Cargando…

The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic findings associated with Helicobacter pylori–naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the availab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glover, Ben, Teare, Julian, Ashrafian, Hutan, Patel, Nisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2631774520950840
_version_ 1783600007089225728
author Glover, Ben
Teare, Julian
Ashrafian, Hutan
Patel, Nisha
author_facet Glover, Ben
Teare, Julian
Ashrafian, Hutan
Patel, Nisha
author_sort Glover, Ben
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic findings associated with Helicobacter pylori–naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification. DATA SOURCES: The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from October 1999 to October 2019. METHODS: A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled diagnostic accuracy calculations for each of the studied endoscopic findings. Diagnostic odds ratios and sensitivity and specificity characteristics were calculated to identify significant predictors of H pylori status. RESULTS: Meta-analysis included 4380 patients in 15 studies. The most significant predictor of an H pylori-naïve status was a regular arrangement of collecting venules (diagnostic odds ratio 55.0, sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.8%). Predictors of active H pylori infection were mucosal oedema (18.1, 63.7%, 91.1%) and diffuse redness (14.4, 66.5%, 89.0%). Map-like redness had high specificity for previous H pylori eradication (99.0%), but poor specificity (13.0%). CONCLUSION: The regular arrangement of collecting venules, mucosal oedema, diffuse redness and map-like redness are important endoscopic findings for determining H pylori status. This meta-analysis provides a tentative basis for developing future endoscopic classification systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75864932020-11-03 The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance Glover, Ben Teare, Julian Ashrafian, Hutan Patel, Nisha Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic findings associated with Helicobacter pylori–naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification. DATA SOURCES: The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from October 1999 to October 2019. METHODS: A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled diagnostic accuracy calculations for each of the studied endoscopic findings. Diagnostic odds ratios and sensitivity and specificity characteristics were calculated to identify significant predictors of H pylori status. RESULTS: Meta-analysis included 4380 patients in 15 studies. The most significant predictor of an H pylori-naïve status was a regular arrangement of collecting venules (diagnostic odds ratio 55.0, sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.8%). Predictors of active H pylori infection were mucosal oedema (18.1, 63.7%, 91.1%) and diffuse redness (14.4, 66.5%, 89.0%). Map-like redness had high specificity for previous H pylori eradication (99.0%), but poor specificity (13.0%). CONCLUSION: The regular arrangement of collecting venules, mucosal oedema, diffuse redness and map-like redness are important endoscopic findings for determining H pylori status. This meta-analysis provides a tentative basis for developing future endoscopic classification systems. SAGE Publications 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7586493/ /pubmed/33150333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2631774520950840 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Glover, Ben
Teare, Julian
Ashrafian, Hutan
Patel, Nisha
The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title_full The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title_fullStr The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title_full_unstemmed The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title_short The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
title_sort endoscopic predictors of helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2631774520950840
work_keys_str_mv AT gloverben theendoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT tearejulian theendoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT ashrafianhutan theendoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT patelnisha theendoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT gloverben endoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT tearejulian endoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT ashrafianhutan endoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance
AT patelnisha endoscopicpredictorsofhelicobacterpyloristatusametaanalysisofdiagnosticperformance