Cargando…

Changes in air quality and human mobility in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic

The first goal of this study is to quantify the magnitude and spatial variability of air quality changes in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on two pollutants that are federally regulated, nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)). NO(2) and PM(2.5) are both primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer, Cristina L., Cervone, Guido, Golbazi, Maryam, Al Fahel, Nicolas, Hultquist, Carolynne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586872/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00019-0
Descripción
Sumario:The first goal of this study is to quantify the magnitude and spatial variability of air quality changes in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on two pollutants that are federally regulated, nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)). NO(2) and PM(2.5) are both primary and secondary pollutants, meaning that they can be emitted either directly into the atmosphere or indirectly from chemical reactions of emitted precursors. NO(2) is emitted during fuel combustion by all motor vehicles and airplanes. PM(2.5) is emitted by airplanes and, among motor vehicles, mostly by diesel vehicles, such as commercial heavy-duty diesel trucks. Both PM(2.5) and NO(2) are also emitted by fossil-fuel power plants, although PM(2.5) almost exclusively by coal power plants. Observed concentrations at all available ground monitoring sites (240 and 480 for NO(2) and PM(2.5), respectively) were compared between April 2020, the month during which the majority of US states had introduced some measure of social distancing (e.g., business and school closures, shelter-in-place, quarantine), and April of the prior 5 years, 2015–2019, as the baseline. Large, statistically significant decreases in NO(2) concentrations were found at more than 65% of the monitoring sites, with an average drop of 2 parts per billion (ppb) when compared to the mean of the previous 5 years. The same patterns are confirmed by satellite-derived NO(2) column totals from NASA OMI, which showed an average drop in 2020 by 13% over the entire country when compared to the mean of the previous 5 years. PM(2.5) concentrations from the ground monitoring sites, however, were not significantly lower in 2020 than those in the past 5 years and were more likely to be higher than lower in April 2020 when compared with those in the previous 5 years. After correcting for the decreasing multi-annual concentration trends, the net effect of COVID-19 at the ground stations in April 2020 was a reduction in NO(2) concentrations by − 1.3ppb and a slight increase in PM(2.5) concentrations by + 0.28 μg/m(3). The second goal of this study is to explain the different responses of these two pollutants, i.e., NO(2) was significantly reduced but PM(2.5) was nearly unaffected, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis put forward is that the shelter-in-place measures affected people’s driving patterns most dramatically, thus passenger vehicle NO(2) emissions were reduced. Commercial vehicles (generally diesel) and electricity demand for all purposes remained relatively unchanged, thus PM(2.5) concentrations did not drop significantly. To establish a correlation between the observed NO(2) changes and the extent to which people were actually sheltering in place, thus driving less, we used a mobility index, which was produced and made public by Descartes Labs. This mobility index aggregates cell phone usage at the county level to capture changes in human movement over time. We found a strong correlation between the observed decreases in NO(2) concentrations and decreases in human mobility, with over 4 ppb decreases in the monthly average where mobility was reduced to near 0 and around 1 ppb decrease where mobility was reduced to 20% of normal or less. By contrast, no discernible pattern was detected between mobility and PM(2.5) concentrations changes, suggesting that decreases in personal-vehicle traffic alone may not be effective at reducing PM(2.5) pollution.