Cargando…

Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular (AC) separation can be treated with the use of a hook plate. Some studies have reported that coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation is necessary to reduce the complications of hook plate fixation, whereas others recommend hook plate fixation alone without augmentat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chung-Ting, Yang, Ten-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03726-z
_version_ 1783599743162646528
author Liu, Chung-Ting
Yang, Ten-Fang
author_facet Liu, Chung-Ting
Yang, Ten-Fang
author_sort Liu, Chung-Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular (AC) separation can be treated with the use of a hook plate. Some studies have reported that coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation is necessary to reduce the complications of hook plate fixation, whereas others recommend hook plate fixation alone without augmentation. The aim of this study was to compare the results and complications between these two groups. METHODS: This was an observational case-control study. Patients with acute (less than 2 weeks) Rockwood type V AC separation were treated with a hook plate at our hospital. A total of 105 cases received hook plate fixation with CC ligament augmentation (group I), and 112 cases received hook plate fixation without augmentation (group II). Constant-Murley scores were used to evaluate the function before and after implant removal, and radiographs were taken to evaluate the complications. The results and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: Before removal, the Constant-Murley score was significantly higher in group I (mean, 50.1) than in group II (mean, 42.6) (p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference between groups at 3 and 6 months after removal. The incidence of significant acromion osteolysis was higher in group II (65/112) than in group I (25/105). Before removal, the patients with significant acromion osteolysis had worse Constant-Murley scores than those of the patients without osteolysis in both groups. The incidence of peri-implant fracture of the hook plate was higher in group II (8/112) than in group I (1/105). CONCLUSION: The patients without CC ligament augmentation had worse functional results before hook plate removal, a higher incidence of radiographic acromion osteolysis, and a higher incidence of peri-implant fractures than those patients with CC ligament augmentation. Therefore, CC ligament augmentation is highly recommended to improve short-term outcomes and decrease complications for Rockwood type V AC separation treated by hook plate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7585224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75852242020-10-26 Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation Liu, Chung-Ting Yang, Ten-Fang BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular (AC) separation can be treated with the use of a hook plate. Some studies have reported that coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation is necessary to reduce the complications of hook plate fixation, whereas others recommend hook plate fixation alone without augmentation. The aim of this study was to compare the results and complications between these two groups. METHODS: This was an observational case-control study. Patients with acute (less than 2 weeks) Rockwood type V AC separation were treated with a hook plate at our hospital. A total of 105 cases received hook plate fixation with CC ligament augmentation (group I), and 112 cases received hook plate fixation without augmentation (group II). Constant-Murley scores were used to evaluate the function before and after implant removal, and radiographs were taken to evaluate the complications. The results and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: Before removal, the Constant-Murley score was significantly higher in group I (mean, 50.1) than in group II (mean, 42.6) (p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference between groups at 3 and 6 months after removal. The incidence of significant acromion osteolysis was higher in group II (65/112) than in group I (25/105). Before removal, the patients with significant acromion osteolysis had worse Constant-Murley scores than those of the patients without osteolysis in both groups. The incidence of peri-implant fracture of the hook plate was higher in group II (8/112) than in group I (1/105). CONCLUSION: The patients without CC ligament augmentation had worse functional results before hook plate removal, a higher incidence of radiographic acromion osteolysis, and a higher incidence of peri-implant fractures than those patients with CC ligament augmentation. Therefore, CC ligament augmentation is highly recommended to improve short-term outcomes and decrease complications for Rockwood type V AC separation treated by hook plate. BioMed Central 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7585224/ /pubmed/33097023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03726-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Chung-Ting
Yang, Ten-Fang
Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title_full Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title_fullStr Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title_full_unstemmed Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title_short Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
title_sort hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03726-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchungting hookplatewithorwithoutcoracoclavicularligamentaugmentationinthetreatmentofacuteacromioclavicularseparation
AT yangtenfang hookplatewithorwithoutcoracoclavicularligamentaugmentationinthetreatmentofacuteacromioclavicularseparation