Cargando…

A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis

Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keohane, David, O'Leary, Peter, Nagle, Matthew, Cichelli, Kim, McCormack, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133811
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641
_version_ 1783599979810521088
author Keohane, David
O'Leary, Peter
Nagle, Matthew
Cichelli, Kim
McCormack, Tom
author_facet Keohane, David
O'Leary, Peter
Nagle, Matthew
Cichelli, Kim
McCormack, Tom
author_sort Keohane, David
collection PubMed
description Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to combine routine blood markers to increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing histologically confirmed appendicitis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the theatre logs for the calendar year of 2015 to identify all of the appendectomies which were performed. We reviewed all of the admission bloods for the patients - including their white blood cell (WBC) count, their neutrophil count, and their C-Reactive protein (CRP) value. We also reviewed all of the histology to identify the inflamed appendices, and analysed all of this information together. Results The neutrophil count is the most sensitive of the three blood markers with a score of 82%. It has a specificity of 63%. The CRP value is the most specific of the three blood markers with a value of 67% and a sensitivity of 76%. WBC has a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 63%. Combining all of the blood values (i.e. elevated white blood cell count or elevated neutrophil count or elevated CRP) demonstrates a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 45%. Conclusion Combining routine admission blood markers (WBC, neutrophil count, and CRP) can assist in diagnosing appendicitis in unwell patients with abdominal pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75863592020-10-29 A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis Keohane, David O'Leary, Peter Nagle, Matthew Cichelli, Kim McCormack, Tom Cureus General Surgery Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to combine routine blood markers to increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing histologically confirmed appendicitis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the theatre logs for the calendar year of 2015 to identify all of the appendectomies which were performed. We reviewed all of the admission bloods for the patients - including their white blood cell (WBC) count, their neutrophil count, and their C-Reactive protein (CRP) value. We also reviewed all of the histology to identify the inflamed appendices, and analysed all of this information together. Results The neutrophil count is the most sensitive of the three blood markers with a score of 82%. It has a specificity of 63%. The CRP value is the most specific of the three blood markers with a value of 67% and a sensitivity of 76%. WBC has a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 63%. Combining all of the blood values (i.e. elevated white blood cell count or elevated neutrophil count or elevated CRP) demonstrates a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 45%. Conclusion Combining routine admission blood markers (WBC, neutrophil count, and CRP) can assist in diagnosing appendicitis in unwell patients with abdominal pain. Cureus 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7586359/ /pubmed/33133811 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641 Text en Copyright © 2020, Keohane et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Keohane, David
O'Leary, Peter
Nagle, Matthew
Cichelli, Kim
McCormack, Tom
A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title_full A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title_fullStr A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title_short A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
title_sort correlation of blood panel results and histologically confirmed appendicitis
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133811
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641
work_keys_str_mv AT keohanedavid acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT olearypeter acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT naglematthew acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT cichellikim acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT mccormacktom acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT keohanedavid correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT olearypeter correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT naglematthew correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT cichellikim correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis
AT mccormacktom correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis