Cargando…
Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure inju...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123442 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629 |
_version_ | 1783599570094129152 |
---|---|
author | Sieracki, James Wilkes, Robert Bennett, Eric R McNulty, Amy K |
author_facet | Sieracki, James Wilkes, Robert Bennett, Eric R McNulty, Amy K |
author_sort | Sieracki, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure injury prevention strategies. This study assesses the reduction in tissue strain and stresses associated with the use of a new silicone foam dressing. Methods Finite element analysis (FEA) models were used to investigate the ability of silicone foam dressings to reduce tissue stress and strain energy density (SED) in the regions adjacent to the sacral bone. The loading modeled on the dressings was for combined compression and shear (modeling a patient lying in a 45° Fowler's position). Nine commercially available silicone foam dressings and a no-dressing control were modeled. Results FEA modeling showed that all silicone dressings tested, including Tegaderm™ Silicone Foam (TSF; 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) dressings, achieved reductions in tissue distortional stress and SED relative to no-dressing conditions. The use of silicone foam dressing results in a lower volume of tissue at higher stresses and deformation compared to no dressing. Conclusion The results presented indicate that TSF may provide an appropriate option for pressure ulcer prevention programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7584301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75843012020-10-28 Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing Sieracki, James Wilkes, Robert Bennett, Eric R McNulty, Amy K Cureus Dermatology Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure injury prevention strategies. This study assesses the reduction in tissue strain and stresses associated with the use of a new silicone foam dressing. Methods Finite element analysis (FEA) models were used to investigate the ability of silicone foam dressings to reduce tissue stress and strain energy density (SED) in the regions adjacent to the sacral bone. The loading modeled on the dressings was for combined compression and shear (modeling a patient lying in a 45° Fowler's position). Nine commercially available silicone foam dressings and a no-dressing control were modeled. Results FEA modeling showed that all silicone dressings tested, including Tegaderm™ Silicone Foam (TSF; 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) dressings, achieved reductions in tissue distortional stress and SED relative to no-dressing conditions. The use of silicone foam dressing results in a lower volume of tissue at higher stresses and deformation compared to no dressing. Conclusion The results presented indicate that TSF may provide an appropriate option for pressure ulcer prevention programs. Cureus 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7584301/ /pubmed/33123442 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629 Text en Copyright © 2020, Sieracki et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Sieracki, James Wilkes, Robert Bennett, Eric R McNulty, Amy K Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title | Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title_full | Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title_fullStr | Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title_short | Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing |
title_sort | finite element analysis modeling of a novel silicone dressing |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123442 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sierackijames finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing AT wilkesrobert finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing AT bennettericr finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing AT mcnultyamyk finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing |