Cargando…

Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method

PURPOSE: Cardiac motion tracking enables quantitative evaluation of myocardial strain, which is clinically interesting in cardiovascular disease research. However, motion tracking is difficult to perform manually. In this paper, we aim to develop and compare two fully automated motion tracking metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiao, Mengyun, Wang, Yuanyuan, Guo, Yi, Huang, Lu, Xia, Liming, Tao, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14341
_version_ 1783600069352620032
author Qiao, Mengyun
Wang, Yuanyuan
Guo, Yi
Huang, Lu
Xia, Liming
Tao, Qian
author_facet Qiao, Mengyun
Wang, Yuanyuan
Guo, Yi
Huang, Lu
Xia, Liming
Tao, Qian
author_sort Qiao, Mengyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cardiac motion tracking enables quantitative evaluation of myocardial strain, which is clinically interesting in cardiovascular disease research. However, motion tracking is difficult to perform manually. In this paper, we aim to develop and compare two fully automated motion tracking methods for the steady state free precession (SSFP) cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and explore their use in real clinical scenario with different patient groups. METHODS: We proposed two automated cardiac motion tracking method: (a) a traditional registration‐based method, named full cardiac cycle registration, which simultaneously tracks all cine frames within a full cardiac cycle by joint registration of all frames; and (b) a modern convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based method, named Groupwise MotionNet, which enhances the temporal coherence by fusing motion along a continuous time scale. Both methods were evaluated on the healthy volunteer data from the MICCAI 2011 STACOM Challenge, as well as on patient data including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: The full cardiac cycle registration method achieved an average end‐point error (EPE) 2.89 ± 1.57 mm for cardiac motion tracking, with computation time of around 9 min per short‐axis cine MRI (size 128 × 128, 30 cardiac phases). In comparison, the Groupwise MotionNet achieved an average EPE of 0.94 ± 1.59 mm, taking < 1 s for a full cardiac phases. Further experiments showed that registration method had stable performance, independent of patient cohort and MRI machine, while the CNN‐based method relied on the training data to deliver consistently accurate results. CONCLUSION: Both registration‐based and CNN‐based method can track the cardiac motion from SSFP cine MRI in a fully automated manner, while taking temporal coherence into account. The registration method is generic, robust, but relatively slow; the CNN‐based method trained with heterogeneous data was able to achieve high tracking accuracy with real‐time performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75868162020-10-30 Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method Qiao, Mengyun Wang, Yuanyuan Guo, Yi Huang, Lu Xia, Liming Tao, Qian Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: Cardiac motion tracking enables quantitative evaluation of myocardial strain, which is clinically interesting in cardiovascular disease research. However, motion tracking is difficult to perform manually. In this paper, we aim to develop and compare two fully automated motion tracking methods for the steady state free precession (SSFP) cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and explore their use in real clinical scenario with different patient groups. METHODS: We proposed two automated cardiac motion tracking method: (a) a traditional registration‐based method, named full cardiac cycle registration, which simultaneously tracks all cine frames within a full cardiac cycle by joint registration of all frames; and (b) a modern convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based method, named Groupwise MotionNet, which enhances the temporal coherence by fusing motion along a continuous time scale. Both methods were evaluated on the healthy volunteer data from the MICCAI 2011 STACOM Challenge, as well as on patient data including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: The full cardiac cycle registration method achieved an average end‐point error (EPE) 2.89 ± 1.57 mm for cardiac motion tracking, with computation time of around 9 min per short‐axis cine MRI (size 128 × 128, 30 cardiac phases). In comparison, the Groupwise MotionNet achieved an average EPE of 0.94 ± 1.59 mm, taking < 1 s for a full cardiac phases. Further experiments showed that registration method had stable performance, independent of patient cohort and MRI machine, while the CNN‐based method relied on the training data to deliver consistently accurate results. CONCLUSION: Both registration‐based and CNN‐based method can track the cardiac motion from SSFP cine MRI in a fully automated manner, while taking temporal coherence into account. The registration method is generic, robust, but relatively slow; the CNN‐based method trained with heterogeneous data was able to achieve high tracking accuracy with real‐time performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-06 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7586816/ /pubmed/32564357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14341 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Qiao, Mengyun
Wang, Yuanyuan
Guo, Yi
Huang, Lu
Xia, Liming
Tao, Qian
Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title_full Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title_fullStr Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title_full_unstemmed Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title_short Temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine MRI: Traditional registration method and modern CNN method
title_sort temporally coherent cardiac motion tracking from cine mri: traditional registration method and modern cnn method
topic QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14341
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaomengyun temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod
AT wangyuanyuan temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod
AT guoyi temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod
AT huanglu temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod
AT xialiming temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod
AT taoqian temporallycoherentcardiacmotiontrackingfromcinemritraditionalregistrationmethodandmoderncnnmethod