Cargando…

Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: Chordee correction, urethroplasty, and tissue reconstruction are performed to correct and retain standard functionality of the penis in hypospadias. Conventional reconstruction techniques, such as onlay island flap and the dorsal inlay graft, can be performed based on the classification...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aritonang, Johannes, Rodjani, Arry, Wahyudi, Irfan, Situmorang, Gerhard Reinaldi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117748
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S266886
_version_ 1783599605713207296
author Aritonang, Johannes
Rodjani, Arry
Wahyudi, Irfan
Situmorang, Gerhard Reinaldi
author_facet Aritonang, Johannes
Rodjani, Arry
Wahyudi, Irfan
Situmorang, Gerhard Reinaldi
author_sort Aritonang, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chordee correction, urethroplasty, and tissue reconstruction are performed to correct and retain standard functionality of the penis in hypospadias. Conventional reconstruction techniques, such as onlay island flap and the dorsal inlay graft, can be performed based on the classification of hypospadias. However, the outcomes and complication rates have not been widely studied. Thus, we aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of both approaches in hypospadias reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study with two time evaluations of 14 and 180 days post-operatively was performed at the Urology outpatient clinic from October 2014 to September 2019. A proportion comparison of success rate, time to the complication, operation time, catheterization duration, uroflowmetry parameter post-surgery, and mean scores comparison of PPPS were measured as the intended outcomes. RESULTS: In a total of 59 pediatric hypospadias, patients who had undergone reconstruction are included in this study. Higher subjects’ age and severe chordee severity were more common in the dorsal inlay graft group (age=7.50 [1–26] months; severe chordee 45.8%) compared to the onlay island flap group (age=4.0 [1–67] months; severe chordee 31.4%), both groups showed similar satisfaction regarding meatal shape and position (P=0.618), glands shape (P=0.324), penile skin shape (P=0.489), and general cosmetic appearance (P=0.526). Complication occurrence and time to complication duration of both groups were also not statistically significant (P=0.464 and P=0.413). There are no significant differences in Q(max), Q(mean), voided volume, and PVR of both groups (P=0.125, 0.136, 0.076, 0.260, respectively). Significant differences in operation times and catheterization duration are found in this study (P<0001). CONCLUSION: Outcome evaluation regarding functional, complication and patient satisfaction comparing onlay flap and dorsal inlay graft for hypospadias patients is scarce. This study found that both procedures can be considered safe with comparable incidence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75845022020-10-27 Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study Aritonang, Johannes Rodjani, Arry Wahyudi, Irfan Situmorang, Gerhard Reinaldi Res Rep Urol Original Research BACKGROUND: Chordee correction, urethroplasty, and tissue reconstruction are performed to correct and retain standard functionality of the penis in hypospadias. Conventional reconstruction techniques, such as onlay island flap and the dorsal inlay graft, can be performed based on the classification of hypospadias. However, the outcomes and complication rates have not been widely studied. Thus, we aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of both approaches in hypospadias reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study with two time evaluations of 14 and 180 days post-operatively was performed at the Urology outpatient clinic from October 2014 to September 2019. A proportion comparison of success rate, time to the complication, operation time, catheterization duration, uroflowmetry parameter post-surgery, and mean scores comparison of PPPS were measured as the intended outcomes. RESULTS: In a total of 59 pediatric hypospadias, patients who had undergone reconstruction are included in this study. Higher subjects’ age and severe chordee severity were more common in the dorsal inlay graft group (age=7.50 [1–26] months; severe chordee 45.8%) compared to the onlay island flap group (age=4.0 [1–67] months; severe chordee 31.4%), both groups showed similar satisfaction regarding meatal shape and position (P=0.618), glands shape (P=0.324), penile skin shape (P=0.489), and general cosmetic appearance (P=0.526). Complication occurrence and time to complication duration of both groups were also not statistically significant (P=0.464 and P=0.413). There are no significant differences in Q(max), Q(mean), voided volume, and PVR of both groups (P=0.125, 0.136, 0.076, 0.260, respectively). Significant differences in operation times and catheterization duration are found in this study (P<0001). CONCLUSION: Outcome evaluation regarding functional, complication and patient satisfaction comparing onlay flap and dorsal inlay graft for hypospadias patients is scarce. This study found that both procedures can be considered safe with comparable incidence of complications. Dove 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7584502/ /pubmed/33117748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S266886 Text en © 2020 Aritonang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Aritonang, Johannes
Rodjani, Arry
Wahyudi, Irfan
Situmorang, Gerhard Reinaldi
Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title_full Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title_short Comparison of Outcome and Success Rate of Onlay Island Flap and Dorsal Inlay Graft in Hypospadias Reconstruction: A Prospective Study
title_sort comparison of outcome and success rate of onlay island flap and dorsal inlay graft in hypospadias reconstruction: a prospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117748
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S266886
work_keys_str_mv AT aritonangjohannes comparisonofoutcomeandsuccessrateofonlayislandflapanddorsalinlaygraftinhypospadiasreconstructionaprospectivestudy
AT rodjaniarry comparisonofoutcomeandsuccessrateofonlayislandflapanddorsalinlaygraftinhypospadiasreconstructionaprospectivestudy
AT wahyudiirfan comparisonofoutcomeandsuccessrateofonlayislandflapanddorsalinlaygraftinhypospadiasreconstructionaprospectivestudy
AT situmoranggerhardreinaldi comparisonofoutcomeandsuccessrateofonlayislandflapanddorsalinlaygraftinhypospadiasreconstructionaprospectivestudy