Cargando…

Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces

The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia-Unanue, Jorge, Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro, Burillo, Pablo, Gallardo, Leonor, Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier, Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel, Felipe, Jose Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385
_version_ 1783599551104417792
author Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro
Burillo, Pablo
Gallardo, Leonor
Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier
Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel
Felipe, Jose Luis
author_facet Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro
Burillo, Pablo
Gallardo, Leonor
Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier
Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel
Felipe, Jose Luis
author_sort Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Canada 2015 (artificial turf) and 283 players from 16 national teams who played in Germany 2011 (natural grass) were selected for this study. The collected data were provided by OPTA Sports. Twenty-nine key performance indicators were included for analysis. The variables were calculated for the total sample and independently by positions (defense, midfielders and forwards) for matches on natural grass (2011) and artificial turf (2015). A Mann–Whitney U test was used out to identify differences between the sport surfaces. Moreover, a discriminant analysis was performed with the forced entry method to find the variables that better differentiated between the FIFA Women's World Cup 2011 (natural grass) and FIFA Women's World Cup 2015 (artificial turf). Key performance aspects were very similar between the two tournaments, but on natural grass, we observed a significantly higher number of total passes, successful dribbles, total tackles, successful tackles and interceptions. However, on artificial turf there were significantly higher percentages of success in total passes, and a higher number of fouls. This is an important factor for the choice of an elite competition surface because technical actions are crucial to the quality of the game and can influence the future behavior of spectators and fans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75842142020-10-28 Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro Burillo, Pablo Gallardo, Leonor Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel Felipe, Jose Luis PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to examine the key performance indicators of female professional soccer players during the 2011 and 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup, played on different surfaces (natural and artificial turf respectively). A total of 438 women from 24 national teams who participated at Canada 2015 (artificial turf) and 283 players from 16 national teams who played in Germany 2011 (natural grass) were selected for this study. The collected data were provided by OPTA Sports. Twenty-nine key performance indicators were included for analysis. The variables were calculated for the total sample and independently by positions (defense, midfielders and forwards) for matches on natural grass (2011) and artificial turf (2015). A Mann–Whitney U test was used out to identify differences between the sport surfaces. Moreover, a discriminant analysis was performed with the forced entry method to find the variables that better differentiated between the FIFA Women's World Cup 2011 (natural grass) and FIFA Women's World Cup 2015 (artificial turf). Key performance aspects were very similar between the two tournaments, but on natural grass, we observed a significantly higher number of total passes, successful dribbles, total tackles, successful tackles and interceptions. However, on artificial turf there were significantly higher percentages of success in total passes, and a higher number of fouls. This is an important factor for the choice of an elite competition surface because technical actions are crucial to the quality of the game and can influence the future behavior of spectators and fans. Public Library of Science 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7584214/ /pubmed/33095837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385 Text en © 2020 Garcia-Unanue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Fernandez-Luna, Alvaro
Burillo, Pablo
Gallardo, Leonor
Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier
Manzano-Carrasco, Samuel
Felipe, Jose Luis
Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title_full Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title_fullStr Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title_short Key performance indicators at FIFA Women's World Cup in different playing surfaces
title_sort key performance indicators at fifa women's world cup in different playing surfaces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241385
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaunanuejorge keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT fernandezlunaalvaro keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT burillopablo keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT gallardoleonor keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT sanchezsanchezjavier keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT manzanocarrascosamuel keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces
AT felipejoseluis keyperformanceindicatorsatfifawomensworldcupindifferentplayingsurfaces