Cargando…

Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, and cetuximab, a human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody, have shown clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the phase 3 noninferiority ASPECCT (ClinicalTrial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Timothy, Ang, Agnes, Boedigheimer, Michael, Kim, Tae Won, Li, Jin, Cascinu, Stefano, Ruff, Paul, Satya Suresh, Attili, Thomas, Anne, Tjulandin, Sergei, Peeters, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, and cetuximab, a human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody, have shown clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the phase 3 noninferiority ASPECCT (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01001377) study, panitumumab was demonstrated to be noninferior to cetuximab and provided a similar overall survival benefit for patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC. However, some patients eventually develop resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. EGFR p.S492R mutation was previously identified as conferring resistance to cetuximab, but not to panitumumab. METHODS: This biomarker study analyzed plasma samples from ASPECCT collected at both baseline and posttreatment. RESULTS: No EGFR p.S492R mutations were identified at baseline; however, after treatment the EGFR p.S492R mutation was detected in 1% of patients treated with panitumumab versus 16% of those treated with cetuximab, supporting that, in a large population, this mutation is more likely to be induced by cetuximab than by panitumumab. There were, however, no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival between patients who were wild-type compared with those with the S492R mutation within the cetuximab arm or the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: These results may support targeting treatment to small patient subgroups based on the presence of emerging EGFR mutations and provide a molecular rationale for rechallenging with a different anti-EGFR agent in patients who develop resistance. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab in the EGFR p.S492R mutant population.