Cargando…
Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33086580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791 |
_version_ | 1783600190004920320 |
---|---|
author | Ponec, Robert Cooper, David L. Karadakov, Peter B. |
author_facet | Ponec, Robert Cooper, David L. Karadakov, Peter B. |
author_sort | Ponec, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying singlet and triplet states of the paradigmatic molecules of benzene and square cyclobutadiene and the inorganic ring S(2)N(2). The comparison of the excited-state indices with aromaticity trends for individual excited states suggested by the values of magnetic aromaticity criteria show that whereas the indices work well for aromaticity reversals between the ground singlet and first triplet electronic states, addressed by Baird’s rule, there are no straightforward parallels between the two sets of data for singlet excited states. The problems experienced while applying multicentre bond indices and d(AB) to singlet excited states are explained by the loss of the information inherently present in wavefunctions and/or pair densities when calculating the first-order density matrix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7587523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75875232020-10-29 Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? Ponec, Robert Cooper, David L. Karadakov, Peter B. Molecules Article Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying singlet and triplet states of the paradigmatic molecules of benzene and square cyclobutadiene and the inorganic ring S(2)N(2). The comparison of the excited-state indices with aromaticity trends for individual excited states suggested by the values of magnetic aromaticity criteria show that whereas the indices work well for aromaticity reversals between the ground singlet and first triplet electronic states, addressed by Baird’s rule, there are no straightforward parallels between the two sets of data for singlet excited states. The problems experienced while applying multicentre bond indices and d(AB) to singlet excited states are explained by the loss of the information inherently present in wavefunctions and/or pair densities when calculating the first-order density matrix. MDPI 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7587523/ /pubmed/33086580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ponec, Robert Cooper, David L. Karadakov, Peter B. Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title | Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title_full | Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title_fullStr | Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title_short | Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? |
title_sort | are multicentre bond indices and related quantities reliable predictors of excited-state aromaticity? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33086580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ponecrobert aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity AT cooperdavidl aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity AT karadakovpeterb aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity |