Cargando…
Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385 |
_version_ | 1783599551104417792 |
---|---|
author | Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro Burillo, Pablo Gallardo, Leonor Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel Felipe, Jose Luis |
author_facet | Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro Burillo, Pablo Gallardo, Leonor Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel Felipe, Jose Luis |
author_sort | Garcia-Unanue, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Canada 2015 (artificial turf) and 283 players from 16 national teams who played in Germany 2011 (natural grass) were selected for this study. The collected data were provided by OPTA Sports. Twenty-nine key performance indicators were included for analysis. The variables were calculated for the total sample and independently by positions (defense, midfielders and forwards) for matches on natural grass (2011) and artificial turf (2015). A Mann–Whitney U test was used out to identify differences between the sport surfaces. Moreover, a discriminant analysis was performed with the forced entry method to find the variables that better differentiated between the FIFA Women's World Cup 2011 (natural grass) and FIFA Women's World Cup 2015 (artificial turf). Key performance aspects were very similar between the two tournaments, but on natural grass, we observed a significantly higher number of total passes, successful dribbles, total tackles, successful tackles and interceptions. However, on artificial turf there were significantly higher percentages of success in total passes, and a higher number of fouls. This is an important factor for the choice of an elite competition surface because technical actions are crucial to the quality of the game and can influence the future behavior of spectators and fans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7584214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75842142020-10-28 Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro Burillo, Pablo Gallardo, Leonor Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel Felipe, Jose Luis PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Canada 2015 (artificial turf) and 283 players from 16 national teams who played in Germany 2011 (natural grass) were selected for this study. The collected data were provided by OPTA Sports. Twenty-nine key performance indicators were included for analysis. The variables were calculated for the total sample and independently by positions (defense, midfielders and forwards) for matches on natural grass (2011) and artificial turf (2015). A Mann–Whitney U test was used out to identify differences between the sport surfaces. Moreover, a discriminant analysis was performed with the forced entry method to find the variables that better differentiated between the FIFA Women's World Cup 2011 (natural grass) and FIFA Women's World Cup 2015 (artificial turf). Key performance aspects were very similar between the two tournaments, but on natural grass, we observed a significantly higher number of total passes, successful dribbles, total tackles, successful tackles and interceptions. However, on artificial turf there were significantly higher percentages of success in total passes, and a higher number of fouls. This is an important factor for the choice of an elite competition surface because technical actions are crucial to the quality of the game and can influence the future behavior of spectators and fans. Public Library of Science 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7584214/ /pubmed/33095837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385 Text en © 2020 Garcia-Unanue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro Burillo, Pablo Gallardo, Leonor Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel Felipe, Jose Luis Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title | Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title_full | Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title_fullStr | Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title_short | Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces |
title_sort | key performance indicators at fifa women's world cup in different playing surfaces |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciaunanuejorge keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT fernandezlunaalvaro keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT burillopablo keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT gallardoleonor keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT sanchezsanchezjavier keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT manzanocarrascosamuel keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces AT felipejoseluis keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces |