Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing

Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure inju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sieracki, James, Wilkes, Robert, Bennett, Eric R, McNulty, Amy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123442
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629
_version_ 1783599570094129152
author Sieracki, James
Wilkes, Robert
Bennett, Eric R
McNulty, Amy K
author_facet Sieracki, James
Wilkes, Robert
Bennett, Eric R
McNulty, Amy K
author_sort Sieracki, James
collection PubMed
description Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure injury prevention strategies. This study assesses the reduction in tissue strain and stresses associated with the use of a new silicone foam dressing.  Methods Finite element analysis (FEA) models were used to investigate the ability of silicone foam dressings to reduce tissue stress and strain energy density (SED) in the regions adjacent to the sacral bone. The loading modeled on the dressings was for combined compression and shear (modeling a patient lying in a 45° Fowler's position). Nine commercially available silicone foam dressings and a no-dressing control were modeled. Results FEA modeling showed that all silicone dressings tested, including Tegaderm™ Silicone Foam (TSF; 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) dressings, achieved reductions in tissue distortional stress and SED relative to no-dressing conditions. The use of silicone foam dressing results in a lower volume of tissue at higher stresses and deformation compared to no dressing. Conclusion The results presented indicate that TSF may provide an appropriate option for pressure ulcer prevention programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75843012020-10-28 Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing Sieracki, James Wilkes, Robert Bennett, Eric R McNulty, Amy K Cureus Dermatology Introduction In the United States (US), pressure injuries are believed to affect over 2.5 million people. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in the European Union (EU) is believed to be 13.7%. Recent guidelines have recommended the consideration of polyurethane foam dressings as part of pressure injury prevention strategies. This study assesses the reduction in tissue strain and stresses associated with the use of a new silicone foam dressing.  Methods Finite element analysis (FEA) models were used to investigate the ability of silicone foam dressings to reduce tissue stress and strain energy density (SED) in the regions adjacent to the sacral bone. The loading modeled on the dressings was for combined compression and shear (modeling a patient lying in a 45° Fowler's position). Nine commercially available silicone foam dressings and a no-dressing control were modeled. Results FEA modeling showed that all silicone dressings tested, including Tegaderm™ Silicone Foam (TSF; 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) dressings, achieved reductions in tissue distortional stress and SED relative to no-dressing conditions. The use of silicone foam dressing results in a lower volume of tissue at higher stresses and deformation compared to no dressing. Conclusion The results presented indicate that TSF may provide an appropriate option for pressure ulcer prevention programs. Cureus 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7584301/ /pubmed/33123442 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629 Text en Copyright © 2020, Sieracki et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dermatology
Sieracki, James
Wilkes, Robert
Bennett, Eric R
McNulty, Amy K
Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title_full Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title_short Finite Element Analysis Modeling of a Novel Silicone Dressing
title_sort finite element analysis modeling of a novel silicone dressing
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123442
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10629
work_keys_str_mv AT sierackijames finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing
AT wilkesrobert finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing
AT bennettericr finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing
AT mcnultyamyk finiteelementanalysismodelingofanovelsiliconedressing