Cargando…
Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is treated with increasingly sophisticated radiation techniques. The aim of the study is to compare acute toxicity in patients managed with different therapeutic modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients irradiated between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed: A....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133656 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0091 |
_version_ | 1783600180460781568 |
---|---|
author | Poźniak-Balicka, Róża Chomiak, Beata Wośkowiak, Piotr Nowicki, Norbert Bojarski, Jacek Salagierski, Maciej |
author_facet | Poźniak-Balicka, Róża Chomiak, Beata Wośkowiak, Piotr Nowicki, Norbert Bojarski, Jacek Salagierski, Maciej |
author_sort | Poźniak-Balicka, Róża |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is treated with increasingly sophisticated radiation techniques. The aim of the study is to compare acute toxicity in patients managed with different therapeutic modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients irradiated between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed: A. conformal 3D – 11, B. intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) 20, C. image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) – 19 and D. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) – 10. Patients' age ranged from 46 to 85 years (median 70.5), prostate-specific antigen values at the time of diagnosis were in the range of 3.54–154 ng/ml (median 15.9). Acute toxicity from the genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) tracts according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) /Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading system were assessed. RESULTS: All irradiation techniques were well tolerated and neither 3 nor 4 degrees acute toxicity was observed. Importantly, IGRT and IMRT did not lead to Grade 2 GI acute toxicity. There was no relationship between the severity of GU acute toxicity depending on the irradiation technique used (p = 0.8), but a trend towards a significant relationship was noted for GI acute toxicity (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All assessed irradiation methods do not lead to severe acute adverse effects. Importantly, patients treated with IGRT and IMRT had only minor GI toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7587475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75874752020-10-30 Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques Poźniak-Balicka, Róża Chomiak, Beata Wośkowiak, Piotr Nowicki, Norbert Bojarski, Jacek Salagierski, Maciej Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is treated with increasingly sophisticated radiation techniques. The aim of the study is to compare acute toxicity in patients managed with different therapeutic modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients irradiated between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed: A. conformal 3D – 11, B. intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) 20, C. image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) – 19 and D. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) – 10. Patients' age ranged from 46 to 85 years (median 70.5), prostate-specific antigen values at the time of diagnosis were in the range of 3.54–154 ng/ml (median 15.9). Acute toxicity from the genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) tracts according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) /Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading system were assessed. RESULTS: All irradiation techniques were well tolerated and neither 3 nor 4 degrees acute toxicity was observed. Importantly, IGRT and IMRT did not lead to Grade 2 GI acute toxicity. There was no relationship between the severity of GU acute toxicity depending on the irradiation technique used (p = 0.8), but a trend towards a significant relationship was noted for GI acute toxicity (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All assessed irradiation methods do not lead to severe acute adverse effects. Importantly, patients treated with IGRT and IMRT had only minor GI toxicity. Polish Urological Association 2020-08-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7587475/ /pubmed/33133656 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0091 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Poźniak-Balicka, Róża Chomiak, Beata Wośkowiak, Piotr Nowicki, Norbert Bojarski, Jacek Salagierski, Maciej Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title | Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title_full | Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title_fullStr | Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title_short | Does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? A comparison of four radiation techniques |
title_sort | does the radiation approach affect acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients? a comparison of four radiation techniques |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133656 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pozniakbalickaroza doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques AT chomiakbeata doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques AT woskowiakpiotr doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques AT nowickinorbert doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques AT bojarskijacek doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques AT salagierskimaciej doestheradiationapproachaffectacutetoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsacomparisonoffourradiationtechniques |