedtreatmentdecisionsupportappliedtoaorticvalvestenosis