Cargando…
Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Many studies have developed cutoff points of anthropometric indices for predicting these diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to differentiate the screening potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092686 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200112 |
_version_ | 1783600152133500928 |
---|---|
author | Darbandi, Mitra Pasdar, Yahya Moradi, Shima Mohamed, Hamid Jan Jan Hamzeh, Behrooz Salimi, Yahya |
author_facet | Darbandi, Mitra Pasdar, Yahya Moradi, Shima Mohamed, Hamid Jan Jan Hamzeh, Behrooz Salimi, Yahya |
author_sort | Darbandi, Mitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Many studies have developed cutoff points of anthropometric indices for predicting these diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to differentiate the screening potential of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) for adult CVD risk. METHODS: We used relevant key words to search electronic databases to identify studies published up to 2019 that used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for assessing the cut-off points of anthropometric indices. We used a random-effects model to pool study results and assessed between-study heterogeneity by using the I (2) statistic and Cochran’s Q test. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 38 cross-sectional and 2 cohort studies with 105 to 137,256 participants aged 18 or older. The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) value for BMI was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63–0.69) in both men and women. The pooled AUC values for WC were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67–0.70) in men and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64–0.74) in women, and the pooled AUC values for WHR were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66–0.73) in men and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68–0.73) in women. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated a slight difference between AUC values of these anthropometric indices. However, indices of abdominal obesity, especially WHR, can better predict CVD occurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7587303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75873032020-10-28 Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Darbandi, Mitra Pasdar, Yahya Moradi, Shima Mohamed, Hamid Jan Jan Hamzeh, Behrooz Salimi, Yahya Prev Chronic Dis Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Many studies have developed cutoff points of anthropometric indices for predicting these diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to differentiate the screening potential of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) for adult CVD risk. METHODS: We used relevant key words to search electronic databases to identify studies published up to 2019 that used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for assessing the cut-off points of anthropometric indices. We used a random-effects model to pool study results and assessed between-study heterogeneity by using the I (2) statistic and Cochran’s Q test. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 38 cross-sectional and 2 cohort studies with 105 to 137,256 participants aged 18 or older. The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) value for BMI was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63–0.69) in both men and women. The pooled AUC values for WC were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67–0.70) in men and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64–0.74) in women, and the pooled AUC values for WHR were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66–0.73) in men and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68–0.73) in women. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated a slight difference between AUC values of these anthropometric indices. However, indices of abdominal obesity, especially WHR, can better predict CVD occurrence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7587303/ /pubmed/33092686 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200112 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Darbandi, Mitra Pasdar, Yahya Moradi, Shima Mohamed, Hamid Jan Jan Hamzeh, Behrooz Salimi, Yahya Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Discriminatory Capacity of Anthropometric Indices for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | discriminatory capacity of anthropometric indices for cardiovascular disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092686 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darbandimitra discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pasdaryahya discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moradishima discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohamedhamidjanjan discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hamzehbehrooz discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salimiyahya discriminatorycapacityofanthropometricindicesforcardiovasculardiseaseinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |