Cargando…
The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later
For over 100 years, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been the cornerstone for detecting prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In recent decades, controversies have arisen identifying internationally acceptable cut points using fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h post-load glucose (2-h PG),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S246062 |
_version_ | 1783599753365291008 |
---|---|
author | Jagannathan, Ram Neves, João Sérgio Dorcely, Brenda Chung, Stephanie T Tamura, Kosuke Rhee, Mary Bergman, Michael |
author_facet | Jagannathan, Ram Neves, João Sérgio Dorcely, Brenda Chung, Stephanie T Tamura, Kosuke Rhee, Mary Bergman, Michael |
author_sort | Jagannathan, Ram |
collection | PubMed |
description | For over 100 years, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been the cornerstone for detecting prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In recent decades, controversies have arisen identifying internationally acceptable cut points using fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h post-load glucose (2-h PG), and/or HbA1c for defining intermediate hyperglycemia (prediabetes). Despite this, there has been a steadfast global consensus of the 2-h PG for defining dysglycemic states during the OGTT. This article reviews the history of the OGTT and recent advances in its application, including the glucose challenge test and mathematical modeling for determining the shape of the glucose curve. Pitfalls of the FPG, 2-h PG during the OGTT, and HbA1c are considered as well. Finally, the associations between the 30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose (1-h PG) levels derived from the OGTT and incidence of diabetes and its complications will be reviewed. The considerable evidence base supports modifying current screening and diagnostic recommendations with the use of the 1‐h PG. Measurement of the 1‐h PG level could increase the likelihood of identifying high-risk individuals when the pancreatic ß-cell function is substantially more intact with the added practical advantage of potentially replacing the conventional 2‐h OGTT making it more acceptable in the clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7585270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75852702020-10-27 The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later Jagannathan, Ram Neves, João Sérgio Dorcely, Brenda Chung, Stephanie T Tamura, Kosuke Rhee, Mary Bergman, Michael Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Review For over 100 years, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been the cornerstone for detecting prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In recent decades, controversies have arisen identifying internationally acceptable cut points using fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h post-load glucose (2-h PG), and/or HbA1c for defining intermediate hyperglycemia (prediabetes). Despite this, there has been a steadfast global consensus of the 2-h PG for defining dysglycemic states during the OGTT. This article reviews the history of the OGTT and recent advances in its application, including the glucose challenge test and mathematical modeling for determining the shape of the glucose curve. Pitfalls of the FPG, 2-h PG during the OGTT, and HbA1c are considered as well. Finally, the associations between the 30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose (1-h PG) levels derived from the OGTT and incidence of diabetes and its complications will be reviewed. The considerable evidence base supports modifying current screening and diagnostic recommendations with the use of the 1‐h PG. Measurement of the 1‐h PG level could increase the likelihood of identifying high-risk individuals when the pancreatic ß-cell function is substantially more intact with the added practical advantage of potentially replacing the conventional 2‐h OGTT making it more acceptable in the clinical setting. Dove 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7585270/ /pubmed/33116727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S246062 Text en © 2020 Jagannathan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Jagannathan, Ram Neves, João Sérgio Dorcely, Brenda Chung, Stephanie T Tamura, Kosuke Rhee, Mary Bergman, Michael The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title | The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title_full | The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title_fullStr | The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title_full_unstemmed | The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title_short | The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later |
title_sort | oral glucose tolerance test: 100 years later |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S246062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jagannathanram theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT nevesjoaosergio theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT dorcelybrenda theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT chungstephaniet theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT tamurakosuke theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT rheemary theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT bergmanmichael theoralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT jagannathanram oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT nevesjoaosergio oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT dorcelybrenda oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT chungstephaniet oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT tamurakosuke oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT rheemary oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater AT bergmanmichael oralglucosetolerancetest100yearslater |