Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary tee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seema, Thakur, Ahammed, Haseeb, Parul, Singhal, Cheranjeevi, Jayam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149404
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787
_version_ 1783600003589079040
author Seema, Thakur
Ahammed, Haseeb
Parul, Singhal
Cheranjeevi, Jayam
author_facet Seema, Thakur
Ahammed, Haseeb
Parul, Singhal
Cheranjeevi, Jayam
author_sort Seema, Thakur
collection PubMed
description Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary teeth. AIM: The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of Hand K files, Rotary Prosper files, and Rotary Kedo S files using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and instrumentation time using stopwatch in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three root canals of maxillary and mandibular primary molars were included in the study. The root canals were randomly assigned to Hand K file (group I), Rotary ProTaper file (group II), and Rotary Kedo S file (group III). Dentin removal and taper of the root canal preparations were evaluated by using CBCT. RESULTS: All the three file systems do not show any statistical significant differences at middle third and apical third but at coronal third, Kedo S removed significantly less amount of dentin as compared to the Hand K file. Taper of the preparations did not show significant differences, even though the rotary files showed good taper in maximum number of root canals. CONCLUSION: Although not much statistical significant differences were observed in our study, the rotary file system performed slightly better in root canal preparations in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Seema T, Ahammed H, Parul S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(4):332–336.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75864772020-11-03 Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography Seema, Thakur Ahammed, Haseeb Parul, Singhal Cheranjeevi, Jayam Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article Various rotary endodontic instruments were used and studied for the root canal preparation of the primary teeth. Recently, a new venture evolved in the field of pediatric endodontic, which was Kedo S rotary files. These are the files designed exclusively for root canal preparation of the primary teeth. AIM: The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of Hand K files, Rotary Prosper files, and Rotary Kedo S files using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and instrumentation time using stopwatch in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three root canals of maxillary and mandibular primary molars were included in the study. The root canals were randomly assigned to Hand K file (group I), Rotary ProTaper file (group II), and Rotary Kedo S file (group III). Dentin removal and taper of the root canal preparations were evaluated by using CBCT. RESULTS: All the three file systems do not show any statistical significant differences at middle third and apical third but at coronal third, Kedo S removed significantly less amount of dentin as compared to the Hand K file. Taper of the preparations did not show significant differences, even though the rotary files showed good taper in maximum number of root canals. CONCLUSION: Although not much statistical significant differences were observed in our study, the rotary file system performed slightly better in root canal preparations in primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Seema T, Ahammed H, Parul S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(4):332–336. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7586477/ /pubmed/33149404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seema, Thakur
Ahammed, Haseeb
Parul, Singhal
Cheranjeevi, Jayam
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_sort comparative evaluation of dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of hand k file, protaper rotary file, and kedo s rotary file in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149404
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787
work_keys_str_mv AT seemathakur comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ahammedhaseeb comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT parulsinghal comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography
AT cheranjeevijayam comparativeevaluationofdentinremovalandtaperofrootcanalpreparationofhandkfileprotaperrotaryfileandkedosrotaryfileinprimarymolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomography