Cargando…
Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9 |
_version_ | 1783599619897294848 |
---|---|
author | Nakano, Naoki Shoman, Haitham Olavarria, Fernando Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Kuroda, Ryosuke Khanduja, Vikas |
author_facet | Nakano, Naoki Shoman, Haitham Olavarria, Fernando Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Kuroda, Ryosuke Khanduja, Vikas |
author_sort | Nakano, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers searched the online databases for literature describing factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Any clinical outcome study that described factors relating to overall satisfaction after primary TKR was included. Quality assessment for the included studies was performed by two accredited orthopaedic surgeons experienced in clinical research. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 181 relevant articles in total. A history of mental health problems was the most frequently reported factor affecting patient satisfaction (13 reportings). When the results of the quality assessment were taken into consideration, a negative history of mental health problems, use of a mobile-bearing insert, patellar resurfacing, severe pre-operative radiological degenerative change, negative history of low back pain, no/less post-operative pain, good post-operative physical function and pre-operative expectations being met were considered to be important factors leading to better patient satisfaction following a TKR. CONCLUSION: Surgeons performing a TKR should take these factors into consideration prior to deciding whether a patient is suitable for a TKR. Secondarily, a detailed explanation of these factors should form part of the process of informed consent to achieve better patient satisfaction following TKR. There is a great need for a unified approach to assessing satisfaction following a TKR and also the time at which satisfaction is assessed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7584563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75845632020-10-27 Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review Nakano, Naoki Shoman, Haitham Olavarria, Fernando Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Kuroda, Ryosuke Khanduja, Vikas Int Orthop Original Paper BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers searched the online databases for literature describing factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Any clinical outcome study that described factors relating to overall satisfaction after primary TKR was included. Quality assessment for the included studies was performed by two accredited orthopaedic surgeons experienced in clinical research. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 181 relevant articles in total. A history of mental health problems was the most frequently reported factor affecting patient satisfaction (13 reportings). When the results of the quality assessment were taken into consideration, a negative history of mental health problems, use of a mobile-bearing insert, patellar resurfacing, severe pre-operative radiological degenerative change, negative history of low back pain, no/less post-operative pain, good post-operative physical function and pre-operative expectations being met were considered to be important factors leading to better patient satisfaction following a TKR. CONCLUSION: Surgeons performing a TKR should take these factors into consideration prior to deciding whether a patient is suitable for a TKR. Secondarily, a detailed explanation of these factors should form part of the process of informed consent to achieve better patient satisfaction following TKR. There is a great need for a unified approach to assessing satisfaction following a TKR and also the time at which satisfaction is assessed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7584563/ /pubmed/32642827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nakano, Naoki Shoman, Haitham Olavarria, Fernando Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Kuroda, Ryosuke Khanduja, Vikas Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title | Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_full | Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_short | Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review |
title_sort | why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakanonaoki whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT shomanhaitham whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT olavarriafernando whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT matsumototomoyuki whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT kurodaryosuke whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview AT khandujavikas whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview |