Cargando…

Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera

BACKGROUND: Geographic variation in male response to sex pheromone lures has been studied in the field in a number of moth species. However, only a few studies have investigated geographic variation in female calling and sex pheromone under field conditions. For an effective field implementation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Ke, Torres‐Vila, Luis M, Zalucki, Myron P, Li, Yiping, Griepink, Frans, Heckel, David G, Groot, Astrid T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32406164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5893
_version_ 1783600072218378240
author Gao, Ke
Torres‐Vila, Luis M
Zalucki, Myron P
Li, Yiping
Griepink, Frans
Heckel, David G
Groot, Astrid T
author_facet Gao, Ke
Torres‐Vila, Luis M
Zalucki, Myron P
Li, Yiping
Griepink, Frans
Heckel, David G
Groot, Astrid T
author_sort Gao, Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geographic variation in male response to sex pheromone lures has been studied in the field in a number of moth species. However, only a few studies have investigated geographic variation in female calling and sex pheromone under field conditions. For an effective field implementation of sex pheromone lures, it is essential to know the local sex pheromone blend and local timing of sexual communication. We investigated the level and extent of geographic variation in the sexual communication of the important agricultural pest Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in three continents. RESULTS: We found there is no genetic variation in the calling behavior of H. armigera. In the female sex pheromone, we found more between‐population variation than within‐population variation. In male response experiments, we found geographic variation as well. Strikingly, when adding the antagonistic compound Z11‐16:OAc to the pheromone blend of H. armigera, significantly fewer males were caught in Australia and China, but not in Spain. This variation is likely not only due to local environmental conditions, such as photoperiod and temperature, but also to the presence of other closely related species with which communication interference may occur. CONCLUSION: Finding geographic variation in both the female sexual signal and the male response in this pest calls for region‐specific pheromone lures. Our study shows that the analysis of geographic variation in moth female sex pheromones as well as male responses is important for effectively monitoring pest species that occur around the globe. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75868282020-10-30 Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Gao, Ke Torres‐Vila, Luis M Zalucki, Myron P Li, Yiping Griepink, Frans Heckel, David G Groot, Astrid T Pest Manag Sci Research Articles BACKGROUND: Geographic variation in male response to sex pheromone lures has been studied in the field in a number of moth species. However, only a few studies have investigated geographic variation in female calling and sex pheromone under field conditions. For an effective field implementation of sex pheromone lures, it is essential to know the local sex pheromone blend and local timing of sexual communication. We investigated the level and extent of geographic variation in the sexual communication of the important agricultural pest Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in three continents. RESULTS: We found there is no genetic variation in the calling behavior of H. armigera. In the female sex pheromone, we found more between‐population variation than within‐population variation. In male response experiments, we found geographic variation as well. Strikingly, when adding the antagonistic compound Z11‐16:OAc to the pheromone blend of H. armigera, significantly fewer males were caught in Australia and China, but not in Spain. This variation is likely not only due to local environmental conditions, such as photoperiod and temperature, but also to the presence of other closely related species with which communication interference may occur. CONCLUSION: Finding geographic variation in both the female sexual signal and the male response in this pest calls for region‐specific pheromone lures. Our study shows that the analysis of geographic variation in moth female sex pheromones as well as male responses is important for effectively monitoring pest species that occur around the globe. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-06-10 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7586828/ /pubmed/32406164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5893 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gao, Ke
Torres‐Vila, Luis M
Zalucki, Myron P
Li, Yiping
Griepink, Frans
Heckel, David G
Groot, Astrid T
Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title_full Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title_fullStr Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title_full_unstemmed Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title_short Geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
title_sort geographic variation in sexual communication in the cotton bollworm, helicoverpa armigera
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32406164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5893
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoke geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT torresvilaluism geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT zaluckimyronp geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT liyiping geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT griepinkfrans geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT heckeldavidg geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera
AT grootastridt geographicvariationinsexualcommunicationinthecottonbollwormhelicoverpaarmigera