Cargando…

Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy

Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benn, Peter, Martin, Kimberly, McKanna, Trudy, Valenti, Elizabeth, Billings, Paul, Demko, Zachary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1208
_version_ 1783600094003593216
author Benn, Peter
Martin, Kimberly
McKanna, Trudy
Valenti, Elizabeth
Billings, Paul
Demko, Zachary
author_facet Benn, Peter
Martin, Kimberly
McKanna, Trudy
Valenti, Elizabeth
Billings, Paul
Demko, Zachary
author_sort Benn, Peter
collection PubMed
description Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NIPT need to be counseled about any such change in their risk for fetal abnormality and also the probability that a redraw will be informative. To help in the decision making, we reviewed a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism‐based NIPT with uninformative results where a redraw was received. Risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy was evaluated using a fetal fraction‐based risk (FFBR) algorithm. Risk‐unchanged women were further analyzed using a regression model to determine the likelihood of an informative redraw. Of 2,644 women with an uninformative NIPT and a redraw, 1,147 (43.4%) were high risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy. 1,497 (56.6%) were risk unchanged and, of these, 975 (65.1%) cases had an informative redraw (i.e., risks were available for 2,122 (80%) of those initially classified as uninformative). The regression model for the risk‐unchanged cases provided a new table for predicting an informative redraw. Likelihood of a successful redraw was significantly (p < .001) dependent on the initial FF, maternal weight, and time between blood draws. We conclude that the FFBR algorithm and the predictive model for an informative redraw provide complementary additions in the management of women presented with an initially uninformative SNP‐based NIPT due to low FF. We suggest approaches for the counseling and follow‐up testing for women with an initially uninformative NIPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7586960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75869602020-10-30 Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy Benn, Peter Martin, Kimberly McKanna, Trudy Valenti, Elizabeth Billings, Paul Demko, Zachary J Genet Couns Original Articles Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NIPT need to be counseled about any such change in their risk for fetal abnormality and also the probability that a redraw will be informative. To help in the decision making, we reviewed a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism‐based NIPT with uninformative results where a redraw was received. Risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy was evaluated using a fetal fraction‐based risk (FFBR) algorithm. Risk‐unchanged women were further analyzed using a regression model to determine the likelihood of an informative redraw. Of 2,644 women with an uninformative NIPT and a redraw, 1,147 (43.4%) were high risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy. 1,497 (56.6%) were risk unchanged and, of these, 975 (65.1%) cases had an informative redraw (i.e., risks were available for 2,122 (80%) of those initially classified as uninformative). The regression model for the risk‐unchanged cases provided a new table for predicting an informative redraw. Likelihood of a successful redraw was significantly (p < .001) dependent on the initial FF, maternal weight, and time between blood draws. We conclude that the FFBR algorithm and the predictive model for an informative redraw provide complementary additions in the management of women presented with an initially uninformative SNP‐based NIPT due to low FF. We suggest approaches for the counseling and follow‐up testing for women with an initially uninformative NIPT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7586960/ /pubmed/31872514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1208 Text en © 2019 Natera. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Benn, Peter
Martin, Kimberly
McKanna, Trudy
Valenti, Elizabeth
Billings, Paul
Demko, Zachary
Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title_full Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title_fullStr Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title_full_unstemmed Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title_short Combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
title_sort combining the use of a fetal fraction‐based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7586960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1208
work_keys_str_mv AT bennpeter combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy
AT martinkimberly combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy
AT mckannatrudy combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy
AT valentielizabeth combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy
AT billingspaul combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy
AT demkozachary combiningtheuseofafetalfractionbasedriskalgorithmandprobabilityofaninformativeredrawinnoninvasiveprenataltestingforfetalaneuploidy