Cargando…
Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades
Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076 |
_version_ | 1783599550881071104 |
---|---|
author | Ruckman, Sarah N. Jonika, Michelle M. Casola, Claudio Blackmon, Heath |
author_facet | Ruckman, Sarah N. Jonika, Michelle M. Casola, Claudio Blackmon, Heath |
author_sort | Ruckman, Sarah N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may fail in species with monocentric chromosomes after a fusion or fission, which may lead to chromosomes with no centromere or multiple centromeres. In contrast, species with holocentric chromosomes should still be able to safely segregate chromosomes after fusion or fission. This along with the observation of high chromosome number in some holocentric clades has led to the hypothesis that holocentricity leads to higher rates of chromosome number evolution. To test for differences in rates of chromosome number evolution between these systems, we analyzed data from 4,393 species of insects in a phylogenetic framework. We found that insect orders exhibit striking differences in rates of fissions, fusions, and polyploidy. However, across all insects we found no evidence that holocentric clades have higher rates of fissions, fusions, or polyploidy than monocentric clades. Our results suggest that holocentricity alone does not lead to higher rates of chromosome number changes. Instead, we suggest that other co-evolving traits must explain striking differences between clades. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7584213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75842132020-10-28 Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades Ruckman, Sarah N. Jonika, Michelle M. Casola, Claudio Blackmon, Heath PLoS Genet Research Article Despite the fundamental role of centromeres two different types are observed across plants and animals. Monocentric chromosomes possess a single region that function as the centromere while in holocentric chromosomes centromere activity is spread across the entire chromosome. Proper segregation may fail in species with monocentric chromosomes after a fusion or fission, which may lead to chromosomes with no centromere or multiple centromeres. In contrast, species with holocentric chromosomes should still be able to safely segregate chromosomes after fusion or fission. This along with the observation of high chromosome number in some holocentric clades has led to the hypothesis that holocentricity leads to higher rates of chromosome number evolution. To test for differences in rates of chromosome number evolution between these systems, we analyzed data from 4,393 species of insects in a phylogenetic framework. We found that insect orders exhibit striking differences in rates of fissions, fusions, and polyploidy. However, across all insects we found no evidence that holocentric clades have higher rates of fissions, fusions, or polyploidy than monocentric clades. Our results suggest that holocentricity alone does not lead to higher rates of chromosome number changes. Instead, we suggest that other co-evolving traits must explain striking differences between clades. Public Library of Science 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7584213/ /pubmed/33048946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076 Text en © 2020 Ruckman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ruckman, Sarah N. Jonika, Michelle M. Casola, Claudio Blackmon, Heath Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title | Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title_full | Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title_fullStr | Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title_full_unstemmed | Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title_short | Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
title_sort | chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruckmansarahn chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades AT jonikamichellem chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades AT casolaclaudio chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades AT blackmonheath chromosomenumberevolvesatequalratesinholocentricandmonocentricclades |