Cargando…

Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic

BACKGROUND: In the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, mainly data related to the burden of care required by infected patients were reported. The aim of this study was to illustrate the timeline of actions taken and to measure and analyze their impact on surgical patients. METHOD: This is a retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübner, Martin, Zingg, Tobias, Martin, David, Eckert, Philippe, Demartines, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241331
_version_ 1783599559089324032
author Hübner, Martin
Zingg, Tobias
Martin, David
Eckert, Philippe
Demartines, Nicolas
author_facet Hübner, Martin
Zingg, Tobias
Martin, David
Eckert, Philippe
Demartines, Nicolas
author_sort Hübner, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, mainly data related to the burden of care required by infected patients were reported. The aim of this study was to illustrate the timeline of actions taken and to measure and analyze their impact on surgical patients. METHOD: This is a retrospective review of actions to limit Covid-19 spread and their impact on surgical activity in a Swiss tertiary referral center. Data on patient care, human resources and hospital logistics were collected. Impact on surgical activity was measured by comparing 6-week periods before and after the first measures were taken. RESULTS: After the first Swiss Covid-19 case appeared on February 25, progressively restrictive measures were taken over a period of 23 days. Covid-19 positive inpatients increased from 5 to 131, and ICU patients from 2 to 31, between days 10 and 30, respectively, without ever overloading resources. A 43% decrease of elective visceral surgical procedures was observed after Covid-19 (295 vs 165, p<0.01), while the urgent operations (all specialties) decreased by 39% (1476 vs 897, p<0.01). Fifty-two and 38 major oncological surgeries were performed, respectively, representing a 27% decrease (p = 0.316). Outpatient consultations dropped by 59%, from 728 to 296 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: While allowing for maximal care of Covid-19 patients during the pandemic, the shift of resources limited the access to elective surgical care, with less impact on cancer care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75842482020-10-28 Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic Hübner, Martin Zingg, Tobias Martin, David Eckert, Philippe Demartines, Nicolas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, mainly data related to the burden of care required by infected patients were reported. The aim of this study was to illustrate the timeline of actions taken and to measure and analyze their impact on surgical patients. METHOD: This is a retrospective review of actions to limit Covid-19 spread and their impact on surgical activity in a Swiss tertiary referral center. Data on patient care, human resources and hospital logistics were collected. Impact on surgical activity was measured by comparing 6-week periods before and after the first measures were taken. RESULTS: After the first Swiss Covid-19 case appeared on February 25, progressively restrictive measures were taken over a period of 23 days. Covid-19 positive inpatients increased from 5 to 131, and ICU patients from 2 to 31, between days 10 and 30, respectively, without ever overloading resources. A 43% decrease of elective visceral surgical procedures was observed after Covid-19 (295 vs 165, p<0.01), while the urgent operations (all specialties) decreased by 39% (1476 vs 897, p<0.01). Fifty-two and 38 major oncological surgeries were performed, respectively, representing a 27% decrease (p = 0.316). Outpatient consultations dropped by 59%, from 728 to 296 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: While allowing for maximal care of Covid-19 patients during the pandemic, the shift of resources limited the access to elective surgical care, with less impact on cancer care. Public Library of Science 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7584248/ /pubmed/33095834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241331 Text en © 2020 Hübner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hübner, Martin
Zingg, Tobias
Martin, David
Eckert, Philippe
Demartines, Nicolas
Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title_full Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title_fullStr Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title_short Surgery for non-Covid-19 patients during the pandemic
title_sort surgery for non-covid-19 patients during the pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33095834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241331
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnermartin surgeryfornoncovid19patientsduringthepandemic
AT zinggtobias surgeryfornoncovid19patientsduringthepandemic
AT martindavid surgeryfornoncovid19patientsduringthepandemic
AT eckertphilippe surgeryfornoncovid19patientsduringthepandemic
AT demartinesnicolas surgeryfornoncovid19patientsduringthepandemic