Cargando…
Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of mandibular third molars is an important and one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in dentistry. There are a variety of postoperative complications that may follow this procedure. These include pain, trismus, infection, dry socket, or alveolar os...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_534_20 |
_version_ | 1783600016584081408 |
---|---|
author | Ghosh, Dibakar Bhardwaj, Shweta Koyalada, Soujanya Mahajan, Bela Verma, Sumit Ettishree, Nayak, Bikash |
author_facet | Ghosh, Dibakar Bhardwaj, Shweta Koyalada, Soujanya Mahajan, Bela Verma, Sumit Ettishree, Nayak, Bikash |
author_sort | Ghosh, Dibakar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of mandibular third molars is an important and one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in dentistry. There are a variety of postoperative complications that may follow this procedure. These include pain, trismus, infection, dry socket, or alveolar osteitis. Numerous techniques have been used for reducing these morbid conditions. These range from flap designs, suture placement, use of various irrigating solutions, etc., AIM: The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three irrigating solutions: Ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine in reducing postoperative complications following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 study participants formed the sample size of this study. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: Group I (third molar surgeries using ozonated water), Group II (third molar surgeries with normal saline irrigation), and Group III (third molar surgeries using povidone-iodine irrigation). Parameters studied postoperatively were alveolar osteitis (dry socket), pain, trismus, and infection after a week interval. All data obtained were entered in Microsoft Excel 2007 worksheets and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) as a statistical tool was employed. A P value of < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: It was found that ozonated water provided the best statistically proven results with comparison to normal saline and povidone-iodine in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis or dry socket and pain. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of trismus and infection rate among three studied groups. CONCLUSION: Ozonated water is the best irrigating solution when compared to normal saline and povidone-iodine in terms of reduction in pain and dry socket after a 1-week duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7586537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75865372020-10-26 Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study Ghosh, Dibakar Bhardwaj, Shweta Koyalada, Soujanya Mahajan, Bela Verma, Sumit Ettishree, Nayak, Bikash J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of mandibular third molars is an important and one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in dentistry. There are a variety of postoperative complications that may follow this procedure. These include pain, trismus, infection, dry socket, or alveolar osteitis. Numerous techniques have been used for reducing these morbid conditions. These range from flap designs, suture placement, use of various irrigating solutions, etc., AIM: The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three irrigating solutions: Ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine in reducing postoperative complications following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 study participants formed the sample size of this study. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: Group I (third molar surgeries using ozonated water), Group II (third molar surgeries with normal saline irrigation), and Group III (third molar surgeries using povidone-iodine irrigation). Parameters studied postoperatively were alveolar osteitis (dry socket), pain, trismus, and infection after a week interval. All data obtained were entered in Microsoft Excel 2007 worksheets and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) as a statistical tool was employed. A P value of < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: It was found that ozonated water provided the best statistically proven results with comparison to normal saline and povidone-iodine in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis or dry socket and pain. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of trismus and infection rate among three studied groups. CONCLUSION: Ozonated water is the best irrigating solution when compared to normal saline and povidone-iodine in terms of reduction in pain and dry socket after a 1-week duration. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7586537/ /pubmed/33110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_534_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghosh, Dibakar Bhardwaj, Shweta Koyalada, Soujanya Mahajan, Bela Verma, Sumit Ettishree, Nayak, Bikash Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title | Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | comparison of efficacy of ozonated water, normal saline, and povidone-iodine after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_534_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghoshdibakar comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT bhardwajshweta comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT koyaladasoujanya comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT mahajanbela comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT vermasumit comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT ettishree comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy AT nayakbikash comparisonofefficacyofozonatedwaternormalsalineandpovidoneiodineaftersurgicalremovalofimpactedmandibularthirdmolarsacrosssectionalstudy |