Cargando…

Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakano, Naoki, Shoman, Haitham, Olavarria, Fernando, Matsumoto, Tomoyuki, Kuroda, Ryosuke, Khanduja, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9
_version_ 1783599619897294848
author Nakano, Naoki
Shoman, Haitham
Olavarria, Fernando
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Kuroda, Ryosuke
Khanduja, Vikas
author_facet Nakano, Naoki
Shoman, Haitham
Olavarria, Fernando
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Kuroda, Ryosuke
Khanduja, Vikas
author_sort Nakano, Naoki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers searched the online databases for literature describing factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Any clinical outcome study that described factors relating to overall satisfaction after primary TKR was included. Quality assessment for the included studies was performed by two accredited orthopaedic surgeons experienced in clinical research. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 181 relevant articles in total. A history of mental health problems was the most frequently reported factor affecting patient satisfaction (13 reportings). When the results of the quality assessment were taken into consideration, a negative history of mental health problems, use of a mobile-bearing insert, patellar resurfacing, severe pre-operative radiological degenerative change, negative history of low back pain, no/less post-operative pain, good post-operative physical function and pre-operative expectations being met were considered to be important factors leading to better patient satisfaction following a TKR. CONCLUSION: Surgeons performing a TKR should take these factors into consideration prior to deciding whether a patient is suitable for a TKR. Secondarily, a detailed explanation of these factors should form part of the process of informed consent to achieve better patient satisfaction following TKR. There is a great need for a unified approach to assessing satisfaction following a TKR and also the time at which satisfaction is assessed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75845632020-10-27 Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review Nakano, Naoki Shoman, Haitham Olavarria, Fernando Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Kuroda, Ryosuke Khanduja, Vikas Int Orthop Original Paper BACKGROUND: Although total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective intervention for end-stage arthritis of the knee, a significant number of patients remain dissatisfied following this procedure. Our aim was to identify and assess the factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers searched the online databases for literature describing factors affecting patient satisfaction following a TKR. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Any clinical outcome study that described factors relating to overall satisfaction after primary TKR was included. Quality assessment for the included studies was performed by two accredited orthopaedic surgeons experienced in clinical research. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 181 relevant articles in total. A history of mental health problems was the most frequently reported factor affecting patient satisfaction (13 reportings). When the results of the quality assessment were taken into consideration, a negative history of mental health problems, use of a mobile-bearing insert, patellar resurfacing, severe pre-operative radiological degenerative change, negative history of low back pain, no/less post-operative pain, good post-operative physical function and pre-operative expectations being met were considered to be important factors leading to better patient satisfaction following a TKR. CONCLUSION: Surgeons performing a TKR should take these factors into consideration prior to deciding whether a patient is suitable for a TKR. Secondarily, a detailed explanation of these factors should form part of the process of informed consent to achieve better patient satisfaction following TKR. There is a great need for a unified approach to assessing satisfaction following a TKR and also the time at which satisfaction is assessed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7584563/ /pubmed/32642827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nakano, Naoki
Shoman, Haitham
Olavarria, Fernando
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Kuroda, Ryosuke
Khanduja, Vikas
Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title_full Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title_fullStr Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title_short Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review
title_sort why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanonaoki whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT shomanhaitham whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT olavarriafernando whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT matsumototomoyuki whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT kurodaryosuke whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT khandujavikas whyarepatientsdissatisfiedfollowingatotalkneereplacementasystematicreview