Cargando…
Disagreement, Unenforceability, and Harm Reduction
Talk of harm reduction has expanded horizontally, to apply to an ever-widening range of policy domains, and vertically, becoming part of official legal and political discourse. This expansion calls for philosophical theorization. What is the best way in which to characterize harm reduction? Does it...
Autor principal: | Weinstock, Daniel M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00409-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Harm Reduction: A Research Agenda
por: Dea, Shannon, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Skeptical Arguments and Deep Disagreement
por: Melchior, Guido
Publicado: (2021) -
Disagreement, Certainties, Relativism
por: Kusch, Martin
Publicado: (2018)