Cargando…

Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturity and performance of layer breeders. A total of 192 fourteen-wk-old White Leghorn (WL) breeder hens were randomly allocated to 4 treatments of 48 birds each, with 2 replicates per treatment. The birds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Lei, Sun, Yanyan, Xu, Hong, Liu, Yifan, Li, Yunlei, Huang, Ziyan, Ni, Aixin, Chen, Chao, Li, Dongli, Wang, Panlin, Fan, Jing, Ma, Hui, Chen, Jilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.027
_version_ 1783600236834324480
author Shi, Lei
Sun, Yanyan
Xu, Hong
Liu, Yifan
Li, Yunlei
Huang, Ziyan
Ni, Aixin
Chen, Chao
Li, Dongli
Wang, Panlin
Fan, Jing
Ma, Hui
Chen, Jilan
author_facet Shi, Lei
Sun, Yanyan
Xu, Hong
Liu, Yifan
Li, Yunlei
Huang, Ziyan
Ni, Aixin
Chen, Chao
Li, Dongli
Wang, Panlin
Fan, Jing
Ma, Hui
Chen, Jilan
author_sort Shi, Lei
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturity and performance of layer breeders. A total of 192 fourteen-wk-old White Leghorn (WL) breeder hens were randomly allocated to 4 treatments of 48 birds each, with 2 replicates per treatment. The birds were photostimulated at 16 (PS16), 18 (PS18), 20 (PS20), and 22 (PS22) wk of age. Four birds per treatment were randomly selected to evaluate sexual organ development at 1 D before photostimulation and 2, 4, and 6 wk after photostimulation. The ovary weight, large yellow follicles number (LYF), oviduct weight, and oviduct length of PS18 increased sharply after photostimulation. Conversely, the increase in PS16 was not observed until 2 wk after photostimulation. There was no difference in age at sexual maturity between treatments (P > 0.05). The PS16 had the longest interval (28 D) from photostimulation to 5% egg production, while PS22 reached 5% egg production 7 D before photostimulation. The PS22 had lower peak production (P = 0.02) and less egg production (P = 0.02) than other treatments. The PS16 had more broken and abnormal eggs (P = 0.01) and lower hatchability (P = 0.04) than other treatments. In conclusion, photostimulation at 16 and 22 wk of age decreases hatchability and egg production, respectively, and photostimulation at 18 wk is appreciated for the WL breeder hens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7587730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75877302020-10-27 Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders Shi, Lei Sun, Yanyan Xu, Hong Liu, Yifan Li, Yunlei Huang, Ziyan Ni, Aixin Chen, Chao Li, Dongli Wang, Panlin Fan, Jing Ma, Hui Chen, Jilan Poult Sci Management and Production The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturity and performance of layer breeders. A total of 192 fourteen-wk-old White Leghorn (WL) breeder hens were randomly allocated to 4 treatments of 48 birds each, with 2 replicates per treatment. The birds were photostimulated at 16 (PS16), 18 (PS18), 20 (PS20), and 22 (PS22) wk of age. Four birds per treatment were randomly selected to evaluate sexual organ development at 1 D before photostimulation and 2, 4, and 6 wk after photostimulation. The ovary weight, large yellow follicles number (LYF), oviduct weight, and oviduct length of PS18 increased sharply after photostimulation. Conversely, the increase in PS16 was not observed until 2 wk after photostimulation. There was no difference in age at sexual maturity between treatments (P > 0.05). The PS16 had the longest interval (28 D) from photostimulation to 5% egg production, while PS22 reached 5% egg production 7 D before photostimulation. The PS22 had lower peak production (P = 0.02) and less egg production (P = 0.02) than other treatments. The PS16 had more broken and abnormal eggs (P = 0.01) and lower hatchability (P = 0.04) than other treatments. In conclusion, photostimulation at 16 and 22 wk of age decreases hatchability and egg production, respectively, and photostimulation at 18 wk is appreciated for the WL breeder hens. Elsevier 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7587730/ /pubmed/32029163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.027 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Management and Production
Shi, Lei
Sun, Yanyan
Xu, Hong
Liu, Yifan
Li, Yunlei
Huang, Ziyan
Ni, Aixin
Chen, Chao
Li, Dongli
Wang, Panlin
Fan, Jing
Ma, Hui
Chen, Jilan
Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title_full Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title_fullStr Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title_full_unstemmed Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title_short Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
title_sort effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders
topic Management and Production
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.027
work_keys_str_mv AT shilei effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT sunyanyan effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT xuhong effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT liuyifan effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT liyunlei effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT huangziyan effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT niaixin effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT chenchao effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT lidongli effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT wangpanlin effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT fanjing effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT mahui effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders
AT chenjilan effectofageatphotostimulationonsexualmaturationandegglayingperformanceoflayerbreeders