Cargando…
A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipopr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8 |
_version_ | 1783599652641177600 |
---|---|
author | Koren, Michael J. Jones, Peter H. Robinson, Jennifer G. Sullivan, David Cho, Leslie Hucko, Thomas Lopez, J. Antonio G. Fleishman, Alex N. Somaratne, Ransi Stroes, Erik |
author_facet | Koren, Michael J. Jones, Peter H. Robinson, Jennifer G. Sullivan, David Cho, Leslie Hucko, Thomas Lopez, J. Antonio G. Fleishman, Alex N. Somaratne, Ransi Stroes, Erik |
author_sort | Koren, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control on maximally tolerated statin or for those who are statin-intolerant. Ezetimibe and evolocumab improve CV outcomes when added to statins in high-CV-risk populations. The aim of the study was to compare evolocumab and ezetimibe for lipid-lowering efficacy and safety. METHODS: We summarized data from 1427 patients from three phase 3 evolocumab studies comparing double-blinded evolocumab vs. ezetimibe. These studies evaluated four distinct populations: those free of CVD receiving each agent as monotherapy, patients with CVD receiving add-on therapy to low- or high-intensity statin, and statin-intolerant patients. Lipid efficacy and safety were reported at week 12. RESULTS: Across the studies, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by a mean 55–61% from baseline to week 12; ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 18–20% from baseline (mean difference = 38–43% favoring evolocumab; p < 0.0001). This corresponded to absolute reductions in LDL-C of 60–104 mg/dL with evolocumab vs. 17–35 mg/dL with ezetimibe. Evolocumab also significantly improved other lipids and led to a higher percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals vs. ezetimibe. Adverse events and discontinuation rates (oral and parenteral therapy) were balanced across groups, suggesting good tolerance and acceptance of both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab outperformed ezetimibe in efficacy and lipid goal attainment. Both products demonstrated good safety/tolerability. These data may help guide access decisions for high-risk patients with inadequate treatment response or intolerance to statin therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7584715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75847152020-10-29 A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies Koren, Michael J. Jones, Peter H. Robinson, Jennifer G. Sullivan, David Cho, Leslie Hucko, Thomas Lopez, J. Antonio G. Fleishman, Alex N. Somaratne, Ransi Stroes, Erik Cardiol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control on maximally tolerated statin or for those who are statin-intolerant. Ezetimibe and evolocumab improve CV outcomes when added to statins in high-CV-risk populations. The aim of the study was to compare evolocumab and ezetimibe for lipid-lowering efficacy and safety. METHODS: We summarized data from 1427 patients from three phase 3 evolocumab studies comparing double-blinded evolocumab vs. ezetimibe. These studies evaluated four distinct populations: those free of CVD receiving each agent as monotherapy, patients with CVD receiving add-on therapy to low- or high-intensity statin, and statin-intolerant patients. Lipid efficacy and safety were reported at week 12. RESULTS: Across the studies, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by a mean 55–61% from baseline to week 12; ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 18–20% from baseline (mean difference = 38–43% favoring evolocumab; p < 0.0001). This corresponded to absolute reductions in LDL-C of 60–104 mg/dL with evolocumab vs. 17–35 mg/dL with ezetimibe. Evolocumab also significantly improved other lipids and led to a higher percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals vs. ezetimibe. Adverse events and discontinuation rates (oral and parenteral therapy) were balanced across groups, suggesting good tolerance and acceptance of both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab outperformed ezetimibe in efficacy and lipid goal attainment. Both products demonstrated good safety/tolerability. These data may help guide access decisions for high-risk patients with inadequate treatment response or intolerance to statin therapy. Springer Healthcare 2020-06-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7584715/ /pubmed/32564340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Koren, Michael J. Jones, Peter H. Robinson, Jennifer G. Sullivan, David Cho, Leslie Hucko, Thomas Lopez, J. Antonio G. Fleishman, Alex N. Somaratne, Ransi Stroes, Erik A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title | A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title_full | A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title_short | A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies |
title_sort | comparison of ezetimibe and evolocumab for atherogenic lipid reduction in four patient populations: a pooled efficacy and safety analysis of three phase 3 studies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korenmichaelj acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT jonespeterh acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT robinsonjenniferg acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT sullivandavid acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT choleslie acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT huckothomas acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT lopezjantoniog acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT fleishmanalexn acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT somaratneransi acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT stroeserik acomparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT korenmichaelj comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT jonespeterh comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT robinsonjenniferg comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT sullivandavid comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT choleslie comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT huckothomas comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT lopezjantoniog comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT fleishmanalexn comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT somaratneransi comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies AT stroeserik comparisonofezetimibeandevolocumabforatherogeniclipidreductioninfourpatientpopulationsapooledefficacyandsafetyanalysisofthreephase3studies |