Cargando…
A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis
Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133811 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641 |
_version_ | 1783599979810521088 |
---|---|
author | Keohane, David O'Leary, Peter Nagle, Matthew Cichelli, Kim McCormack, Tom |
author_facet | Keohane, David O'Leary, Peter Nagle, Matthew Cichelli, Kim McCormack, Tom |
author_sort | Keohane, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to combine routine blood markers to increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing histologically confirmed appendicitis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the theatre logs for the calendar year of 2015 to identify all of the appendectomies which were performed. We reviewed all of the admission bloods for the patients - including their white blood cell (WBC) count, their neutrophil count, and their C-Reactive protein (CRP) value. We also reviewed all of the histology to identify the inflamed appendices, and analysed all of this information together. Results The neutrophil count is the most sensitive of the three blood markers with a score of 82%. It has a specificity of 63%. The CRP value is the most specific of the three blood markers with a value of 67% and a sensitivity of 76%. WBC has a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 63%. Combining all of the blood values (i.e. elevated white blood cell count or elevated neutrophil count or elevated CRP) demonstrates a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 45%. Conclusion Combining routine admission blood markers (WBC, neutrophil count, and CRP) can assist in diagnosing appendicitis in unwell patients with abdominal pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7586359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75863592020-10-29 A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis Keohane, David O'Leary, Peter Nagle, Matthew Cichelli, Kim McCormack, Tom Cureus General Surgery Background Appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency surgery in the world. There is no one laboratory or radiological test that is used to diagnose it. Various routine and novel blood markers have been identified, however none have proved to be conclusive. The aim of this study was to combine routine blood markers to increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing histologically confirmed appendicitis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the theatre logs for the calendar year of 2015 to identify all of the appendectomies which were performed. We reviewed all of the admission bloods for the patients - including their white blood cell (WBC) count, their neutrophil count, and their C-Reactive protein (CRP) value. We also reviewed all of the histology to identify the inflamed appendices, and analysed all of this information together. Results The neutrophil count is the most sensitive of the three blood markers with a score of 82%. It has a specificity of 63%. The CRP value is the most specific of the three blood markers with a value of 67% and a sensitivity of 76%. WBC has a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 63%. Combining all of the blood values (i.e. elevated white blood cell count or elevated neutrophil count or elevated CRP) demonstrates a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 45%. Conclusion Combining routine admission blood markers (WBC, neutrophil count, and CRP) can assist in diagnosing appendicitis in unwell patients with abdominal pain. Cureus 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7586359/ /pubmed/33133811 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641 Text en Copyright © 2020, Keohane et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Keohane, David O'Leary, Peter Nagle, Matthew Cichelli, Kim McCormack, Tom A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title | A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title_full | A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title_fullStr | A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title_short | A Correlation of Blood Panel Results and Histologically Confirmed Appendicitis |
title_sort | correlation of blood panel results and histologically confirmed appendicitis |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133811 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keohanedavid acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT olearypeter acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT naglematthew acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT cichellikim acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT mccormacktom acorrelationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT keohanedavid correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT olearypeter correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT naglematthew correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT cichellikim correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis AT mccormacktom correlationofbloodpanelresultsandhistologicallyconfirmedappendicitis |