Cargando…

Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?

Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ponec, Robert, Cooper, David L., Karadakov, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33086580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791
_version_ 1783600190004920320
author Ponec, Robert
Cooper, David L.
Karadakov, Peter B.
author_facet Ponec, Robert
Cooper, David L.
Karadakov, Peter B.
author_sort Ponec, Robert
collection PubMed
description Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying singlet and triplet states of the paradigmatic molecules of benzene and square cyclobutadiene and the inorganic ring S(2)N(2). The comparison of the excited-state indices with aromaticity trends for individual excited states suggested by the values of magnetic aromaticity criteria show that whereas the indices work well for aromaticity reversals between the ground singlet and first triplet electronic states, addressed by Baird’s rule, there are no straightforward parallels between the two sets of data for singlet excited states. The problems experienced while applying multicentre bond indices and d(AB) to singlet excited states are explained by the loss of the information inherently present in wavefunctions and/or pair densities when calculating the first-order density matrix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7587523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75875232020-10-29 Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity? Ponec, Robert Cooper, David L. Karadakov, Peter B. Molecules Article Systematic scrutiny is carried out of the ability of multicentre bond indices and the NOEL-based similarity index d(AB) to serve as excited-state aromaticity criteria. These indices were calculated using state-optimized complete active-space self-consistent field wavefunctions for several low-lying singlet and triplet states of the paradigmatic molecules of benzene and square cyclobutadiene and the inorganic ring S(2)N(2). The comparison of the excited-state indices with aromaticity trends for individual excited states suggested by the values of magnetic aromaticity criteria show that whereas the indices work well for aromaticity reversals between the ground singlet and first triplet electronic states, addressed by Baird’s rule, there are no straightforward parallels between the two sets of data for singlet excited states. The problems experienced while applying multicentre bond indices and d(AB) to singlet excited states are explained by the loss of the information inherently present in wavefunctions and/or pair densities when calculating the first-order density matrix. MDPI 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7587523/ /pubmed/33086580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ponec, Robert
Cooper, David L.
Karadakov, Peter B.
Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title_full Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title_fullStr Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title_full_unstemmed Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title_short Are Multicentre Bond Indices and Related Quantities Reliable Predictors of Excited-State Aromaticity?
title_sort are multicentre bond indices and related quantities reliable predictors of excited-state aromaticity?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33086580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204791
work_keys_str_mv AT ponecrobert aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity
AT cooperdavidl aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity
AT karadakovpeterb aremulticentrebondindicesandrelatedquantitiesreliablepredictorsofexcitedstatearomaticity