Cargando…
Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients
PURPOSE: For locally advanced‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inter‐fraction target motion variations during the whole time span of a fractionated treatment course are assessed in a large and representative patient cohort. The primary objective is to develop a suitable motion monitoring st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14345 |
_version_ | 1783600076062457856 |
---|---|
author | den Otter, Lydia A. Anakotta, Renske M. Weessies, Menkedina Roos, Catharina T. G. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Muijs, Christina T. Dieters, Margriet Wijsman, Robin Troost, Esther G. C. Richter, Christian Meijers, Arturs Langendijk, Johannes A. Both, Stefan Knopf, Antje‐Christin |
author_facet | den Otter, Lydia A. Anakotta, Renske M. Weessies, Menkedina Roos, Catharina T. G. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Muijs, Christina T. Dieters, Margriet Wijsman, Robin Troost, Esther G. C. Richter, Christian Meijers, Arturs Langendijk, Johannes A. Both, Stefan Knopf, Antje‐Christin |
author_sort | den Otter, Lydia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: For locally advanced‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inter‐fraction target motion variations during the whole time span of a fractionated treatment course are assessed in a large and representative patient cohort. The primary objective is to develop a suitable motion monitoring strategy for pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS‐PT) treatments of NSCLC patients during free breathing. METHODS: Weekly 4D computed tomography (4DCT; 41 patients) and daily 4D cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT; 10 of 41 patients) scans were analyzed for a fully fractionated treatment course. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured and the 3D displacement vectors of the centroid positions were compared for all scans. Furthermore, motion amplitude variations in different lung segments were statistically analyzed. The dosimetric impact of target motion variations and target motion assessment was investigated in exemplary patient cases. RESULTS: The median observed centroid motion was 3.4 mm (range: 0.2–12.4 mm) with an average variation of 2.2 mm (range: 0.1–8.8 mm). Ten of 32 patients (31.3%) with an initial motion <5 mm increased beyond a 5‐mm motion amplitude during the treatment course. Motion observed in the 4DCBCT scans deviated on average 1.5 mm (range: 0.0–6.0 mm) from the motion observed in the 4DCTs. Larger motion variations for one example patient compromised treatment plan robustness while no dosimetric influence was seen due to motion assessment biases in another example case. CONCLUSIONS: Target motion variations were investigated during the course of radiotherapy for NSCLC patients. Patients with initial GTV motion amplitudes of < 2 mm can be assumed to be stable in motion during the treatment course. For treatments of NSCLC patients who exhibit motion amplitudes of > 2 mm, 4DCBCT should be considered for motion monitoring due to substantial motion variations observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7586844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75868442020-10-30 Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients den Otter, Lydia A. Anakotta, Renske M. Weessies, Menkedina Roos, Catharina T. G. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Muijs, Christina T. Dieters, Margriet Wijsman, Robin Troost, Esther G. C. Richter, Christian Meijers, Arturs Langendijk, Johannes A. Both, Stefan Knopf, Antje‐Christin Med Phys THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS PURPOSE: For locally advanced‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inter‐fraction target motion variations during the whole time span of a fractionated treatment course are assessed in a large and representative patient cohort. The primary objective is to develop a suitable motion monitoring strategy for pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS‐PT) treatments of NSCLC patients during free breathing. METHODS: Weekly 4D computed tomography (4DCT; 41 patients) and daily 4D cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT; 10 of 41 patients) scans were analyzed for a fully fractionated treatment course. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured and the 3D displacement vectors of the centroid positions were compared for all scans. Furthermore, motion amplitude variations in different lung segments were statistically analyzed. The dosimetric impact of target motion variations and target motion assessment was investigated in exemplary patient cases. RESULTS: The median observed centroid motion was 3.4 mm (range: 0.2–12.4 mm) with an average variation of 2.2 mm (range: 0.1–8.8 mm). Ten of 32 patients (31.3%) with an initial motion <5 mm increased beyond a 5‐mm motion amplitude during the treatment course. Motion observed in the 4DCBCT scans deviated on average 1.5 mm (range: 0.0–6.0 mm) from the motion observed in the 4DCTs. Larger motion variations for one example patient compromised treatment plan robustness while no dosimetric influence was seen due to motion assessment biases in another example case. CONCLUSIONS: Target motion variations were investigated during the course of radiotherapy for NSCLC patients. Patients with initial GTV motion amplitudes of < 2 mm can be assumed to be stable in motion during the treatment course. For treatments of NSCLC patients who exhibit motion amplitudes of > 2 mm, 4DCBCT should be considered for motion monitoring due to substantial motion variations observed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-09 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7586844/ /pubmed/32573792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14345 Text en ©2020 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS den Otter, Lydia A. Anakotta, Renske M. Weessies, Menkedina Roos, Catharina T. G. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Muijs, Christina T. Dieters, Margriet Wijsman, Robin Troost, Esther G. C. Richter, Christian Meijers, Arturs Langendijk, Johannes A. Both, Stefan Knopf, Antje‐Christin Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title | Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title_full | Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title_short | Investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
title_sort | investigation of inter‐fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer patients |
topic | THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denotterlydiaa investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT anakottarenskem investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT weessiesmenkedina investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT rooscatharinatg investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT sijtsemanannam investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT muijschristinat investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT dietersmargriet investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT wijsmanrobin investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT troostesthergc investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT richterchristian investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT meijersarturs investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT langendijkjohannesa investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT bothstefan investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients AT knopfantjechristin investigationofinterfractiontargetmotionvariationsinthecontextofpencilbeamscannedprotontherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatients |