Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary tee...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787 |
_version_ | 1783600003589079040 |
---|---|
author | Seema, Thakur Ahammed, Haseeb Parul, Singhal Cheranjeevi, Jayam |
author_facet | Seema, Thakur Ahammed, Haseeb Parul, Singhal Cheranjeevi, Jayam |
author_sort | Seema, Thakur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary teeth. AIM: The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of Hand K files, Rotary Prosper files, and Rotary Kedo S files using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and instrumentation time using stopwatch in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three root canals of maxillary and mandibular primary molars were included in the study. The root canals were randomly assigned to Hand K file (group I), Rotary ProTaper file (group II), and Rotary Kedo S file (group III). Dentin removal and taper of the root canal preparations were evaluated by using CBCT. RESULTS: All the three file systems do not show any statistical significant differences at middle third and apical third but at coronal third, Kedo S removed significantly less amount of dentin as compared to the Hand K file. Taper of the preparations did not show significant differences, even though the rotary files showed good taper in maximum number of root canals. CONCLUSION: Although not much statistical significant differences were observed in our study, the rotary file system performed slightly better in root canal preparations in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Seema T, Ahammed H, Parul S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(4):332–336. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7586477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75864772020-11-03 Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography Seema, Thakur Ahammed, Haseeb Parul, Singhal Cheranjeevi, Jayam Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary teeth. AIM: The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of Hand K files, Rotary Prosper files, and Rotary Kedo S files using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and instrumentation time using stopwatch in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three root canals of maxillary and mandibular primary molars were included in the study. The root canals were randomly assigned to Hand K file (group I), Rotary ProTaper file (group II), and Rotary Kedo S file (group III). Dentin removal and taper of the root canal preparations were evaluated by using CBCT. RESULTS: All the three file systems do not show any statistical significant differences at middle third and apical third but at coronal third, Kedo S removed significantly less amount of dentin as compared to the Hand K file. Taper of the preparations did not show significant differences, even though the rotary files showed good taper in maximum number of root canals. CONCLUSION: Although not much statistical significant differences were observed in our study, the rotary file system performed slightly better in root canal preparations in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Seema T, Ahammed H, Parul S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(4):332–336. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7586477/ /pubmed/33149404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Seema, Thakur Ahammed, Haseeb Parul, Singhal Cheranjeevi, Jayam Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of hand k file, protaper rotary file, and kedo s rotary file in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seemathakur comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT ahammedhaseeb comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT parulsinghal comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography AT cheranjeevijayam comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography |