Cargando…

Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades

Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruckman, Sarah N., Jonika, Michelle M., Casola, Claudio, Blackmon, Heath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076
_version_ 1783599550881071104
author Ruckman, Sarah N.
Jonika, Michelle M.
Casola, Claudio
Blackmon, Heath
author_facet Ruckman, Sarah N.
Jonika, Michelle M.
Casola, Claudio
Blackmon, Heath
author_sort Ruckman, Sarah N.
collection PubMed
description Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may fail in species with monocentric chromosomes after a fusion or fission, which may lead to chromosomes with no centromere or multiple centromeres. In contrast, species with holocentric chromosomes should still be able to safely segregate chromosomes after fusion or fission. This along with the observation of high chromosome number in some holocentric clades has led to the hypothesis that holocentricity leads to higher rates of chromosome number evolution. To test for differences in rates of chromosome number evolution between these systems, we analyzed data from 4,393 species of insects in a phylogenetic framework. We found that insect orders exhibit striking differences in rates of fissions, fusions, and polyploidy. However, across all insects we found no evidence that holocentric clades have higher rates of fissions, fusions, or polyploidy than monocentric clades. Our results suggest that holocentricity alone does not lead to higher rates of chromosome number changes. Instead, we suggest that other co-evolving traits must explain striking differences between clades.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75842132020-10-28 Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades Ruckman, Sarah N. Jonika, Michelle M. Casola, Claudio Blackmon, Heath PLoS Genet Research Article Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may fail in species with monocentric chromosomes after a fusion or fission, which may lead to chromosomes with no centromere or multiple centromeres. In contrast, species with holocentric chromosomes should still be able to safely segregate chromosomes after fusion or fission. This along with the observation of high chromosome number in some holocentric clades has led to the hypothesis that holocentricity leads to higher rates of chromosome number evolution. To test for differences in rates of chromosome number evolution between these systems, we analyzed data from 4,393 species of insects in a phylogenetic framework. We found that insect orders exhibit striking differences in rates of fissions, fusions, and polyploidy. However, across all insects we found no evidence that holocentric clades have higher rates of fissions, fusions, or polyploidy than monocentric clades. Our results suggest that holocentricity alone does not lead to higher rates of chromosome number changes. Instead, we suggest that other co-evolving traits must explain striking differences between clades. Public Library of Science 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7584213/ /pubmed/33048946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076 Text en © 2020 Ruckman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruckman, Sarah N.
Jonika, Michelle M.
Casola, Claudio
Blackmon, Heath
Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title_full Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title_fullStr Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title_full_unstemmed Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title_short Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
title_sort chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076
work_keys_str_mv AT ruckmansarahn chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades
AT jonikamichellem chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades
AT casolaclaudio chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades
AT blackmonheath chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades