Cargando…

Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy

BACKGROUND: Based on the importance of varicocele, the aim of this is to compare the comparison between doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy and microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary varicocele who were re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mombeini, Hayat, Khazaeili, Dinyar, Esmaeili, Sepehr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1152_19
_version_ 1783600008473346048
author Mombeini, Hayat
Khazaeili, Dinyar
Esmaeili, Sepehr
author_facet Mombeini, Hayat
Khazaeili, Dinyar
Esmaeili, Sepehr
author_sort Mombeini, Hayat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on the importance of varicocele, the aim of this is to compare the comparison between doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy and microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary varicocele who were referred to Ahwaz Imam Khomeini Hospital after informed consent were included. Primary information included varicocele severity, pain intensity, latency, Doppler sonography (Resistive index (RI), venous return, venous diameter before and after Valsalva) were obtained, and then patients were entered into one of the two groups of surgery. The admission duration, return to work duration, the pain and analgesic consumption, and the length of anxiety were recorded in patients. Patients were examined 3 months later, and the severity of varicocele in the examination, pain score, latency, Doppler sonography indices, sperm indices in both groups were registered. In the end, the information is entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software and evaluated. RESULTS: We observed that the severity of varicocele (P = 0.34), pain (P = 0.45), latralite (P = 0.56), RI (P = 0.65), intravenous diameter (P = 0.75) did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups, also in evaluating these indices after surgery, there were significant differences between the two groups in pain (P = 0.04) and time for return to work (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The methods used in varicocelectomy did not have any effect on the outcome of the treatment. Accordingly, using any of these methods can improve the post-surgical state of the patients and promote the fertility performance and reduction of complications due to surgery in patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75865022020-10-26 Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy Mombeini, Hayat Khazaeili, Dinyar Esmaeili, Sepehr J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Based on the importance of varicocele, the aim of this is to compare the comparison between doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy and microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary varicocele who were referred to Ahwaz Imam Khomeini Hospital after informed consent were included. Primary information included varicocele severity, pain intensity, latency, Doppler sonography (Resistive index (RI), venous return, venous diameter before and after Valsalva) were obtained, and then patients were entered into one of the two groups of surgery. The admission duration, return to work duration, the pain and analgesic consumption, and the length of anxiety were recorded in patients. Patients were examined 3 months later, and the severity of varicocele in the examination, pain score, latency, Doppler sonography indices, sperm indices in both groups were registered. In the end, the information is entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software and evaluated. RESULTS: We observed that the severity of varicocele (P = 0.34), pain (P = 0.45), latralite (P = 0.56), RI (P = 0.65), intravenous diameter (P = 0.75) did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups, also in evaluating these indices after surgery, there were significant differences between the two groups in pain (P = 0.04) and time for return to work (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The methods used in varicocelectomy did not have any effect on the outcome of the treatment. Accordingly, using any of these methods can improve the post-surgical state of the patients and promote the fertility performance and reduction of complications due to surgery in patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7586502/ /pubmed/33110802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1152_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mombeini, Hayat
Khazaeili, Dinyar
Esmaeili, Sepehr
Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title_full Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title_short Comparison of the result of Doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
title_sort comparison of the result of doppler sonography before and after laparoscopic artery and lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1152_19
work_keys_str_mv AT mombeinihayat comparisonoftheresultofdopplersonographybeforeandafterlaparoscopicarteryandlymphaticsparingvaricocelectomywithmicrosurgicalsubinguinalvaricocelectomy
AT khazaeilidinyar comparisonoftheresultofdopplersonographybeforeandafterlaparoscopicarteryandlymphaticsparingvaricocelectomywithmicrosurgicalsubinguinalvaricocelectomy
AT esmaeilisepehr comparisonoftheresultofdopplersonographybeforeandafterlaparoscopicarteryandlymphaticsparingvaricocelectomywithmicrosurgicalsubinguinalvaricocelectomy