Cargando…

Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population

Evolutionary models show that human cooperation can arise through direct reciprocity relationships. However, it remains unclear which psychological mechanisms proximally motivate individuals to reciprocate. Recent evidence suggests that the psychological motives for choosing to reciprocate trust dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Baar, Jeroen M., Klaassen, Felix H., Ricci, Filippo, Chang, Luke J., Sanfey, Alan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74818-y
_version_ 1783599642711162880
author van Baar, Jeroen M.
Klaassen, Felix H.
Ricci, Filippo
Chang, Luke J.
Sanfey, Alan G.
author_facet van Baar, Jeroen M.
Klaassen, Felix H.
Ricci, Filippo
Chang, Luke J.
Sanfey, Alan G.
author_sort van Baar, Jeroen M.
collection PubMed
description Evolutionary models show that human cooperation can arise through direct reciprocity relationships. However, it remains unclear which psychological mechanisms proximally motivate individuals to reciprocate. Recent evidence suggests that the psychological motives for choosing to reciprocate trust differ between individuals, which raises the question whether these differences have a stable distribution in a population or are rather an artifact of the experimental task. Here, we combine data from three independent trust game studies to find that the relative prevalence of different reciprocity motives is highly stable across participant samples. Furthermore, the distribution of motives is relatively unaffected by changes to the salient features of the experimental paradigm. Finally, the motive classification assigned by our computational modeling analysis corresponds to the participants’ own subjective experience of their psychological decision process, and no existing models of social preference can account for the observed individual differences in reciprocity motives. These findings support the view that reciprocal decision-making is not just regulated by individual differences in 'pro-social’ versus ‘pro-self’ tendencies, but also by trait-like differences across several alternative pro-social motives, whose distribution in a population is stable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7584663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75846632020-10-27 Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population van Baar, Jeroen M. Klaassen, Felix H. Ricci, Filippo Chang, Luke J. Sanfey, Alan G. Sci Rep Article Evolutionary models show that human cooperation can arise through direct reciprocity relationships. However, it remains unclear which psychological mechanisms proximally motivate individuals to reciprocate. Recent evidence suggests that the psychological motives for choosing to reciprocate trust differ between individuals, which raises the question whether these differences have a stable distribution in a population or are rather an artifact of the experimental task. Here, we combine data from three independent trust game studies to find that the relative prevalence of different reciprocity motives is highly stable across participant samples. Furthermore, the distribution of motives is relatively unaffected by changes to the salient features of the experimental paradigm. Finally, the motive classification assigned by our computational modeling analysis corresponds to the participants’ own subjective experience of their psychological decision process, and no existing models of social preference can account for the observed individual differences in reciprocity motives. These findings support the view that reciprocal decision-making is not just regulated by individual differences in 'pro-social’ versus ‘pro-self’ tendencies, but also by trait-like differences across several alternative pro-social motives, whose distribution in a population is stable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7584663/ /pubmed/33097738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74818-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van Baar, Jeroen M.
Klaassen, Felix H.
Ricci, Filippo
Chang, Luke J.
Sanfey, Alan G.
Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title_full Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title_fullStr Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title_full_unstemmed Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title_short Stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
title_sort stable distribution of reciprocity motives in a population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74818-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbaarjeroenm stabledistributionofreciprocitymotivesinapopulation
AT klaassenfelixh stabledistributionofreciprocitymotivesinapopulation
AT riccifilippo stabledistributionofreciprocitymotivesinapopulation
AT changlukej stabledistributionofreciprocitymotivesinapopulation
AT sanfeyalang stabledistributionofreciprocitymotivesinapopulation