Cargando…

Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE: Whipple’s procedure for periampullary tumors has significant risks and complications. Delayed gastric emptying has the highest rate. Although the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery defined (ISGPS) this entity, multiple definitions still exist among authors. This study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cakir, Mikail, Akinci, Muzaffer, Akturk, Okan Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul Medeniyet University 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110669
http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.02222
_version_ 1783599562577936384
author Cakir, Mikail
Akinci, Muzaffer
Akturk, Okan Murat
author_facet Cakir, Mikail
Akinci, Muzaffer
Akturk, Okan Murat
author_sort Cakir, Mikail
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Whipple’s procedure for periampullary tumors has significant risks and complications. Delayed gastric emptying has the highest rate. Although the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery defined (ISGPS) this entity, multiple definitions still exist among authors. This study aims to revise the definition. METHOD: Seventy-three consecutive patients were analyzed for complications, particularly delayed gastric emptying. All patients underwent a standardized surgery. Procedures used for total pancreatectomies and benign diseases were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Intra-abdominal complications were observed in 15 (20.6%) patients. Grade C delayed gastric emptying was observed in only one (1.4%) patient. Grade A and B disease were observed in three (4.1%) patients. However, they responded well to conservative methods, causing no extra morbidity. CONCLUSION: Grade A and B delayed gastric emptying can be observed after any gastrointestinal surgery. These patients respond well to simple conservative methods with nasogastric intubation. Drainage of the intra-abdominal collection resolves the emptying problem (if any). Only grade C disease without other intra-abdominal complications can be accepted as a complication of this procedure. ISGPS definition does not include the cause. Thus, the definition and grading can be revised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Istanbul Medeniyet University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75842642020-10-26 Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience Cakir, Mikail Akinci, Muzaffer Akturk, Okan Murat Medeni Med J Original Study OBJECTIVE: Whipple’s procedure for periampullary tumors has significant risks and complications. Delayed gastric emptying has the highest rate. Although the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery defined (ISGPS) this entity, multiple definitions still exist among authors. This study aims to revise the definition. METHOD: Seventy-three consecutive patients were analyzed for complications, particularly delayed gastric emptying. All patients underwent a standardized surgery. Procedures used for total pancreatectomies and benign diseases were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Intra-abdominal complications were observed in 15 (20.6%) patients. Grade C delayed gastric emptying was observed in only one (1.4%) patient. Grade A and B disease were observed in three (4.1%) patients. However, they responded well to conservative methods, causing no extra morbidity. CONCLUSION: Grade A and B delayed gastric emptying can be observed after any gastrointestinal surgery. These patients respond well to simple conservative methods with nasogastric intubation. Drainage of the intra-abdominal collection resolves the emptying problem (if any). Only grade C disease without other intra-abdominal complications can be accepted as a complication of this procedure. ISGPS definition does not include the cause. Thus, the definition and grading can be revised. Istanbul Medeniyet University 2020 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7584264/ /pubmed/33110669 http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.02222 Text en © Copyright Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This journal is published by Logos Medical Publishing. Licenced by Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
spellingShingle Original Study
Cakir, Mikail
Akinci, Muzaffer
Akturk, Okan Murat
Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title_full Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title_short Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Complication of Whipple’s Procedure: Could it be Much Less Frequent than Anticipated? Could the Definition Be Revised? A Single Center Experience
title_sort delayed gastric emptying as a complication of whipple’s procedure: could it be much less frequent than anticipated? could the definition be revised? a single center experience
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110669
http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.02222
work_keys_str_mv AT cakirmikail delayedgastricemptyingasacomplicationofwhipplesprocedurecoulditbemuchlessfrequentthananticipatedcouldthedefinitionberevisedasinglecenterexperience
AT akincimuzaffer delayedgastricemptyingasacomplicationofwhipplesprocedurecoulditbemuchlessfrequentthananticipatedcouldthedefinitionberevisedasinglecenterexperience
AT akturkokanmurat delayedgastricemptyingasacomplicationofwhipplesprocedurecoulditbemuchlessfrequentthananticipatedcouldthedefinitionberevisedasinglecenterexperience