Cargando…
The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: In a tertiary care hospital that caters to all kinds of patients in the clinical and emergency setting, consultation is an important service provided by the urology team. Profiling the spectrum of urologic disease encountered by trainees will assist in the planning of residency curricula...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133835 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10668 |
_version_ | 1783599993390628864 |
---|---|
author | Kazmi, Zehra Khan, Kaleem Ather, M Hammad |
author_facet | Kazmi, Zehra Khan, Kaleem Ather, M Hammad |
author_sort | Kazmi, Zehra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In a tertiary care hospital that caters to all kinds of patients in the clinical and emergency setting, consultation is an important service provided by the urology team. Profiling the spectrum of urologic disease encountered by trainees will assist in the planning of residency curricula and is bound to improve patient outcome for procedural education. Methods: All urologic consultation requests received over a period of three months (November 22, 2019, to February 22, 2020) were identified and recorded in a prospectively maintained consult log. Information collected for each encounter included the time, date, reason for consult, primary service and diagnosis along with the final urologic diagnosis, any urologic intervention, and basic patient demographics (gender and age). Results: Over three months, a total of 568 consult requests were reviewed. Of the patients consulted for, 74% were males; the mean age was 58.45 years (SD+/-19.5 years). The most common service seeking urology consult was the Emergency Room (n=240, 42.25%). The most common reason for consultation was hematuria (n=103, 18.13%) followed by obstructive uropathy (n=98, 17.25%). The majority (n=147, 26%) of the calls were placed between mid-day and 4 pm. Of the total, 26% required immediate attention. Urologic intervention was required in 226 (39.8%). The number of consults seen by junior team members was 478 (84.14%). Conclusion: Hematuria and obstructive uropathy are the most common reasons for urologic consultation requests. Nearly two-thirds of the consults either required immediate attention or intervention. Most of the consults were seen by junior residents, who required elaborate training to address these common issues independently. We believe that our results will be helpful in developing a curriculum for training junior residents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7586419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75864192020-10-29 The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study Kazmi, Zehra Khan, Kaleem Ather, M Hammad Cureus Medical Education Background: In a tertiary care hospital that caters to all kinds of patients in the clinical and emergency setting, consultation is an important service provided by the urology team. Profiling the spectrum of urologic disease encountered by trainees will assist in the planning of residency curricula and is bound to improve patient outcome for procedural education. Methods: All urologic consultation requests received over a period of three months (November 22, 2019, to February 22, 2020) were identified and recorded in a prospectively maintained consult log. Information collected for each encounter included the time, date, reason for consult, primary service and diagnosis along with the final urologic diagnosis, any urologic intervention, and basic patient demographics (gender and age). Results: Over three months, a total of 568 consult requests were reviewed. Of the patients consulted for, 74% were males; the mean age was 58.45 years (SD+/-19.5 years). The most common service seeking urology consult was the Emergency Room (n=240, 42.25%). The most common reason for consultation was hematuria (n=103, 18.13%) followed by obstructive uropathy (n=98, 17.25%). The majority (n=147, 26%) of the calls were placed between mid-day and 4 pm. Of the total, 26% required immediate attention. Urologic intervention was required in 226 (39.8%). The number of consults seen by junior team members was 478 (84.14%). Conclusion: Hematuria and obstructive uropathy are the most common reasons for urologic consultation requests. Nearly two-thirds of the consults either required immediate attention or intervention. Most of the consults were seen by junior residents, who required elaborate training to address these common issues independently. We believe that our results will be helpful in developing a curriculum for training junior residents. Cureus 2020-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7586419/ /pubmed/33133835 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10668 Text en Copyright © 2020, Kazmi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education Kazmi, Zehra Khan, Kaleem Ather, M Hammad The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | The Hidden Work of Urology Residents - A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | hidden work of urology residents - a cross-sectional study |
topic | Medical Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133835 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazmizehra thehiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy AT khankaleem thehiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy AT athermhammad thehiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy AT kazmizehra hiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy AT khankaleem hiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy AT athermhammad hiddenworkofurologyresidentsacrosssectionalstudy |